journal article·2024-08-28Open access

The Impact of Metal Centers in the M-MOF-74 Series on Formic Acid Production

Dominika O. Wasik, José Manuel Vicent-Luna, Shima Rezaie, Azahara Luna-Triguero, Thijs J. H. Vlugt, Sofía Calero

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 34

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The confinement effect of porous materials on the thermodynamical equilibrium of the CO 2 hydrogenation reaction presents a cost-effective alternative to transition metal catalysts. In metal–organic frameworks, the type of metal center has a greater impact on the enhancement of formic acid production than the scale of confinement resulting from the pore size. The M-MOF-74 series enables a comprehensive study of how different metal centers affect HCOOH production, minimizing the effect of pore size. In this work, molecular simulations were used to analyze the adsorption of HCOOH and the CO 2 hydrogenation reaction in M-MOF-74, where M = Ni, Cu, Co, Fe, Mn, Zn. We combine classical simulations and density functional theory calculations to gain insights into the mechanisms that govern the low coverage adsorption of HCOOH in the surrounding of the metal centers of M-MOF-74. The impact of metal centers on the HCOOH yield was assessed by Monte Carlo simulations in the grand-canonical ensemble, using gas-phase compositions of CO 2, H 2, and HCOOH at chemical equilibrium at 298.15–800 K, 1–60 bar. The performance of M-MOF-74 in HCOOH production follows the same order as the uptake and the heat of HCOOH adsorption: Ni > Co > Fe > Mn > Zn > Cu. Ni-MOF-74 increases the mole fraction of HCOOH by ca. 10 5 times compared to the gas phase at 298.15 K, 60 bar. Ni-MOF-74 has the potential to be more economically attractive for CO 2 conversion than transition metal catalysts, achieving HCOOH production at concentrations comparable to the highest formate levels reported for transition metal catalysts and offering a more valuable molecular form of the product.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Materials Simulation and Modelling, Department of Applied Physics and Science Education, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Eindhoven Institute for Renewable Energy Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, PO Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Energy Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Engineering Thermodynamics, Process & Energy Department, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Leeghwaterstraat 39, 2628CB Delft, The Netherlands

Funding

Eindhoven Institute for Renewable Energy Systems

References (81)

