Ni Nanobuffer Layer Provides Light-Weight CNT/Cu Fibers with Superior Robustness, Conductivity, and Ampacity
Source abstract
Abstract
Carbon nanotube (CNT) fiber has not shown its advantage as next-generation light-weight conductor due to the large contact resistance between CNTs, as reflected by its low conductivity and ampacity. Coating CNT fiber with a metal layer like Cu has become an effective solution to this problem. However, the weak CNT–Cu interfacial bonding significantly limits the mechanical and electrical performances. Here, we report that a strong CNT–Cu interface can be formed by introducing a Ni nanobuffer layer before depositing the Cu layer. The Ni nanobuffer layer remarkably promotes the load and heat transfer efficiencies between the CNT fiber and Cu layer and improves the quality of the deposited Cu layer. As a result, the new composite fiber with a 2 μm thick Cu layer can exhibit a superhigh effective strength >800 MPa, electrical conductivity >2 × 107 S/m, and ampacity >1 × 105 A/cm2. The composite fiber can also sustain 10 000 times of bending and continuously work for 100 h at 90% ampacity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · 3D IC and TSV technologies · Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Nano Structural Materials Center, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, United States
Funding
Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China · Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.287.5453.63710.1126/science.287.5453.637 ↗
2. 10.1038/382054a010.1038/382054a0 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.08660110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.086601 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.294110.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2941 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.139663210.1063/1.1396632 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.461310.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4613 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20070077610.1002/adma.200700776 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.06.02910.1016/j.carbon.2013.06.029 ↗
9. 10.1038/nmat107610.1038/nmat1076 ↗
10. 10.1021/nn100731u10.1021/nn100731u ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.16140310.1103/PhysRevB.63.161403 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.12540310.1103/PhysRevB.74.125403 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.109498210.1126/science.1094982 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.09.01910.1016/j.compscitech.2016.09.019 ↗
15. 10.1021/nl070915c10.1021/nl070915c ↗
16. 10.1002/adfm.20160622010.1002/adfm.201606220 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.11.03910.1016/j.carbon.2013.11.039 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20060296610.1002/adma.200602966 ↗
19. 10.1039/c1nr10571j10.1039/c1nr10571j ↗
20. 10.1063/1.350670310.1063/1.3506703 ↗
21. 10.1021/am201729g10.1021/am201729g ↗
22. 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.01.08510.1016/j.carbon.2016.01.085 ↗
23. 10.1166/mex.2012.109210.1166/mex.2012.1092 ↗
24. 10.1002/adfm.20130386510.1002/adfm.201303865 ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20060134410.1002/adma.200601344 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.03.10110.1016/j.carbon.2017.03.101 ↗
27. 10.1038/ncomms320210.1038/ncomms3202 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.08.00410.1016/j.carbon.2017.08.004 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.325501610.1063/1.3255016 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2006.10.00710.1016/j.commatsci.2006.10.007 ↗
31. 10.1007/BF0337759910.1007/BF03377599 ↗
32. 10.1002/adem.20150037910.1002/adem.201500379 ↗
33. 10.1126/science.109290510.1126/science.1092905 ↗
34. 10.1021/nl504889t10.1021/nl504889t ↗
35. 10.1038/419801a10.1038/419801a ↗
36. 10.1088/0957-4484/21/4/04570810.1088/0957-4484/21/4/045708 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.05.01310.1016/j.compscitech.2012.05.013 ↗