journal article·2014-08-13

Quantitative Understanding of pH- and Salt-Mediated Conformational Folding of Histidine-Containing, β-Hairpin-like Peptides, through Single-Molecule Probing with Protein Nanopores

Loredana Mereuta, Alina Asandei, Chang Ho Seo, Yoonkyung Park, Tudor Luchian

Publisher page

Abstract

Inter-amino acid residues electrostatic interactions contribute to the conformational stability of peptides and proteins, influence their folding pathways, and are critically important to a multitude of problems in biology including the onset of misfolding diseases. By varying the pH and ionic strength, the inter-amino acid residues electrostatic interactions of histidine-containing, β-hairpin-like peptides alter their folding behavior, and we studied this through quantifying, at the unimolecular level, the frequency, dwell-times of translocation events, and amplitude of blockades associated with interactions between such peptides and the α-hemolysin (α-HL) protein. Acidic buffers were shown to dramatically decrease the rate of peptide capture by the α-HL protein, through the interplay of enthalpic and entropic contributions brought about on the free energy barrier, which controls the peptides-α-HL association rate. We found that in acidic buffers, the amplitude of the blockage induced by an α-HL, β-barrel-residing peptide is smaller than the value seen at neutral pH, and this supports our interpretation of the pH-induced change in the conformation of the peptide, which behaves as a less-stable hairpin at acidic pH values that obstructs, to a lesser extent, the protein pore. This is also confirmed by the fact that the dissociation rate of such model peptide from the α-HL's β-barrel is higher at acidic, as compared to neutral, pH values. Experiments performed in low-salt buffers revealed the dramatic decrease of the peptide capture rate by the α-HL protein, most likely caused by the increase in the radius of counterions cloud around the peptide that hinders peptide partition into the α-barrel, and histidines protonation at low pH bolsters this effect. Reduced electrostatic screening in low-salt buffers, at neutral pH, leads to a decrease in peptides effective cross-sectional areas and an increase of their mobility inside the α-HL pore, due most likely to the chain stretching augmentation, via increased inter-residues electrostatic interactions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Ion-surface interactions and analysis · Thermal properties of materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, Alexandru I. Cuza University, Iasi 700506, Romania

Department of Interdisciplinary Research, Alexandru I. Cuza University, Iasi 700506, Romania

Department of Bioinformatics, Kongju National University, Kongju 182, South Korea

