journal article·2011-05-25

Cellulose Nanocomposite Biopolymer Foam—Hierarchical Structure Effects on Energy Absorption

Anna. J. Svagan, Lars A. Berglund, Poul Jensen

Publisher page

Abstract

Starch is an attractive biofoam candidate as replacement of expanded polystyrene (EPS) in packaging materials. The main technical problems with starch foam include its hygroscopic nature, sensitivity of its mechanical properties to moisture content, and much lower energy absorption than EPS. In the present study, a starch-based biofoam is for the first time able to reach comparable mechanical properties (E = 32 MPa, compressive yield strength, 630 kPa) to EPS at 50% relative humidity and similar relative density. The reason is the nanocomposite concept in the form of a cellulose nanofiber network reinforcing the hygroscopic amylopectin starch matrix in the cell wall. The biofoams are prepared by the freezing/freeze-drying technique and subjected to compressive loading. Cell structure is characterized by FE-SEM of cross sections. Mechanical properties are related to cell structure and cell wall nanocomposite composition. Hierarchically structured biofoams are demonstrated to be interesting materials with potential for strongly improved mechanical properties.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Wallenberg Wood Science Center and Department of Fibre and Polymer Technology, Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden, and

National Museum Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Vincent J. F. V. · J. Sci. Food Agric. · 1998 · 78 · 16210.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199810)78:2<162::AID-JSFA97>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
2. EUMEPS-European Association of EPS, Av. E. Van Nieuwenhuyse 4/3, B-1160 Brussels, Belgium, website:www.eumeps.org.
3. Myllärinen P. · Carbohydr. Polym. · 2002 · 50 · 35510.1016/S0144-8617(02)00042-5 ↗
4. Dufresne A. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2000 · 76 · 208010.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000628)76:14<2080::AID-APP12>3.0.CO;2-U ↗
5. Anglés M. N. · Macromolecules · 2000 · 33 · 834410.1021/ma0008701 ↗
6. Anglés M. N. · Macromolecules · 2001 · 34 · 292110.1021/ma001555h ↗
7. Svagan A. J. · Biomacromolecules · 2007 · 8 · 255610.1021/bm0703160 ↗
8. Henriksson M. · Eur. Polym. J. · 2007 · 43 · 343410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.038 ↗
9. Favier V. · Macromolecules · 1995 · 28 · 636510.1021/ma00122a053 ↗
10. Svagan A. J. · Adv. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 126310.1002/adma.200701215 ↗
11. Boccaccini A. R. · Compos. Sci. Technol. · 2003 · 63 · 241710.1016/S0266-3538(03)00275-6 ↗
12. Autissier A. · Acta Biomaterialia · 2010 · 6 · 364010.1016/j.actbio.2010.03.004 ↗
13. Lebourg M. · Eur. Polym. J. · 2008 · 44 · 220710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.04.033 ↗
14. Khan F. · Soft Matter · 2009 · 5 · 308110.1039/b907916e ↗
15. Jennings T. A. · 199910.1201/b14424 ↗
16. O’Brien F. J. · Biomater. · 2004 · 25 · 107710.1016/S0142-9612(03)00630-6 ↗
17. Kurz W. · 1986
18. Svagan A. J. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2010 · 20 · 664610.1039/c0jm00779j ↗
19. Gibson L. J. · 199710.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
20. DeHoff R. T. · 1968
21. Hult E.-L. · Cellulose · 2003 · 10 · 10310.1023/A:1024080700873 ↗
22. Ljungberg N. · Biomacromolecules · 2005 · 6 · 273210.1021/bm050222v ↗
23. Tananuwong K. · J. Agric. Food Chem. · 2004 · 52 · 430810.1021/jf049960l ↗
24. Maiti S. K. · Acta Metall. · 1984 · 32 · 196310.1016/0001-6160(84)90177-9 ↗
25. Svagan A. J. · Compos. Sci. Technol. · 2009 · 69 · 50010.1016/j.compscitech.2008.11.016 ↗
26. Rinde J. A. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 1971 · 15 · 137710.1002/app.1971.070150608 ↗