journal article·2024-09-18

Correlative Effects of Carbon Support Structures and Surface Properties on ORR Catalytic Activities of Loaded Catalysts

Jin Yang, Yupeng Wu, Jun Shi, Huimin Liu, Zhiqiang Liu, Qinwen You, Xinxin Li, Linchuan Cong, Debo Liu, Fangbing Liu, Yue Jiang, Nan Lin, Wenli Zhang, Haibo Lin

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 37
Publisher page

Abstract

As a complex three-phase heterogeneous catalyst, the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalyst activity is determined by the interfacial and surface structures and chemical state of the catalyst support. As a typical biomass carbon-based support, rice husk-based porous carbon (RHPC) has natural unique hierarchical porous structures, which easily regulate the microstructure and surface properties. This study explored the correlative effects of RHPC structure and surface properties on ORR catalytic activity through the typical modification methods, namely, alkali etching, high temperature, oxidation, and ball milling. The various factors for the joint effects are defined as the specific surface area, oxygen-containing functional groups, graphite edge defects, resistivity, and contact angle. The analysis of such joint influences is difficult to quantitatively evaluate due to the large number of experimental factors and small sample sizes. Partial least-squares (PLS) can better deal with such problems. Therefore, a PLS regression model was established to evaluate the relative weight of each factor on the catalytic activity for the RHPC-based support catalysts. The results reveal that the regression coefficients of four factors yield similar magnitude for the effect of the half-wave potential ( E 1/2 ). However, graphite edge defects had a more significant impact on the limiting diffusion current density ( J ) and electron transfer number ( n ). Furthermore, an optimal support named BM-RHPC-3 was prepared with more defects and oxygen-containing functional groups, which prepared Fe-NS/BM-RHPC-3 presenting the best ORR catalytic activity ( E 1/2 = 0.880 V, J of 5.15 mA cm –2 ), superior to Pt/C ( E 1/2 = 0.844 V, J of 4.99 mA cm –2 ). The statistical regression model is validated with a relative error of less than 5% between predicted and true values for analyzing RHPC-based ORR catalysts’ catalytic performance. It shows the feasibility of experiment-informed learning for data-driven material discovery and design.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Inorganic Synthesis and Preparative Chemistry, College of Chemistry, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China

School of Chemical Engineering & New Energy Materials, Zhuhai College of Science and Technology, Zhuhai 519041, China

Key Laboratory of Bionic Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130025, China

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Biorefinery, School of Chemical Engineering & Light Industry, Guangdong University of Technology GDUT, Guangzhou 510006, China

Guangdong Provincial Laboratory of Chemistry and Fine Chemical Engineering Jieyang Center, Jieyang 515200, China