Research Center for Proteineous Materials, Chosun University, Gwangju 375, South Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea · Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. Butterfield S. M. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2010 · 49 · 210.1002/anie.200906670 ↗
2. Matthew J. B. · CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem. · 1985 · 18 · 9110.3109/10409238509085133 ↗
3. Xiong K. · Biochemistry · 2009 · 48 · 1081810.1021/bi9014709 ↗
4. Marqusee S. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 1987 · 84 · 889810.1073/pnas.84.24.8898 ↗
5. Kao Y.-H. · Biophys. J. · 2000 · 79 · 163710.1016/S0006-3495(00)76414-9 ↗
6. Khandogin J. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2006 · 103 · 1854610.1073/pnas.0605216103 ↗
7. Feng J. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2009 · 113 · 947210.1021/jp902537f ↗
8. Ozbas B. · Macromolecules · 2004 · 37 · 733110.1021/ma0491762 ↗
9. Majd S. · Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. · 2010 · 21 · 43910.1016/j.copbio.2010.05.002 ↗
10. Gu L.-Q. · Analyst · 2010 · 135 · 44110.1039/B907735A ↗
11. Kasianowicz J. J. · Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. · 2008 · 1 · 73710.1146/annurev.anchem.1.031207.112818 ↗
12. Bayley, H.; Luchian, T.; Shin, S.H.; Steffensen, M. B.InSingle Molecules and Nanotechnology;Rigler, R.; Vogel, H., Eds.Springer-Verlag:Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008; Chapter 10, pp251–277.10.1007/978-3-540-73924-1_10 ↗
13. Wang G. · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2013 · 46 · 286710.1021/ar400031x ↗
14. Movileanu L. · Trends Biotechnol. · 2009 · 27 · 33310.1016/j.tibtech.2009.02.008 ↗
15. Dekker C. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2007 · 2 · 20910.1038/nnano.2007.27 ↗
16. Oukhaled A. · ACS Chem. Biol. · 2012 · 7 · 193510.1021/cb300449t ↗
17. Bezrukov S. M. · Nature · 1994 · 370 · 27910.1038/370279a0 ↗
18. Kasianowicz J. J. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 1996 · 93 · 1377010.1073/pnas.93.24.13770 ↗
19. Luchian T. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2003 · 42 · 376610.1002/anie.200351313 ↗
20. Luchian T. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2003 · 42 · 192610.1002/anie.200250666 ↗
21. Shin S.–H. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2002 · 41 · 370710.1002/1521-3773(20021004)41:19<3707::AID-ANIE3707>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗
22. Gu L.-Q. · Nature · 1999 · 398 · 68610.1038/19491 ↗
23. Asandei A. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2011 · 115 · 1017310.1021/jp204640t ↗
24. Asandei A. · J. Mol. Recognit. · 2011 · 24 · 19910.1002/jmr.1038 ↗
25. Reiner J. E. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2010 · 107 · 1208010.1073/pnas.1002194107 ↗
26. Robertson J. W. F. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2007 · 104 · 820710.1073/pnas.0611085104 ↗
27. Cressiot B. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 623610.1021/nn301672g ↗
28. Merstorf C. · ACS Chem. Biol. · 2012 · 7 · 65210.1021/cb2004737 ↗
29. Oukhaled G. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 98 · 15810110.1103/PhysRevLett.98.158101 ↗
30. Talaga D. S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 928710.1021/ja901088b ↗
31. Freedman K. J. · Anal. Chem. · 2011 · 83 · 513710.1021/ac2001725 ↗
32. Pastoriza-Gallego M. · Biochim. Biophys. Acta · 2009 · 1788 · 137710.1016/j.bbamem.2009.03.011 ↗
33. Payet L. · Anal. Chem. · 2012 · 84 · 407110.1021/ac300129e ↗
34. Oukhaled A. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 362810.1021/nn1034795 ↗
35. Freedman K. J. · Sci. Rep. · 2013 · 3 · 163810.1038/srep01638 ↗
36. Song L. · Science · 1996 · 274 · 185910.1126/science.274.5294.1859 ↗
37. Bezrukov S. M. · Eur. Biophys. J. · 1997 · 26 · 47110.1007/s002490050101 ↗
38. Kang X.-F. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2005 · 44 · 149510.1002/anie.200461885 ↗
39. Oukhaled G. · Europhys. Lett. · 2008 · 82 · 4800310.1209/0295-5075/82/48003 ↗
40. Rodriguez-Larrea D. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2013 · 8 · 28810.1038/nnano.2013.22 ↗
41. Jeon B. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2014 · 140 · 01510110.1063/1.4855075 ↗
42. Movileanu L. · Biophys. J. · 2005 · 89 · 103010.1529/biophysj.104.057406 ↗
43. Asandei A. · Langmuir · 2011 · 27 · 1910.1021/la104264f ↗
44. Stefureac R. · Biochemistry · 2006 · 45 · 917210.1021/bi0604835 ↗
45. Wolfe A. J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2007 · 129 · 1403410.1021/ja0749340 ↗
46. Goodrich C. P. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2007 · 111 · 333210.1021/jp071364h ↗
47. Mohammad M. M. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2008 · 130 · 408110.1021/ja710787a ↗
48. Mereuta L. · Langmuir · 2012 · 28 · 1707910.1021/la303782d ↗
49. Wang G. · Biosens. Bioelectron. · 2014 · 53 · 45310.1016/j.bios.2013.10.013 ↗
50. Asandei A. · Langmuir · 2013 · 29 · 1563410.1021/la403915t ↗
51. Asandei A. · J. Membr. Biol. · 2014 · 247 · 52310.1007/s00232-014-9662-z ↗
52. Baran C. · Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. · 2010 · 391 · 22410.1016/j.bbrc.2009.11.036 ↗
53. Stefureac R. · Small · 2008 · 4 · 5910.1002/smll.200700402 ↗
54. Wang H.-Y. · Anal. Chem. · 2011 · 83 · 174610.1021/ac1029874 ↗
55. Mereuta L. · Sci. Rep. · 2014 · 4 · 388510.1038/srep03885 ↗
56. Sandberg A. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2010 · 107 · 1559510.1073/pnas.1001740107 ↗
57. Abelein A. · J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. · 2014 · 19 · 62310.1007/s00775-014-1131-8 ↗
58. Liao S.-M. · Chem. Cent. J. · 2013 · 7 · 4410.1186/1752-153X-7-44 ↗
59. Lee D. G. · J. Pept. Sci. · 2004 · 10 · 29810.1002/psc.504 ↗
60. Further information can be found at the following GenScriptWeb site:https://www.genscript.com/ssl-bin/site2/peptide_calculation.cgi(accessed April 5, 2014) .
61. DeBlois R. W. · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1970 · 41 · 90910.1063/1.1684724 ↗
62. Yusko E. C. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 6 · 25310.1038/nnano.2011.12 ↗
63. Wong C. T. A. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 133 · 04510110.1063/1.3464333 ↗
64. Wanunu M. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2010 · 5 · 16010.1038/nnano.2009.379 ↗
65. Stein D. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 03590110.1103/PhysRevLett.93.035901 ↗
66. Chang H. · Nano Lett. · 2004 · 4 · 155110.1021/nl049267c ↗
67. Garcia-Mira M. M. · Science · 2002 · 298 · 219110.1126/science.1077809 ↗
68. Arbely E. · J. Mol. Biol. · 2009 · 387 · 98610.1016/j.jmb.2008.12.055 ↗
69. Bostrom M. · Biophys. J. · 2003 · 85 · 68610.1016/S0006-3495(03)74512-3 ↗
70. Rosenstein J. K. · Nat. Methods · 2012 · 9 · 48710.1038/nmeth.1932 ↗