Molecular-Scale Hybrid Membranes Derived from Metal-Organic Polyhedra for Gas Separation
Source abstract
Abstract
The preparation and the performance of mixed matrix membranes based on metal-organic polyhedra (MOPs) are reported. MOP fillers can be dispersed as discrete molecular units (average 9 nm in diameter) when low filler cargos are used. In spite of the low doping amount (1.6 wt %), a large performance enhancement in permeability, aging resistance, and selectivity can be achieved. We rationalize this effect on the basis of the large surface to volume ratio of the filler, which leads to excellent dispersion at low concentrations and thus alters polymer packing. Although membranes based only on the polymer component age quickly with time, the performance of the resulting MOP-containing membranes meets the commercial target for postcombustion CO2 capture for more than 100 days.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Covalent Organic Framework Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, KAUST Catalysis Center, Advanced Catalytic Materials, Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia
Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of Technology, Lorentzweg 1, 2628 CJ Delft, The Netherlands
Funding
FP7 Energy
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmat480510.1038/nmat4805 ↗
2. 10.1039/C4CS00437J10.1039/C4CS00437J ↗
3. 10.1126/science.106958010.1126/science.1069580 ↗
4. 10.1002/anie.20170110910.1002/anie.201701109 ↗
5. 10.1021/ja907435c10.1021/ja907435c ↗
6. 10.1002/anie.20110438310.1002/anie.201104383 ↗
7. 10.1002/adfm.20150535210.1002/adfm.201505352 ↗
8. 10.1002/adfm.20120346210.1002/adfm.201203462 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20160383310.1002/adma.201603833 ↗
10. 10.1002/anie.20140223410.1002/anie.201402234 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0290210.1021/acs.chemmater.5b02902 ↗
12. 10.1002/chem.20160299910.1002/chem.201602999 ↗
13. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.7810.1038/natrevmats.2016.78 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20150498210.1002/adma.201504982 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20160699910.1002/adma.201606999 ↗
16. 10.1038/nmat411310.1038/nmat4113 ↗
17. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.8610.1038/nenergy.2017.86 ↗
18. 10.1002/anie.20100614110.1002/anie.201006141 ↗
19. 10.1038/nmat462110.1038/nmat4621 ↗
20. 10.1038/1973410.1038/19734 ↗
21. 10.1038/1974010.1038/19740 ↗
22. 10.1021/ja010435210.1021/ja0104352 ↗
23. 10.1038/nchem.80310.1038/nchem.803 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ccr.2015.05.01610.1016/j.ccr.2015.05.016 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.03.04510.1016/j.memsci.2014.03.045 ↗
26. 10.1039/C4CC05279J10.1039/C4CC05279J ↗
27. 10.1039/C5CC00384A10.1039/C5CC00384A ↗
28. 10.1039/C5TA02286J10.1039/C5TA02286J ↗
29. 10.1002/anie.20120633910.1002/anie.201206339 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.11.02310.1016/j.jcis.2016.11.023 ↗
31. 10.1021/ja803783c10.1021/ja803783c ↗
32. Maxwell J. C. · 1873
33. Boom, J. R. Transport through Zeolite-Filled Polymeric Membranes. Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente, 1994.
34. 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.12.03310.1016/j.memsci.2017.12.033 ↗
35. 10.1002/chem.20180025310.1002/chem.201800253 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.03010.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.030 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.10.04110.1016/j.memsci.2009.10.041 ↗
38. 10.1126/science.aab053010.1126/science.aab0530 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.polymer.2011.05.05210.1016/j.polymer.2011.05.052 ↗