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China

References (75)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/ja306376s10.1021/ja306376s ↗
2. Tong C. · 2019 · 50310.1007/978-3-319-98002-7_8 ↗
3. Soo Chun, A. M. Intelligent Materials and Technology. In AD Reader Ground Rules for Humanitarian Design, 2015; pp 150–167.10.1002/9781119148784.ch11 ↗
4. 10.1007/s42114-022-00477-410.1007/s42114-022-00477-4 ↗
5. 10.1039/D4TA00555D10.1039/D4TA00555D ↗
6. 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.02910.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.029 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14160710.1016/j.cej.2023.141607 ↗
8. 10.1002/cctc.20150036810.1002/cctc.201500368 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.05.00110.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.05.001 ↗
10. 10.1021/jacs.8b0983410.1021/jacs.8b09834 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41467-019-09596-x10.1038/s41467-019-09596-x ↗
12. 10.1038/s41565-020-00824-w10.1038/s41565-020-00824-w ↗
13. 10.1007/s40820-022-01006-010.1007/s40820-022-01006-0 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.05.11110.1016/j.jcis.2023.05.111 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16792310.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167923 ↗
16. 10.1021/nn302906r10.1021/nn302906r ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.16543910.1103/PhysRevB.85.165439 ↗
18. 10.1039/c2cp41441d10.1039/c2cp41441d ↗
19. 10.1038/s41565-018-0197-910.1038/s41565-018-0197-9 ↗
20. 10.1039/C4CC06781A10.1039/C4CC06781A ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20180058810.1002/adma.201800588 ↗
22. 10.1021/jacs.6b0371410.1021/jacs.6b03714 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.3c1880510.1021/acsami.3c18805 ↗
24. Warren B. E. · 1968
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.1409510.1103/PhysRevB.61.14095 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.02.01810.1016/j.carbon.2005.02.018 ↗
27. 10.1021/cm00011a01810.1021/cm00011a018 ↗
28. 10.1016/0008-6223(94)90148-110.1016/0008-6223(94)90148-1 ↗
29. 10.1002/jrs.640110.1002/jrs.6401 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.167410810.1063/1.1674108 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.cattod.2004.04.01710.1016/j.cattod.2004.04.017 ↗
32. 10.1016/0008-6223(95)00117-V10.1016/0008-6223(95)00117-V ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.03.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2009.03.008 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.envres.2021.11134610.1016/j.envres.2021.111346 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0008-6223(97)00171-110.1016/S0008-6223(97)00171-1 ↗
36. 10.1080/1536383X.2020.179485110.1080/1536383X.2020.1794851 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.07.01510.1016/j.carbon.2011.07.015 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.carbon.2006.11.01910.1016/j.carbon.2006.11.019 ↗
39. 10.1016/S0008-6223(98)00333-910.1016/S0008-6223(98)00333-9 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.10.12610.1016/j.apsusc.2014.10.126 ↗
41. 10.1002/inf2.1227310.1002/inf2.12273 ↗
42. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0434110.1021/acssuschemeng.1c04341 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.03.01310.1016/j.apcatb.2019.03.013 ↗
44. 10.1021/jp503266h10.1021/jp503266h ↗
45. 10.1039/c0jm03613g10.1039/c0jm03613g ↗
46. 10.1039/D2QI02228A10.1039/D2QI02228A ↗
47. 10.1021/jacs.6b1310010.1021/jacs.6b13100 ↗
48. 10.1038/s41467-019-09290-y10.1038/s41467-019-09290-y ↗
49. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10467010.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104670 ↗
50. 10.1039/c3cp55331k10.1039/c3cp55331k ↗
51. 10.1126/science.aan225510.1126/science.aan2255 ↗
52. 10.1039/c2gc35309a10.1039/c2gc35309a ↗
53. 10.1021/jp410501u10.1021/jp410501u ↗
54. 10.1021/jp804413a10.1021/jp804413a ↗
55. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0742910.1021/acsomega.2c07429 ↗
56. 10.1021/la047135t10.1021/la047135t ↗
57. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.08.08610.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.08.086 ↗
58. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0009410.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00094 ↗
59. 10.1007/s12274-020-2994-310.1007/s12274-020-2994-3 ↗
60. 10.1021/cs500744x10.1021/cs500744x ↗
61. 10.1038/s41467-021-27735-110.1038/s41467-021-27735-1 ↗
62. 10.1007/s42114-022-00592-210.1007/s42114-022-00592-2 ↗
63. 10.1021/jp302396g10.1021/jp302396g ↗
64. 10.1002/adma.20200096610.1002/adma.202000966 ↗
65. 10.1149/1.363570210.1149/1.3635702 ↗
66. 10.1021/jz101628410.1021/jz1016284 ↗
67. 10.1002/smtd.20170016710.1002/smtd.201700167 ↗
68. 10.1021/jacs.6b0075710.1021/jacs.6b00757 ↗
69. 10.1007/s10869-014-9351-z10.1007/s10869-014-9351-z ↗
70. 10.1002/app.2067010.1002/app.20670 ↗
71. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.12543510.1103/PhysRevB.79.125435 ↗
72. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.16140610.1103/PhysRevB.82.161406 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.03.02710.1016/j.nanoen.2017.03.027 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.10.20510.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.10.205 ↗
75. 10.1002/aenm.20220361110.1002/aenm.202203611 ↗