journal article·2022-01

Photoelectrocatalytic degradation of caffeine using bismuth vanadate modified with reduced graphene oxide

Thiago M. Prado, Fernando Lindo Silva, Amanda Carrico, Marcos Roberto de Vasconcelos Lanza, Orlando Fatibello-Filho, Fernando C. Moraes

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Bismuth vanadate modified with reduced graphene oxide (BiVO 4 /rGO) was synthesized with the aim of applying this semiconductor material in advanced oxidative processes (AOPs) using the photoelectrocatalytic properties of the material for caffeine degradation. The semiconductor material was characterized by Scanning electronic microscopy, X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy and UV–Vis Diffuse reflectance spectrophotometry. Photo-assisted linear sweep voltammetry experiments were carried out in order to evaluate the photocurrent generated in the processes. BiVO 4/rGO was found to exhibit relatively better photoelectrocatalytic performance compared to bare BiVO4 ; this result confirms the fundamental role of the carbon-based material when it comes to photoanode construction. With regard to caffeine degradation by high performance liquid chromatography through the application of BiVO 4/rGO photoanode, the signal used for monitoring the presence of the analyte exhibited a decrease of 100% of caffeine concentration from the original concentration, indicating the efficient removal of the compound from the sample.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Lintelmann · Pure Appl. Chem. · 2003 · 63110.1351/pac200375050631 ↗
2. Broséus · Water Res. · 2009 · 43 · 470710.1016/j.watres.2009.07.031 ↗
3. Liu · Environ. Prog. Sustainable Energy · 2016 · 35 · 77210.1002/ep.12318 ↗
4. Miralles-Cuevas · Water Res. · 2014 · 64 · 2310.1016/j.watres.2014.06.032 ↗
5. Zigah · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 14 · 1276410.1039/c2cp40907k ↗
6. Fujishima · Nature · 1972 · 238 · 3710.1038/238037a0 ↗
7. Chen · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2010 · 39 · 420610.1039/b921692h ↗
8. Chang · Cataly. Sci. Technol. · 2017 · 7 · 52410.1039/C6CY02150F ↗
9. Fernandez-Domene · J. Environ. Manage. · 2018 · 226 · 24910.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.044 ↗
10. Wahyuningsih · Chem. Pap. · 2014 · 68 · 124810.2478/s11696-013-0476-8 ↗
11. S. Wahyuningsih, A.H. Ramelan, R. Hidayat, G. Fadillah, H. Munawaroh, L. Saputri, Q.A. Hanif, Alternative natural dyes in water purification: anthocyanin as TiO2-sensitizer in rhodamine B photoelectrodegradation, in: T. Omatsu, Y. Hayasaki, Y. Ogura, Y. Ozeki, S. Ohno (Eds.) Biophotonics Japan 2015, 2015.10.1117/12.2204943 ↗
12. Zhou · Chemosphere · 2016 · 165 · 26810.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.08.143 ↗
13. Pilli · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2013 · 15 · 327310.1039/c2cp44577h ↗
14. Dong · F. Xin, Sci Rep, · 2017 · 7 · 110.1038/s41598-016-0028-x ↗
15. do Prado · F.C. Moraes, Mater., · 2020 · 13 · 1
16. Orimolade · Electrocatalysis · 2019 · 10 · 42910.1007/s12678-019-00534-5 ↗
17. Orimolade · J. Electroanal Chem. · 2020 · 878 · 110.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114724 ↗
18. Xia · Appl. Catal. B · 2017 · 204 · 12710.1016/j.apcatb.2016.11.015 ↗
19. Chemelewski · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2014 · 136 · 284310.1021/ja411835a ↗
20. Tsang · Environ. Int. · 2019 · 125 · 20010.1016/j.envint.2019.01.015 ↗
21. Mascaro · J. Solid State Electrochem. · 2015 · 19 · 3110.1007/s10008-014-2495-y ↗
22. Frost · J. Raman Spectrosc. · 2006 · 37 · 72210.1002/jrs.1499 ↗
23. da Silva · J. Solid State Electrochem. · 2012 · 16 · 326710.1007/s10008-012-1765-9 ↗
24. Wang · J. Alloys Compd. · 2015 · 648 · 110910.1016/j.jallcom.2015.05.115 ↗
25. Yeh · H. Teng, Materials Today, · 2013 · 16 · 7810.1016/j.mattod.2013.03.006 ↗
26. Zhang · Mater. Chem. Phys. · 2014 · 147 · 114010.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.06.070 ↗
27. Zeng · Chem. Sus. Chem. · 2011 · 4 · 158710.1002/cssc.201100319 ↗
28. Johnson · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2001 · 35 · 469710.1021/es010171j ↗
29. Archana · Environ. Monit. Assess. · 2017 · 189 · 44610.1007/s10661-017-6148-3 ↗
30. Nodler · Environ. Pollut. · 2016 · 211 · 28210.1016/j.envpol.2016.01.014 ↗
31. Paiga · Mar. Pollut. Bull. · 2017 · 120 · 35510.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.05.030 ↗
32. Sidhu · Sci. Total Environ. · 2013 · 463 · 48810.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.020 ↗
33. Buerge · H.-R. Buser, Environmental Science & Technology, · 2003 · 37 · 69110.1021/es020125z ↗
34. de Araujo · J. Solid State Electrochem. · 2018 · 22 · 153910.1007/s10008-017-3774-1 ↗
35. Ravidhas · Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. · 2015 · 30 · 34310.1016/j.mssp.2014.10.026 ↗
36. do Prado · Electroanalysis · 2018 · 30 · 270410.1002/elan.201800524 ↗
37. Moraes · Carbon · 2015 · 91 · 1110.1016/j.carbon.2015.04.038 ↗
38. Nowak · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2009 · 8010.1063/1.3103603 ↗
39. Lamers · Chem. Mat. · 2018 · 30 · 863010.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03859 ↗
40. Fuhrer · MRS Bull. · 2011 · 35 · 28910.1557/mrs2010.551 ↗
41. Navarra · Journal of Chemistry · 2017 · 201710.1155/2017/6435086 ↗
42. Indermuhle · Chemosphere · 2013 · 93 · 172010.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.05.047 ↗
43. Dalmázio · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2005 · 39 · 598210.1021/es047985v ↗
44. Telo · Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions · 1997 · 2 · 175510.1039/a700944e ↗