Elasticity, Adhesion, and Tether Extrusion on Breast Cancer Cells Provide a Signature of Their Invasive Potential
Source abstract
Abstract
We use single-cell force spectroscopy to compare elasticity, adhesion, and tether extrusion on four breast cancer cell lines with an increasing invasive potential. We perform cell attachment/detachment experiments either on fibronectin or on another cell using an atomic force microscope. Our study on the membrane tether formation from cancer cells show that they are easier to extrude from aggressive invasive cells. Measured elastic modulus values confirm that more invasive cells are softer. Moreover, the adhesion force increases with the invasive potential. Our results provide a mechanical signature of breast cancer cells that correlates with their invasivity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
ITAV CNRS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse 31062, France
LAAS-CNRS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse 31400, France
Laboratoire d’Analyse et Modélisation pour la Biologie et l’Environnement LAMBE-CNRS, Université d’Evry, Evry F-91025, France
Funding
Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s10555-008-9173-410.1007/s10555-008-9173-4 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.04.00210.1016/j.actbio.2007.04.002 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.07.07810.1016/j.bbrc.2008.07.078 ↗
4. 10.1039/c1sm05532a10.1039/c1sm05532a ↗
5. 10.1371/journal.pone.004660910.1371/journal.pone.0046609 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.micron.2012.01.01910.1016/j.micron.2012.01.019 ↗
7. 10.1038/nnano.2007.38810.1038/nnano.2007.388 ↗
8. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-024710.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0247 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.01.00610.1016/j.ymeth.2013.01.006 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.11.00210.1016/j.ydbio.2014.11.002 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.23810110.1103/PhysRevLett.88.238101 ↗
12. 10.1114/1.152861410.1114/1.1528614 ↗
13. 10.1038/3507309510.1038/35073095 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.02.05810.1016/j.febslet.2014.02.058 ↗
15. 10.1529/biophysj.104.05818010.1529/biophysj.104.058180 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.08.00210.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.08.002 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.04.01910.1016/j.bpj.2013.04.019 ↗
18. 10.1529/biophysj.104.04547610.1529/biophysj.104.045476 ↗
19. 10.1016/0304-3835(96)04112-210.1016/0304-3835(96)04112-2 ↗
20. 10.1007/BF0176858310.1007/BF01768583 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.01610.1016/j.cell.2011.11.016 ↗
22. 10.1038/nrc127610.1038/nrc1276 ↗
23. Liotta L. A. · Cancer Res. · 1976 · 36 · 889
24. 10.1038/ncb197310.1038/ncb1973 ↗
25. 10.1242/jcs.03099910.1242/jcs.030999 ↗
26. 10.1002/pmic.20090072410.1002/pmic.200900724 ↗
27. 10.1038/nchembio.18110.1038/nchembio.181 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.09.02210.1016/j.febslet.2008.09.022 ↗
29. 10.3109/1541906970900445710.3109/15419069709004457 ↗
30. Paredes J. · Cell. Oncol. · 2007 · 29 · 467