journal article·2018-07-05

Establishment of a Human iPSC- and Nanofiber-Based Microphysiological Blood–Brain Barrier System

Dianjun Qi, Shaohua Wu, Haishuang Lin, Mitchell A. Kuss, Yuguo Lei, Alexey Krasnoslobodtsev, Shaheen Ahmed, Chi Zhang, Hyung Joon Kim, Peng Jiang, Bin Duan

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 10· Issue 26
Publisher page

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is an active and complex diffusion barrier that separates the circulating blood from the brain and extracellular fluid, regulates nutrient transportation, and provides protection against various toxic compounds and pathogens. Creating an in vitro microphysiological BBB system, particularly with relevant human cell types, will significantly facilitate the research of neuropharmaceutical drug delivery, screening, and transport, as well as improve our understanding of pathologies that are due to BBB damage. Currently, most of the in vitro BBB models are generated by culturing rodent astrocytes and endothelial cells, using commercially available transwell membranes. Those membranes are made of plastic biopolymers that are nonbiodegradable, porous, and stiff. In addition, distinct from rodent astrocytes, human astrocytes possess unique cell complexity and physiology, which are among the few characteristics that differentiate human brains from rodent brains. In this study, we established a novel human BBB microphysiologocal system, consisting of a three-dimensionally printed holder with a electrospun poly(lactic- co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) nanofibrous mesh, a bilayer coculture of human astrocytes, and endothelial cells, derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs), on the electrospun PLGA mesh. This human BBB model achieved significant barrier integrity with tight junction protein expression, an effective permeability to sodium fluorescein, and higher transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER) comparing to electrospun mesh-based counterparts. Moreover, the coculture of hiPSC-derived astrocytes and endothielial cells promoted the tight junction protein expression and the TEER value. We further verified the barrier functions of our BBB model with antibrain tumor drugs (paclitaxel and bortezomib) and a neurotoxic peptide (amyloid β 1-42). The human microphysiological system generated in this study will potentially provide a new, powerful tool for research on human BBB physiology and pathology.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Barrier Structure and Function Studies · Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus · Alzheimer's disease research and treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of General Practice, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, China

College of Textiles & Clothing, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588, United States

Department of Physics, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, Nebraska 68182, United States

Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, United States

Funding

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services · National Institute of Child Health and Human Development · University of Nebraska Medical Center · State of Nebraska

