Contact Splitting and the Effect of Dimple Depth on Static Friction of Textured Surfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
The morphological texturing of surfaces has demonstrated its high potential to maximize adhesion as well as to reduce friction and wear. A key to understanding such phenomena is a principle known as contact splitting. Here, we extend this concept to the static friction behavior of dimpled surfaces. Our results indicate that contact splitting does exist for such structures and that with certain dimple sizes and depths static friction values significantly exceeding those of untextured surfaces can be obtained. These results can be applied to all surfaces where friction forces are to be tuned, from nanoelectromechanical systems up to combustion engines.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Tribology and Lubrication Engineering · Brake Systems and Friction Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute for Applied Materials IAM, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Kaiserstrasse 12, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
Fraunhofer IWM, Woehlerstrasse 11, 79108 Freiburg, Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Boesel L. F. · Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 212510.1002/adma.200903200 ↗
2. Autumn K. · Nature · 2000 · 405 · 68110.1038/35015073 ↗
3. Autumn K. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2002 · 99 · 1225210.1073/pnas.192252799 ↗
4. Spolenak R. · Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A · 2005 · 461 · 305
5. Huber G. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2005 · 102 · 1629310.1073/pnas.0506328102 ↗
6. Arzt E. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2003 · 100 · 1060310.1073/pnas.1534701100 ↗
7. Greiner C. · Langmuir · 2007 · 23 · 349510.1021/la0633987 ↗
8. Sameoto D. · Smart Mater. Struct. · 2010 · 19 · 10300110.1088/0964-1726/19/10/103001 ↗
9. Varenberg M. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 12190510.1063/1.2356099 ↗
10. Varenberg M. · Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. · 2011 · 103 · 93310.1007/s00339-011-6394-0 ↗
11. Etsion I. · 200910.1007/978-3-642-03653-8_252 ↗
12. Borghi A. · Wear · 2008 · 265 · 104610.1016/j.wear.2008.02.011 ↗
13. Andersson P. · Wear · 2007 · 262 · 36910.1016/j.wear.2006.06.003 ↗
14. Etsion I. · J. Tribol.–Trans. ASME · 2005 · 127 · 24810.1115/1.1828070 ↗
15. Etsion I. · Tribol. Int. · 2009 · 42 · 54210.1016/j.triboint.2008.02.015 ↗
16. Etsion I. · Tribol. Trans. · 1996 · 39 · 67710.1080/10402009608983582 ↗
17. Zum Gahr K. H. · Wear · 2009 · 267 · 124110.1016/j.wear.2008.12.108 ↗
18. Mourier L. · Tribol. Int. · 2006 · 39 · 174510.1016/j.triboint.2006.02.037 ↗
19. Poser K. · Wear · 2005 · 259 · 52910.1016/j.wear.2004.11.007 ↗
20. Rubinstein S. M. · Nature · 2004 · 430 · 100510.1038/nature02830 ↗
21. Rubinstein S. M. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 96 · 25610310.1103/PhysRevLett.96.256103 ↗
22. Ben-David O. · Nature · 2010 · 463 · 7610.1038/nature08676 ↗
23. Bouchbinder E. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 107 · 23550110.1103/PhysRevLett.107.235501 ↗
24. Inglis C. E. · Trans. Inst. Nav. Archit.: Eng. · 1913 · 95 · 415
25. Hull D. · 2011
26. Ben-David O. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 106 · 25430110.1103/PhysRevLett.106.254301 ↗
27. Buhl S. · Int. J. Mater. Res. · 2009 · 100 · 111910.3139/146.110146 ↗
28. Greiner C. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 464010.1021/nl102809k ↗
29. Xuan J. · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1999 · 35 · 243610.1109/20.800850 ↗
30. Tay N. B. · Tribol. Lett. · 2011 · 44 · 16710.1007/s11249-011-9835-1 ↗