UiO-66 Inspired Superhydrophobic Coatings Fabricated from Discarded Polyester/Spandex Textiles
Source abstract
Abstract
We report on a method for synthesizing superhydrophobic coatings using a UiO-66 metal–organic framework (MOF) with discarded polyester/Spandex fabrics as raw materials. Unlike traditional recycling techniques that involve separating non-poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) components, our approach directly uses blended polyester/Spandex fibers. Discarded polyester/Spandex fabrics were exposed to an alkaline depolymerization process to produce disodium terephthalate (Na 2 BDC), which is a known linker for UiO-66 synthesis. We conducted experiments under two different conditions involving different amounts of ethanol. We found that with a small amount of ethanol, the resulting UiO-66 structure, when assembled on top of a polyester/Spandex substrate, exhibited a water contact angle of ≥150°─a superhydrophobic behavior. When using larger amounts of ethanol, we noted a hydrophobic behavior with a water contact angle of ∼139°. As a control, we performed the same experiments but using discarded 100% polyester fabrics as raw materials, which resulted in a superhydrophilic behavior. We attribute the superhydrophobic behavior of the UiO-66 coatings, produced from the polyester/Spandex fabrics, to the presence of hydrophobic compounds generated by the chemical degradation of Spandex. Our approach introduces a pathway for upcycling discarded textiles into superhydrophobic coatings.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Aerogels and thermal insulation · Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Fiber Science Program, Department of Human Centered Design, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United States
Funding
Fulbright U.S. Student Program · Korean-American Educational Commission
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12457910.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124579 ↗
2. 10.1039/D2GC00368F10.1039/D2GC00368F ↗
3. 10.1002/pen.2601710.1002/pen.26017 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12932510.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129325 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41557-019-0249-210.1038/s41557-019-0249-2 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.iecr.3c0022610.1021/acs.iecr.3c00226 ↗
7. 10.1039/C4GC01861C10.1039/C4GC01861C ↗
8. 10.1016/j.desal.2022.11614110.1016/j.desal.2022.116141 ↗
9. 10.1021/jacs.9b0730110.1021/jacs.9b07301 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0094910.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00949 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.7b1539710.1021/acsami.7b15397 ↗
12. 10.1002/ange.20151106310.1002/ange.201511063 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsnano.2c0562410.1021/acsnano.2c05624 ↗
14. 10.1039/D1CC06250F10.1039/D1CC06250F ↗
15. 10.1016/j.susmat.2016.10.00110.1016/j.susmat.2016.10.001 ↗
16. 10.1039/D2GC03663K10.1039/D2GC03663K ↗
17. Szycher M. · 2017 · 18
18. 10.1002/1097-4636(200107)56:1<144::AID-JBM1079>3.0.CO;2-D10.1002/1097-4636(200107)56:1<144::AID-JBM1079>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
19. Alonso J. A. · 1999 · 31
20. 10.1016/j.jece.2023.10943410.1016/j.jece.2023.109434 ↗
21. 10.1039/D2RA03996F10.1039/D2RA03996F ↗
22. 10.1002/pola.2295210.1002/pola.22952 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.seppur.2024.12804310.1016/j.seppur.2024.128043 ↗
24. 10.1039/C8GC02312C10.1039/C8GC02312C ↗
25. 10.1021/acsami.7b0162110.1021/acsami.7b01621 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.03.03810.1016/j.jcis.2018.03.038 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41598-018-22241-910.1038/s41598-018-22241-9 ↗
28. 10.1039/C7RA03801A10.1039/C7RA03801A ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.09.06210.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.09.062 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.12.01410.1016/j.polymer.2014.12.014 ↗
31. 10.1021/ma00158a02310.1021/ma00158a023 ↗
32. 10.1021/ma971234e10.1021/ma971234e ↗
33. 10.1016/S0039-6028(01)01299-710.1016/S0039-6028(01)01299-7 ↗
34. 10.1021/ma00186a01710.1021/ma00186a017 ↗
35. 10.1080/1023666000803464110.1080/10236660008034641 ↗
36. 10.1038/s42004-022-00742-z10.1038/s42004-022-00742-z ↗
37. 10.1039/C7CE00224F10.1039/C7CE00224F ↗
38. 10.1039/D1NR01936H10.1039/D1NR01936H ↗
39. 10.1126/science.aaf207310.1126/science.aaf2073 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.cis.2017.09.00310.1016/j.cis.2017.09.003 ↗
41. 10.1007/s10965-022-03216-x10.1007/s10965-022-03216-x ↗
42. 10.1021/acsanm.9b0126310.1021/acsanm.9b01263 ↗
43. 10.1039/C4TA06191H10.1039/C4TA06191H ↗
44. 10.1021/jacs.1c0140810.1021/jacs.1c01408 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.inoche.2017.12.01110.1016/j.inoche.2017.12.011 ↗
46. 10.1016/0032-3861(87)90037-110.1016/0032-3861(87)90037-1 ↗
47. 10.3390/bioengineering501001410.3390/bioengineering5010014 ↗
48. 10.1002/chem.20230066210.1002/chem.202300662 ↗
49. 10.1166/jnn.2018.1524410.1166/jnn.2018.15244 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.12.06710.1016/j.apsusc.2008.12.067 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.02710.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.027 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.01.04410.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.01.044 ↗
53. NIST Standard Reference Database 20; National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2024.
54. 10.1002/cssc.20220174410.1002/cssc.202201744 ↗
55. Kishor R. · 2018 · 1
56. 10.1039/C8TA02983K10.1039/C8TA02983K ↗
57. Chudgar R. J. · 2015
58. 10.1007/s00289-019-02773-410.1007/s00289-019-02773-4 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.10792010.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107920 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.tca.2019.17834010.1016/j.tca.2019.178340 ↗