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nrn182410.1038/nrn1824 ↗
2. 10.1038/nature0952210.1038/nature09522 ↗
3. 10.1038/nature0951310.1038/nature09513 ↗
4. 10.2174/15701590878577721010.2174/157015908785777210 ↗
5. 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-285410.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-2854 ↗
6. 10.3389/fncel.2014.0021110.3389/fncel.2014.00211 ↗
7. 10.3109/09687688.2014.93746810.3109/09687688.2014.937468 ↗
8. 10.1212/wnl.0b013e318250d8bc10.1212/wnl.0b013e318250d8bc ↗
9. Chester, A. H.; Taylor, P. M. Molecular Structure and Function of the Tight Junction.Proceedings of an International Conference Dedicated to the Memory of Shoichiro Tsukita: Germany, Berlin, April 25–27, 2008. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2009, 1165, pp 1–346.10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04049.x ↗
10. 10.1002/jps.2432910.1002/jps.24329 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.stem.2017.04.00210.1016/j.stem.2017.04.002 ↗
12. 10.1021/mp500046f10.1021/mp500046f ↗
13. Wilhelm I. · Acta Neurobiol. Exp. · 2011 · 71 · 11310.55782/ane-2011-1828 ↗
14. 10.1083/jcb.115.6.172510.1083/jcb.115.6.1725 ↗
15. 10.1016/s0014-5793(99)00451-210.1016/s0014-5793(99)00451-2 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.01.02310.1016/j.stemcr.2017.01.023 ↗
17. 10.1038/nrd236810.1038/nrd2368 ↗
18. 10.1096/fj.04-3458fje10.1096/fj.04-3458fje ↗
19. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.01.00110.1016/j.tibtech.2016.01.001 ↗
20. 10.1038/nbt.224710.1038/nbt.2247 ↗
21. 10.1002/bit.2604510.1002/bit.26045 ↗
22. 10.1523/jneurosci.4707-08.200910.1523/jneurosci.4707-08.2009 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.stem.2012.12.01510.1016/j.stem.2012.12.015 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.10.01610.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.10.016 ↗
25. 10.1155/2015/47606910.1155/2015/476069 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.05.01610.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.05.016 ↗
27. 10.1083/jcb.20131111210.1083/jcb.201311112 ↗
28. 10.1088/1758-5082/6/3/03501410.1088/1758-5082/6/3/035014 ↗
29. 10.1038/nm.340710.1038/nm.3407 ↗
30. 10.1155/2017/574097510.1155/2017/5740975 ↗
31. Pensabene, V.; Crowder, S. W.; Balikov, D. A.; Lee, J. B.; Sung, H. J. Optimization of Electrospun Fibrous Membranes for In Vitro Modeling of Blood-Brain Barrier.Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; EMBS, 2016; pp 125–128.10.1109/EMBC.2016.7590656 ↗
32. 10.1002/jbm.a.3562410.1002/jbm.a.35624 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.04310.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.043 ↗
34. 10.1038/ncomms543010.1038/ncomms5430 ↗
35. 10.1039/c7tb00721c10.1039/c7tb00721c ↗
36. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.01110.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.011 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.00510.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.005 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.09.01910.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.09.019 ↗
39. 10.3892/etm.2017.425410.3892/etm.2017.4254 ↗
40. 10.1088/1758-5090/aa8fb810.1088/1758-5090/aa8fb8 ↗
41. 10.1126/science.107106510.1126/science.1071065 ↗
42. 10.1186/2045-8118-9-2310.1186/2045-8118-9-23 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.04.00610.1016/j.brainres.2013.04.006 ↗
44. 10.1186/1748-717x-8-20410.1186/1748-717x-8-204 ↗
45. Glantz M. J. · Semin. Radiat. Oncol. · 1999 · 9 · 27
46. 10.1385/jmn:20:3:33910.1385/jmn:20:3:339 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.nbd.2016.01.00810.1016/j.nbd.2016.01.008 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.11.00510.1016/j.yexcr.2009.11.005 ↗
49. 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.19710.1038/jcbfm.2011.197 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.11.00510.1016/j.yexcr.2017.11.005 ↗
51. 10.3390/ijms1809196510.3390/ijms18091965 ↗
52. 10.1101/cshperspect.a00618910.1101/cshperspect.a006189 ↗
53. 10.2174/18715270978760186710.2174/187152709787601867 ↗
54. 10.18632/aging.10036210.18632/aging.100362 ↗
55. 10.1002/jbm.a.3562410.1002/jbm.a.35624 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.02.02110.1016/j.stemcr.2017.02.021 ↗
57. 10.1371/journal.pone.012889010.1371/journal.pone.0128890 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.mex.2015.11.00910.1016/j.mex.2015.11.009 ↗
59. 10.1177/0271678x1663099110.1177/0271678x16630991 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.05.01210.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.05.012 ↗
61. 10.1155/2015/32094110.1155/2015/320941 ↗
62. Weidle U. H. · Cancer Genomics Proteomics · 2015 · 12 · 167
63. 10.1172/jci1545110.1172/jci15451 ↗
64. 10.3171/2016.11.jns16121210.3171/2016.11.jns161212 ↗
65. 10.1039/c7nr05216b10.1039/c7nr05216b ↗
66. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.11.00510.1016/j.yexcr.2017.11.005 ↗
67. 10.1126/science.119762310.1126/science.1197623 ↗
68. 10.3233/jad-2012-12903710.3233/jad-2012-129037 ↗
69. 10.1161/atvbaha.113.30259810.1161/atvbaha.113.302598 ↗