Unidirectional Freezing of Ceramic Suspensions: In Situ X-ray Investigation of the Effects of Additives
Source abstract
Abstract
Using in situ X-ray radiography, we investigated unidirectional freezing of titanium dioxide suspensions. We showed how processing additives, which are generally used for ice-templating, strongly modified freezing dynamics during the solidification process. We observed and identified different freezing regimes by varying the amount of dispersant, binder, or poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG). We demonstrated that because each regime corresponds to a given final structure understanding the particle motion and redistribution at the ice-front level was essential. We also examined the transition from a random particles-entrapment regime to a well-defined lamellar regime and proposed and discussed two mechanisms by which additives might affect the solidification process.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Freezing and Crystallization Processes · Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Materials Sciences Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
Laboratoire de Physique des Surfaces et Interfaces, Université de Mons, Mons 7000, Belgium
Department of Materials Science & Engineering University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Deville S. · Science · 2006 · 311 · 51510.1126/science.1120937 ↗
2. Fukasawa T. · J. Mater. Sci. · 2001 · 36 · 252310.1023/A:1017946518955 ↗
3. Wegst U. G. · Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A · 2010 · 368 · 209910.1098/rsta.2010.0014 ↗
4. Deville S. · Materials · 2010 · 3 · 191310.3390/ma3031913 ↗
5. Deville S. · Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2008 · 10 · 15510.1002/adem.200700270 ↗
6. Gutiérrez M. C. · Chem. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 63410.1021/cm702028z ↗
7. Deville S. · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2009 · 92 · 248910.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03163.x ↗
8. Deville S. · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2009 · 92 · 249710.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03264.x ↗
9. Deville S. · Nat. Mater. · 2009 · 8 · 96610.1038/nmat2571 ↗
10. Deville S. · Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 207710.1016/j.actamat.2012.12.027 ↗
11. Lasalle A. · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2012 · 95 · 79910.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04993.x ↗
12. Lasalle A. · Acta Mater. · 2012 · 60 · 459410.1016/j.actamat.2012.02.023 ↗
13. Munch E. · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2009 · 92 · 153410.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03087.x ↗
14. Deville S. · PloS One · 2011 · e26474-1
15. Deville S. · Langmuir · 2012 · 28 · 1489210.1021/la302275d ↗
16. Waschkies T. · Acta Mater. · 2011 · 59 · 513510.1016/j.actamat.2011.04.046 ↗
17. Lorain O. · Water Res. · 2001 · 35 · 54110.1016/S0043-1354(00)00287-6 ↗
18. Shapiro J. · Science · 1961 · 133 · 206310.1126/science.133.3470.2063 ↗
19. Shanti N. O. · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2006 · 89 · 244410.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01094.x ↗
20. Fu Q. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part B · 2008 · 86 · 12510.1002/jbm.b.30997 ↗
21. Sofie S. W. · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2001 · 84 · 145910.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00860.x ↗
22. Waschkies T. · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2009 · 92 · S7910.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02673.x ↗
23. Deville S. · Biomaterials · 2006 · 27 · 548010.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.06.028 ↗
24. Deville S. · Acta Mater. · 2007 · 55 · 196510.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.003 ↗
25. Anderson A. M. · Langmuir · 2012 · 28 · 1651210.1021/la303458m ↗
26. Peppin S. S. L. · J. Fluid Mech. · 2006 · 554 · 14710.1017/S0022112006009268 ↗
27. Style R. W. · Phys. Rev. E: Stat., Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. · 2011 · 84 · 041402-110.1103/PhysRevE.84.041402 ↗
28. Jenkins P. · Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. · 1996 · 68 · 5710.1016/S0001-8686(96)00304-1 ↗