journal article·2014-04-09Open access

Engineering of the Chemical Reactivity of the Ti/HfO2 Interface for RRAM: Experiment and Theory.

Pauline Calka, Malgorzata Sowinska, Thomas Bertaud, Damian Walczyk, Jarek Dabrowski, Peter Zaumseil, Christian Walczyk, Andrei Gloskovskii, Xavier Cartoixà, Jordi Suñé, Thomas Schroeder

Abstract

The Ti/HfO2 interface plays a major role for resistance switching performances. However, clear interface engineering strategies to achieve reliable and reproducible switching have been poorly investigated. For this purpose, we present a comprehensive study of the Ti/HfO2 interface by a combined experimental-theoretical approach. Based on the use of oxygen-isotope marked Hf*O2, the oxygen scavenging capability of the Ti layer is clearly proven. More importantly, in line with ab initio theory, the combined HAXPES-Tof-SIMS study of the thin films deposited by MBE clearly establishes a strong impact of the HfO2 thin film morphology on the Ti/HfO2 interface reactivity. Low-temperature deposition is thus seen as a RRAM processing compatible way to establish the critical amount of oxygen vacancies to achieve reproducible and reliable resistance switching performances.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

IHP, Im Technologiepark 25, 15236 Frankfurt an der Oder, Germany

Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY), 22607 Hamburg, Germany

Departament d’Enginyeria Electrònica, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain

Brandenburgische Technische Universität, Konrad-Zuse-Strasse 1, 03046 Cottbus, Germany

Funding

Alexander von Humboldt Foundation

References (25)

Show source-provided references
2. Yu S. · Adv. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 177410.1002/adma.201203680 ↗
3. Waser R. · 2012
4. Gonon P. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 07450710.1063/1.3357283 ↗
5. Xue K.-H. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 110 · 06550210.1103/PhysRevLett.110.065502 ↗
6. Calka P. · Nanotechnology · 2013 · 24 · 08570610.1088/0957-4484/24/8/085706 ↗
7. Chen Y. S. · IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meet. · 2011 · 31.3.1
8. Lee H. Y. · . IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meet. · 2008 · 1
9. Cagli C. · IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meet. · 2011 · 28.7.1
10. Chen P. S. · Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. · 2010 · 13 · H42310.1149/1.3489079 ↗
11. Walczyk C. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B: Nanotechnol. Microelectron.: Mater., Process., Meas., Phenom. · 2011 · 29 · 01AD02
12. Tanuma S. · Surf. Interface Anal. · 1994 · 21 · 16510.1002/sia.740210302 ↗
13. Shukla S. · Nanostruct. Mater. · 1999 · 11 · 118110.1016/S0965-9773(99)00409-2 ↗
14. Sitar Z. · J. Cryst. Growth · 1994 · 141 · 1110.1016/0022-0248(94)90086-8 ↗
15. Bertaud T. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 14350110.1063/1.4756897 ↗
16. Soler J. M. · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2002 · 14 · 2745
17. Perdew J. P. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
18. Adam J. · Acta Crystallogr. · 1959 · 12 · 95110.1107/S0365110X59002742 ↗
19. Hann R. E. · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1985 · 68 · C285
20. Gale J. D. · J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. · 1997 · 93 · 62910.1039/a606455h ↗
21. Gale J. D. · Mol. Simul. · 2003 · 29 · 29110.1080/0892702031000104887 ↗
22. Makov G. · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1995 · 51 · 401410.1103/PhysRevB.51.4014 ↗
23. Rurali R. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 97510.1021/nl802847p ↗
24. Scopel W. L. · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2008 · 77 · 17210110.1103/PhysRevB.77.172101 ↗
25. Broqvist P. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 26290410.1063/1.2424441 ↗