Show source-provided references
1. IEA. CO2 Emissions in 2023, Paris 2024. https://www.iea.org/reports/CO2-emissions-in-2023. Licence: CC BY 4.0. (access date: May 15, 2024).
2. Aresta M. · 2010
3. 10.1039/c2ee21928j10.1039/c2ee21928j ↗
4. Cheremisinoff, N. P.; Rosenfeld, P. E. Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production; William Andrew Publishing: Oxford, 2010; pp 179–259.10.1016/B978-0-08-096446-1.10006-1 ↗
5. Hietala, J.; Vuori, A.; Johnsson, P.; Pollari, I.; Reutemann, W.; Kieczka, H. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2016; pp 1–22.10.1002/14356007.a12_013.pub3 ↗
6. 10.1021/jp062676810.1021/jp0626768 ↗
7. Fact.MR. Formic Acid Market Analysis By Formic Acid of 85% Concentration, 90% Concentration, 94% Concentration, and 99% Concentration from 2023 to 2033. 2023. https://www.factmr.com/report/4279/formic-acid-market. (access date May 15, 2024).
8. 10.1038/ncomms501710.1038/ncomms5017 ↗
9. 10.1007/s11224-018-1264-410.1007/s11224-018-1264-4 ↗
10. 10.1021/om201017210.1021/om2010172 ↗
11. 10.1021/ja203551410.1021/ja2035514 ↗
12. 10.1021/cs400172j10.1021/cs400172j ↗
13. 10.1021/om500832d10.1021/om500832d ↗
14. 10.1039/c003220d10.1039/c003220d ↗
15. 10.1002/chem.20100290710.1002/chem.201002907 ↗
16. 10.1023/A:102216271383710.1023/A:1022162713837 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.catcom.2011.07.01710.1016/j.catcom.2011.07.017 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0536610.1021/acs.jpcc.9b05366 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.132875610.1063/1.1328756 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14343210.1016/j.cej.2023.143432 ↗
21. 10.1002/prs.1006210.1002/prs.10062 ↗
22. 10.1039/b515434k10.1039/b515434k ↗
23. 10.1039/C2DT32138F10.1039/C2DT32138F ↗
24. 10.1002/ange.20050150810.1002/ange.200501508 ↗
25. 10.1166/jnn.2010.149310.1166/jnn.2010.1493 ↗
26. 10.1021/ja807023q10.1021/ja807023q ↗
27. 10.1021/ja045123o10.1021/ja045123o ↗
28. 10.1021/jp510253m10.1021/jp510253m ↗
29. 10.1021/ja056639q10.1021/ja056639q ↗
30. 10.1039/C4SC02064B10.1039/C4SC02064B ↗
31. 10.1126/science.121754410.1126/science.1217544 ↗
32. 10.1021/la703864a10.1021/la703864a ↗
33. 10.1021/ja205976v10.1021/ja205976v ↗
34. 10.1021/ja800669j10.1021/ja800669j ↗
35. 10.1039/C5TA02357B10.1039/C5TA02357B ↗
36. 10.1039/C4TA05794E10.1039/C4TA05794E ↗
37. 10.1021/ie070797410.1021/ie0707974 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.seppur.2024.12653910.1016/j.seppur.2024.126539 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jocs.2015.08.01010.1016/j.jocs.2015.08.010 ↗
40. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0863910.1021/acs.jpcc.8b08639 ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0339310.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03393 ↗
42. 10.1007/s00214-016-2024-410.1007/s00214-016-2024-4 ↗
43. 10.1002/jcc.54007040210.1002/jcc.540070402 ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c0547610.1021/acs.jpcc.2c05476 ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b0009310.1021/acs.jctc.5b00093 ↗
47. 10.1021/j100031a03410.1021/j100031a034 ↗
48. 10.1021/jp810871f10.1021/jp810871f ↗
49. 10.1063/1.47710910.1063/1.477109 ↗
50. 10.1021/j100389a01010.1021/j100389a010 ↗
51. 10.1021/ja00051a04010.1021/ja00051a040 ↗
52. Frenkel D. · 2023
53. 10.1080/08927022.2015.101008210.1080/08927022.2015.1010082 ↗
54. 10.1080/08927022.2013.81910210.1080/08927022.2013.819102 ↗
55. 10.1021/ct700342k10.1021/ct700342k ↗
56. 10.1021/la401035p10.1021/la401035p ↗
57. 10.1021/la900283t10.1021/la900283t ↗
58. 10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/39550210.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502 ↗
59. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
60. 10.1063/1.219022010.1063/1.2190220 ↗
61. 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
62. 10.1039/c3sc51319j10.1039/c3sc51319j ↗
63. 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c0033410.1021/acs.jcim.0c00334 ↗
64. 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c0065210.1021/acs.jcim.1c00652 ↗
65. 10.1021/ct700003910.1021/ct7000039 ↗
66. 10.1002/jcc.2097710.1002/jcc.20977 ↗
67. 10.1080/08927022.2020.182858510.1080/08927022.2020.1828585 ↗
68. 10.1063/1.46644310.1063/1.466443 ↗
69. 10.1080/0026897940010048110.1080/00268979400100481 ↗
70. 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b0009210.1021/acs.jctc.7b00092 ↗
71. 10.1021/i160057a01110.1021/i160057a011 ↗
72. Lemmon, E. W.; Bell, I. H.; Huber, M. L.; McLinden, M. O. NIST Standard Reference Database 23: Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties-REFPROP, Version 10.0, National Institute of Standards and Technology 2018. https://www.nist.gov/srd/refprop.
73. 10.1080/08927022.2018.142685510.1080/08927022.2018.1426855 ↗
74. Haynes W. M. · 201610.1201/9781315380476 ↗
75. 10.1039/tf934300110910.1039/tf9343001109 ↗
76. 10.1021/acsami.9b0901010.1021/acsami.9b09010 ↗
77. 10.1021/cm503818310.1021/cm5038183 ↗
78. 10.1039/D0DT03787G10.1039/D0DT03787G ↗
79. 10.1016/j.cattod.2021.11.02510.1016/j.cattod.2021.11.025 ↗
80. 10.1039/C6TA04388G10.1039/C6TA04388G ↗
81. 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b0397010.1021/acs.iecr.9b03970 ↗