journal article·2015-04-29

Effects of Immobilized BMP-2 and Nanofiber Morphology on In Vitro Osteogenic Differentiation of hMSCs and In Vivo Collagen Assembly of Regenerated Bone

Sajeesh Kumar Madhurakkat Perikamana, Jinkyu Lee, Taufiq Ahmad, Yonghoon Jeong, Do-Gyoon Kim, Kyobum Kim, Heungsoo Shin

Publisher page

Abstract

Engineering bone tissue is particularly challenging because of the distinctive structural features of bone within a complex biochemical environment. In the present study, we fabricated poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA) electrospun nanofibers with random and aligned morphology immobilized with bone morphogenic protein-2 (BMP-2) and investigated how these signals modulate (1) in vitro osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) and (2) in vivo bone growth rate, mechanical properties, and collagen assembly of newly formed bone. The orientation of adherent cells followed the underlying nanofiber morphology; however, nanofiber alignment did not show any difference in alkaline phosphate activity or in calcium mineralization of hMSCs after 14 days of in vitro culture in osteogenic differentiation media. In vivo bone regeneration was significantly higher in the nanofiber implanted groups (approximately 65-79%) as compared to the defect-only group (11.8 ± 0.2%), while no significant difference in bone regeneration was observed between random and aligned groups. However, nanoindentation studies of regenerated bone revealed Young's modulus and contact hardness with anisotropic feature for aligned group as compared to random group. More importantly, structural analysis of collagen at de novo bone showed the ability of nanofiber morphology to guide collagen deposition. SEM and TEM images revealed regular, highly ordered collagen assemblies on aligned nanofibers as compared to random fibers, which showed irregular, randomly organized collagen deposition. Taken together, we conclude that nanofibers in the presence of osteoinductive signals are a potent tool for bone regeneration, and nanofiber alignment can be used for engineering bone tissues with structurally assembled collagen fibers with defined direction.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Division of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States

