journal article·2024-06-12Open access

Physical Properties and Biochemical Composition of Extracellular Matrix-Derived Hydrogels Dictate Vascularization Potential in an Organ-Dependent Fashion

Meng Zhang, Fenghua Zhao, Yuxuan Zhu, Linda A. Brouwer, Hasse Van der Veen, Janette K. Burgess, Martin C. Harmsen

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 23

Abstract

The inherent extracellular matrix (ECM) originating from a specific tissue impacts the process of vascularization, specifically vascular network formation (VNF) orchestrated by endothelial cells (ECs). The specific contribution toward these processes of ECM from highly disparate organs such as the skin and lungs remains a relatively unexplored area. In this study, we compared VNF and ECM remodeling mediated by microvascular ECs within gel, lung, and combinations thereof (hybrid) ECM hydrogels. Irrespective of the EC source, the skin-derived ECM hydrogel exhibited a higher propensity to drive and support VNF compared to both lung and hybrid ECM hydrogels. There were distinct disparities in the physical properties of the three types of hydrogels, including viscoelastic properties and complex architectural configurations, including fiber diameter, pore area, and numbers among the fibers. The hybrid ECM hydrogel properties were unique and not the sum of the component ECM parts. Furthermore, cellular ECM remodeling responses varied with skin ECM hydrogels promoting matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP1) secretion, while hybrid ECM hydrogels exhibited increased MMP9, fibronectin, and collagen IV deposition. Principal component analysis (PCA) indicated that the influence of a gel's mechanical properties on VNF was stronger than the biochemical composition. These data indicate that the organ-specific properties of an ECM dictate its capacity to support VNF, while intriguingly showing that ECs respond to more than just the biochemical constituents of an ECM. The study suggests potential applications in regenerative medicine by strategically selecting ECM origin or combinations to manipulate vascularization, offering promising prospects for enhancing wound healing through pro-regenerative interventions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1 (EA11), Groningen 9713 GZ, The Netherlands

University Medical Center Groningen, W.J. Kolff Institute for Biomedical Engineering and Materials Science-FB41, University of Groningen, A. Deusinglaan 1, Groningen 9713 AV, The Netherlands

University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Biomedical Engineering-FB40, University of Groningen, A. Deusinglaan 1, Groningen 9713 AV, The Netherlands

Department of Computer Science, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180, United States

University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1 (EA11), Groningen 9713 AV, The Netherlands

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek · Chinese Scholarship Councial · Stichting De Cock-Hadders foundation

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1152/physrev.00038.201010.1152/physrev.00038.2010 ↗
2. 10.1038/srep0434810.1038/srep04348 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.05610.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.056 ↗
4. 10.1126/scitranslmed.300933710.1126/scitranslmed.3009337 ↗
5. 10.3390/cells1115243910.3390/cells11152439 ↗
6. 10.1007/s12325-017-0478-y10.1007/s12325-017-0478-y ↗
7. 10.3390/ijms2117630410.3390/ijms21176304 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0117710.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01177 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.06810.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.068 ↗
10. 10.1089/scd.2022.000310.1089/scd.2022.0003 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.09.01310.1016/j.actbio.2008.09.013 ↗
12. 10.3390/polym1318311310.3390/polym13183113 ↗
13. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.0052010.3389/fbioe.2020.00520 ↗
14. 10.1126/science.117600910.1126/science.1176009 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.10084210.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100842 ↗
16. 10.1038/labinvest.378038510.1038/labinvest.3780385 ↗
17. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep1261374810.1111/1523-1747.ep12613748 ↗
18. 10.1080/21691401.2019.160821510.1080/21691401.2019.1608215 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)39038-510.1016/S0021-9258(17)39038-5 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41598-020-67289-810.1038/s41598-020-67289-8 ↗
21. 10.1152/ajplung.00451.201910.1152/ajplung.00451.2019 ↗
22. 10.1152/ajplung.00451.201910.1152/ajplung.00451.2019 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.01510.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.015 ↗
24. Pedregosa F. · J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2011 · 12 · 2825
25. 10.4317/medoral.1857310.4317/medoral.18573 ↗
26. 10.1515/ntrev-2020-007610.1515/ntrev-2020-0076 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.07.03210.1016/j.actbio.2012.07.032 ↗
28. 10.1089/ten.tec.2019.023210.1089/ten.tec.2019.0232 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e0432910.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04329 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.07210.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.072 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2016.05.00110.1016/j.bioactmat.2016.05.001 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.10.01310.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.10.013 ↗
33. 10.1529/biophysj.107.12077410.1529/biophysj.107.120774 ↗
34. 10.1152/ajpcell.00195.201010.1152/ajpcell.00195.2010 ↗
35. 10.1126/scitranslmed.300276110.1126/scitranslmed.3002761 ↗
36. 10.1002/advs.20220148310.1002/advs.202201483 ↗
37. 10.1089/ten.2006.033310.1089/ten.2006.0333 ↗
38. 10.1039/c005069e10.1039/c005069e ↗
39. 10.1002/path.140010.1002/path.1400 ↗
40. 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2002.00057.x10.1046/j.1469-7580.2002.00057.x ↗
41. 10.1093/carcin/20.5.74910.1093/carcin/20.5.749 ↗
42. 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.063510.1089/ten.tea.2009.0635 ↗
43. 10.1091/mbc.e02-01-004810.1091/mbc.e02-01-0048 ↗