Dynamic Optical Gratings Accessed by Reversible Shape Memory
Source abstract
Abstract
Shape memory polymers (SMPs) have been shown to accurately replicate photonic structures that produce tunable optical responses, but in practice, these responses are limited by the irreversibility of conventional shape memory processes. Here, we report the intensity modulation of a diffraction grating utilizing two-way reversible shape changes. Reversible shifting of the grating height was accomplished through partial melting and recrystallization of semicrystalline poly(octylene adipate). The concurrent variations of the grating shape and diffraction intensity were monitored via atomic force microscopy and first order diffraction measurements, respectively. A maximum reversibility of the diffraction intensity of 36% was repeatable over multiple cycles. To that end, the reversible shape memory process is shown to broaden the functionality of SMP-based optical devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer composites and self-healing · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Photonic Crystals and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Applied Physical Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
Funding
Division of Materials Research
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Sinzinger S. · 2003 · 305
2. Werber A. · Appl. Opt. · 2005 · 44 · 323810.1364/AO.44.003238 ↗
3. Truxal K. · Solid-State Sensor Actuat Microsystems Conf. · 2007 · 1087
4. Ouyang G. · Sens. Actuators, A · 2010 · 158 · 31310.1016/j.sna.2010.02.006 ↗
5. Aschwanden M. · IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. · 2007 · 19 · 109010.1109/LPT.2007.900055 ↗
6. Xie T. · Polymer · 2011 · 52 · 498510.1016/j.polymer.2011.08.003 ↗
7. Havens E. · Proc. SPIE · 2005 · 5762 · 4810.1117/12.606109 ↗
8. Xie T. · Nature · 2010 · 464 · 26710.1038/nature08863 ↗
9. Behl M. · Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 338810.1002/adma.200904447 ↗
10. Liu Y. · Compos. Sci. Technol. · 2009 · 69 · 206410.1016/j.compscitech.2008.08.016 ↗
11. Chung T. · Macromolecules · 2008 · 41 · 18410.1021/ma071517z ↗
12. Pandini S. · Polymer · 2012 · 53 · 191510.1016/j.polymer.2012.02.053 ↗
13. Westbrook K. K. · Smar Mater. Struct · 2011 · 20 · 065010/1
14. Zhou J. · Macromolecules · 2014 · 47 · 176810.1021/ma4023185 ↗
15. Behl M. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2013 · 110 · 1255510.1073/pnas.1301895110 ↗
16. Meng Y. · ACS Macro Lett. · 2015 · 4 · 11510.1021/mz500773v ↗
17. Xu H. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2013 · 23 · 329910.1002/adfm.201203396 ↗
18. Turner S. A. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 6 · 801710.1021/am501970d ↗
19. Espinha A. · Adv. Opt. Mater. · 2014 · 2 · 51610.1002/adom.201300532 ↗
20. Deka B. · Appl. Opt. · 2011 · 50 · E19310.1364/AO.50.00E193 ↗
21. Chang C.-H. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B · 2003 · 21 · 275510.1116/1.1627814 ↗
22. Wang J. · Chin. Opt. Lett. · 2005 · 3 · 497
23. Chang C. L. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 233901/1