A Hierarchical Three-Dimensional Porous Laser-Scribed Graphene Film for Suppressing Polysulfide Shuttling in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
The lithium–sulfur (Li-S) battery is a promising next-generation rechargeable battery with high energy density. Given the outstanding capacities of sulfur (1675 mAh g–1) and lithium metal (3861 mAh g–1), Li-S battery theoretically delivers an ultrahigh energy density of 2567 Wh kg–1. However, this energy density cannot be realized due to several factors, particularly the shuttling of polysulfide intermediates between the cathode and anode, which causes serious degradation of capacity and cycling stability of a Li-S battery. In this work, a simple and scalable route was employed to construct a freestanding laser-scribed graphene (LSG) interlayer that effectively suppresses the polysulfide shuttling in Li-S batteries. Thus, a high specific capacity (1160 mAh g–1) with excellent cycling stability (80.4% capacity retention after 100 cycles) has been achieved due to the unique structure of hierarchical three-dimensional pores in the freestanding LSG.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Materials Science and Engineering, Physical Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
Funding
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.04410.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.044 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.04810.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.048 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20160682310.1002/adma.201606823 ↗
4. 10.1038/nchem.208510.1038/nchem.2085 ↗
5. 10.1038/nmat319110.1038/nmat3191 ↗
6. 10.1002/aenm.20170026010.1002/aenm.201700260 ↗
7. 10.1039/b925751a10.1039/b925751a ↗
8. 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.04.00710.1016/j.mattod.2018.04.007 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.enchem.2019.10000210.1016/j.enchem.2019.100002 ↗
10. 10.1149/1.180639410.1149/1.1806394 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.09.04810.1016/j.carbon.2018.09.048 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.05.00610.1016/j.ensm.2018.05.006 ↗
13. 10.1039/C7TA10272K10.1039/C7TA10272K ↗
14. 10.1038/ncomms216310.1038/ncomms2163 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.01.00310.1016/j.joule.2019.01.003 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0069210.1021/acsenergylett.7b00692 ↗
17. 10.1002/cssc.20130128710.1002/cssc.201301287 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.10810.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.108 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.16210.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.162 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.7b1889410.1021/acsami.7b18894 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.7b1419510.1021/acsami.7b14195 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.06310.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.063 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.09.00110.1016/j.nanoen.2015.09.001 ↗
24. 10.1039/C6TA07027B10.1039/C6TA07027B ↗
25. 10.1039/C5TA04255K10.1039/C5TA04255K ↗
26. 10.1021/acsami.8b0731610.1021/acsami.8b07316 ↗
27. 10.4236/graphene.2017.6100110.4236/graphene.2017.61001 ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20180362110.1002/adma.201803621 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.bios.2018.02.03110.1016/j.bios.2018.02.031 ↗
30. 10.1002/aenm.20180184010.1002/aenm.201801840 ↗
31. 10.1002/aenm.20180035310.1002/aenm.201800353 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.nantod.2018.12.00310.1016/j.nantod.2018.12.003 ↗
33. 10.1038/ncomms671410.1038/ncomms6714 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.01.05610.1016/j.electacta.2009.01.056 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.18740110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.187401 ↗
36. 10.1002/adfm.20150225110.1002/adfm.201502251 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.04110.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.041 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.14210.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.142 ↗
39. 10.1002/cssc.20180244910.1002/cssc.201802449 ↗
40. 10.1002/adfm.20160666310.1002/adfm.201606663 ↗
41. 10.1149/2.0181501jes10.1149/2.0181501jes ↗
42. 10.1039/c1ee01598b10.1039/c1ee01598b ↗
43. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.12.08110.1016/j.carbon.2015.12.081 ↗