Production of Ag Nanocubes on a Scale of 0.1 g per Batch by Protecting the NaHS-Mediated Polyol Synthesis with Argon
Source abstract
Abstract
Au nanocages synthesized from Ag nanocubes via the galvanic replacement reaction are finding widespread use in a range of applications because of their tunable optical properties. Most of these applications require the use of nanocages with a uniform size and in large quantities. This requirement translates into a demand for scaling up the production of Ag nanocubes with uniform, well-controlled sizes. Here we report such a method based on the modification of NaHS-mediated polyol synthesis with argon protection for fast reduction, which allows for the production of Ag nanocubes on a scale of 0.1 g per batch. The Ag nanocubes had an edge length tunable from 25 to 45 nm together with a size variation within +/-5 nm. The use of argon protection was the key to the success of this scale-up synthesis, suggesting the importance of controlling oxidative etching during synthesis.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Departments of Biomedical Engineering and of Chemistry, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, and Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Science at the Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230027, People’s Republic of China
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Cao Y. W. C. · Science · 2002 · 297 · 153610.1126/science.297.5586.1536 ↗
2. Moore B. D. · Nat. Biotechnol. · 2004 · 22 · 113310.1038/nbt1003 ↗
3. Wiley B. · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2007 · 40 · 106710.1021/ar7000974 ↗
4. Anker J. N. · Nat. Mater. · 2008 · 7 · 44210.1038/nmat2162 ↗
5. Chen J. · Nano Lett. · 2005 · 5 · 47310.1021/nl047950t ↗
6. Chen J. · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 131810.1021/nl070345g ↗
7. Yang X. · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 379810.1021/nl072349r ↗
8. Skrabalak S. E. · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2008 · 41 · 158710.1021/ar800018v ↗
9. Li P.-C. · Opt. Express · 2008 · 16 · 1860510.1364/OE.16.018605 ↗
10. O’Neal D. P. · Cancer Lett. · 2004 · 209 · 17110.1016/j.canlet.2004.02.004 ↗
11. Lu W. · Clin. Cancer Res. · 2009 · 15 · 87610.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1480 ↗
12. Skrabalak S. E. · Nat. Protoc. · 2007 · 2 · 218210.1038/nprot.2007.326 ↗
13. Skrabalak S. E. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 207710.1021/nl800910d ↗
14. Siekkinen A. R. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 432 · 49110.1016/j.cplett.2006.10.095 ↗
15. Wiley B. · Nano Lett. · 2004 · 4 · 173310.1021/nl048912c ↗
16. Taguchi A. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 462 · 9210.1016/j.cplett.2008.07.077 ↗
17. Wiley B. J. · Nano Lett. · 2006 · 6 · 76510.1021/nl060069q ↗
18. Im S. H. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2005 · 44 · 215410.1002/anie.200462208 ↗