journal article·2020-02-12Open access

Current-voltage characteristics of Cu2ZnSnS4 absorber layer for energy harvesting devices

V Baskaran, S Sakthivel

Materials Research Express· Volume 6· Issue 12

Abstract

Environment friendly Copper-Zinc-Tin-Sulphide (CZTS)/Cadmium sulphide (CdS) thin film solar cells have been fabricated by sequential vacuum thermal evaporation technique. The developed CZTS films having the thickness of 1μm from layer by layer deposition of Cu: ZnS: Sn precursors having various compositional ratios (2:1:1, 2:1.5:1 and 2:2:1). Structural and morphological information of CZTS films were analyzed by XRD, Raman and SEM. The structural analysis showed increase with thickness and grain size increases whereas strain and dislocation density decreases. UV–vis absorption studies revealed that CZTS thin films have an optical band gap around 1.5 eV and it shows a large absorption coefficient (>104 cm−1). Four probe and Hall measurements indicate that CZTS thin film has the resistivity from 1.5–2.96 Ω-cm and the hole concentration from the value 9.1 × 1016–2.09 × 1018 N (cm−3). The deposited film CZTS were annealed at 500°C, to avoid forming binary compounds. Thin film solar cell has the structure of ITO/Mo/CZTS/CdS/i-ZnO/Al-grid/ITO exhibits the photovoltaic conversion efficiency of 5.6% under Air Mass (AM) 1.5 conditions and its photovoltaic performances were examined. This approach is favoured due to cell efficiency has a very large influence on the acceptable manufacturing cost of a PV module.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1155/2015/75084610.1155/2015/750846 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.solener.2019.06.00410.1016/j.solener.2019.06.004 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.10991510.1016/j.solmat.2019.109915 ↗
4. Olgar M T · Mater. Res. Express · 2019 · 610.1088/2053-1591/aaff78 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.12610.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.126 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.physb.2017.09.00910.1016/j.physb.2017.09.009 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.mssp.2016.08.01210.1016/j.mssp.2016.08.012 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.optmat.2017.10.01510.1016/j.optmat.2017.10.015 ↗
9. 10.1002/aenm.20120034810.1002/aenm.201200348 ↗
10. 10.1002/aenm.20130146510.1002/aenm.201301465 ↗
11. 10.1007/978-3-642-22919-010.1007/978-3-642-22919-0 ↗
12. 10.1021/ja108427b10.1021/ja108427b ↗
13. 10.1002/pip.117410.1002/pip.1174 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.349928410.1063/1.3499284 ↗
15. Suryawanshi M P · Energy Mater: Mater Sci Eng Energy Syst · 2013 · 8 · 98
16. 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.08.02710.1016/j.solmat.2013.08.027 ↗
17. 10.1021/cm403423e10.1021/cm403423e ↗
18. 10.1007/s11814-017-0011-710.1007/s11814-017-0011-7 ↗
19. 10.1002/adma.20120314610.1002/adma.201203146 ↗
20. 10.1002/aenm.20120034810.1002/aenm.201200348 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.physb.2017.08.03510.1016/j.physb.2017.08.035 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.03.09810.1016/j.matlet.2018.03.098 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.05.02010.1016/j.matpr.2017.05.020 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.06.30510.1016/j.jallcom.2018.06.305 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.02.05810.1016/j.ijleo.2019.02.058 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.00910.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.009 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.06.00110.1016/j.actamat.2015.06.001 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.tsf.2016.09.05310.1016/j.tsf.2016.09.053 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.21010.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.210 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.tsf.2014.05.05310.1016/j.tsf.2014.05.053 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.spmi.2018.03.06510.1016/j.spmi.2018.03.065 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2017.09.00510.1016/j.jpcs.2017.09.005 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.physb.2016.08.01410.1016/j.physb.2016.08.014 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.tsf.2012.12.09510.1016/j.tsf.2012.12.095 ↗