Division of Bioengineering, College of Life Sciences and Bioengineering, Incheon National University, Incheon 406-772, Republic of Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Jahagirdar R. · Surgery (Oxford) · 2009 · 27 · 6310.1016/j.mpsur.2008.12.011 ↗
2. Mehta M. · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2012 · 64 · 125710.1016/j.addr.2012.05.006 ↗
3. Kini U. · 2012 · 2910.1007/978-3-642-02400-9_2 ↗
4. Viguet-Carrin S. · Osteoporosis Int. · 2006 · 17 · 31910.1007/s00198-005-2035-9 ↗
5. Ramasamy J. · J. Biomech. · 2007 · 40 · 91010.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.03.002 ↗
6. Stevens M. M. · Mater. Today · 2008 · 11 · 1810.1016/S1369-7021(08)70086-5 ↗
7. Murphy C. M. · Eur. Cells Mater. · 2013 · 26 · 12010.22203/eCM.v026a09 ↗
8. Aryal R. · Orthop. Surg. · 2014 · 6 · 17110.1111/os.12112 ↗
9. Lee J.-h. · Drug Delivery Transl. Res. · 2015 · 5 · 14610.1007/s13346-013-0154-y ↗
10. Delgado J. · J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. · 2012 · 23 · 1903
11. Zara J. N. · Tissue Eng., Part A · 2011 · 17 · 138910.1089/ten.tea.2010.0555 ↗
12. Boerckel J. D. · Biomaterials · 2011 · 32 · 524110.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.03.063 ↗
13. Bae S. E. · J. Controlled Release · 2012 · 160 · 67610.1016/j.jconrel.2012.04.021 ↗
14. Li L. · Biomaterials · 2015 · 37 · 21810.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.015 ↗
15. Cho H.-j. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 6 · 1122510.1021/am501391z ↗
16. Ozdemir T. · Curr. Pharm. Des. · 2013 · 19 · 344610.2174/1381612811319190010 ↗
17. Kim D.-H. · J. Cell Biol. · 2012 · 197 · 35110.1083/jcb.201108062 ↗
18. Kim K. · Biomaterials · 2011 · 32 · 375010.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.016 ↗
19. Wang X. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A · 2013 · 101 · 338810.1002/jbm.a.34645 ↗
20. Dhandayuthapani B. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part B · 2010 · 94 · 26410.1002/jbm.b.31651 ↗
21. Biazar E. · Neural Regener. Res. · 2013 · 8 · 2266
22. Sankaran K. K. · Biotechnol. J. · 2015 · 10 · 9610.1002/biot.201400415 ↗
23. Eap S. · Biomed. Mater. Eng. · 2015 · 25 · 79
24. Luo C. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2012 · 41 · 470810.1039/c2cs35083a ↗
25. Corey J. M. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A · 2007 · 83 · 63610.1002/jbm.a.31285 ↗
26. Choi J. S. · Biomaterials · 2008 · 29 · 289910.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.031 ↗
27. Liu W. · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 692810.1021/nn402118s ↗
28. Lyu S. · J. Orthop. Res. · 2013 · 31 · 138210.1002/jor.22367 ↗
29. Kolambkar Y. M. · Tissue Eng., Part A · 2013 · 20 · 39810.1089/ten.tea.2012.0426 ↗
30. Lee J.-h. · Tissue Eng., Part A · 2013 · 20 · 203110.1089/ten.tea.2013.0282 ↗
31. Kim D.-G. · J. Biomech. Eng. · 2010 · 132 · 02450210.1115/1.4000936 ↗
32. Parenteau-Bareil R. · Materials · 2010 · 3 · 186310.3390/ma3031863 ↗
33. Kai D. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part B · 2011 · 98 · 37910.1002/jbm.b.31862 ↗
34. Shin Y. M. · Colloids Surf., B · 2011 · 87 · 7910.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.05.004 ↗
35. Shin Y. M. · Macromol. Mater. Eng. · 2013 · 298 · 55510.1002/mame.201200217 ↗
36. Shin Y. M. · Biomacromolecules · 2012 · 13 · 202010.1021/bm300194b ↗
37. LaVoie M. J. · Nat. Med. · 2005 · 11 · 121410.1038/nm1314 ↗
38. Lee H. · Science · 2007 · 318 · 42610.1126/science.1147241 ↗
39. Mather B. D. · Prog. Polym. Sci. · 2006 · 31 · 48710.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.03.001 ↗
40. Zhou L. · Polym. Chem. · 2014 · 5 · 708110.1039/C4PY00868E ↗
41. Yu B. · Chem. Commun. · 2010 · 46 · 590010.1039/c0cc00596g ↗
42. Driscoll M. K. · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 354610.1021/nn406637c ↗
43. Wise J. K. · Tissue Eng., Part A · 2008 · 15 · 91310.1089/ten.tea.2008.0109 ↗
44. Gupta D. · Acta Biomater. · 2009 · 5 · 256010.1016/j.actbio.2009.01.039 ↗
45. Xie J. · Biomaterials · 2009 · 30 · 35410.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.046 ↗
46. Bakhshandeh B. · Acta Pharmacol. Sin. · 2011 · 32 · 62610.1038/aps.2011.8 ↗
47. Chen J. C. · Stem Cell Res. Ther. · 2013 · 4 · 10710.1186/scrt318 ↗
48. Chen X. · Nanomedicine · 2013 · 9 · 128310.1016/j.nano.2013.04.013 ↗
49. Dyer L. A. · Trends Endocrinol. Metab. · 2014 · 25 · 47210.1016/j.tem.2014.05.003 ↗
50. Gourion-Arsiquaud S. · J. Bone Miner. Res. · 2009 · 24 · 127110.1359/jbmr.090201 ↗
51. Novitskaya E. · Acta Biomater. · 2011 · 7 · 317010.1016/j.actbio.2011.04.025 ↗
52. Seto J. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2008 · 18 · 190510.1002/adfm.200800214 ↗
53. Scaglione S. · Sci. Rep. · 2012 · 2 · 27410.1038/srep00274 ↗