Connection-Improved Conductive Network of Carbon Nanotubes in a Rubber Cross-Link Network
Source abstract
Abstract
Conductive rubber composites usually suffer a large filler content and relatively low conductivity because the uniform dispersion of conductive nanofillers in rubbers is probably inhibited by the cross-link networks. However, by establishing a double-network model of cross-link and conductive networks, we found the connection of one-dimensional nanofillers could be improved by cross-link networks, which stabilized the conductive network. The percolation value of nanofillers could reduce to 0.06 wt % in experiments, using carbon nanotubes (CNTs) with 9.5 nm diameter and 1.5 μm length as nanofillers and poly(dimethylsiloxane) as the matrix. Moreover, the conductive network owned a critical exponent of 5.63, which was higher than that of conventional conductive networks (ca. 2). This feature proved that the connection between CNTs was improved by the poly(dimethylsiloxane) cross-link network. This work subverted the fundamental conception that cross-link networks in rubbers should make fillers aggregate, and we believed it would conduce to the development of sensors and flexible devices of rubber composites.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Conducting polymers and applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Dielectric materials and actuators
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Southwest University, No. 2, Tiansheng Road, Beibei District, Chongqing 400715, China
Funding
Chongqing Science and Technology Commission · Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China · Southwest University · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Key Laboratory of Polymeric Composite and Functional Materials, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/ncomms283210.1038/ncomms2832 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20160352710.1002/adma.201603527 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20160316710.1002/adma.201603167 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.sna.2012.02.05110.1016/j.sna.2012.02.051 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.aag287910.1126/science.aag2879 ↗
6. 10.1002/app.3415810.1002/app.34158 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.2031610.1002/pc.20316 ↗
8. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1987.tb05710.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1987.tb05710.x ↗
9. 10.1126/science.118238310.1126/science.1182383 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20150083910.1002/adma.201500839 ↗
11. 10.1126/science.125016910.1126/science.1250169 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.10.07010.1016/j.carbon.2013.10.070 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.05.10010.1016/j.carbon.2017.05.100 ↗
14. 10.1002/mame.20100035810.1002/mame.201000358 ↗
15. 10.1039/c2jm31293j10.1039/c2jm31293j ↗
16. 10.1021/cr60110a00210.1021/cr60110a002 ↗
17. 10.1002/adfm.20060051910.1002/adfm.200600519 ↗
18. 10.5254/1.353820910.5254/1.3538209 ↗
19. 10.1021/nn500441k10.1021/nn500441k ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20130334910.1002/adma.201303349 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.08.04810.1016/j.carbon.2012.08.048 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0707410.1021/acsnano.5b07074 ↗
23. 10.1002/adfm.20150475510.1002/adfm.201504755 ↗
24. 10.1002/adma.20160352710.1002/adma.201603527 ↗
25. 10.1021/am900050310.1021/am9000503 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.04.01210.1016/j.compscitech.2012.04.012 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.491707010.1063/1.4917070 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.12.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2016.12.014 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.30.393310.1103/PhysRevB.30.3933 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.35.937610.1103/PhysRevB.35.9376 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.13240910.1103/PhysRevB.70.132409 ↗
32. Brandrup J. · 1989
33. 10.1103/RevModPhys.45.57410.1103/RevModPhys.45.574 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.physrep.2004.10.00610.1016/j.physrep.2004.10.006 ↗
35. 10.1098/rsta.2004.145210.1098/rsta.2004.1452 ↗