journal article·2023-09-13Open access

Silicon-Based Solid-State Batteries: Electrochemistry and Mechanics to Guide Design and Operation

Pooja Vadhva, Adam M. Boyce, Anisha Patel, Paul R. Shearing, Gregory Offer, Alexander J. E. Rettie

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 15· Issue 36

Abstract

Solid-state batteries (SSBs) are promising alternatives to the incumbent lithium-ion technology; however, they face a unique set of challenges that must be overcome to enable their widespread adoption. These challenges include solid-solid interfaces that are highly resistive, with slow kinetics, and a tendency to form interfacial voids causing diminished cycle life due to fracture and delamination. This modeling study probes the evolution of stresses at the solid electrolyte (SE) solid-solid interfaces, by linking the chemical and mechanical material properties to their electrochemical response, which can be used as a guide to optimize the design and manufacture of silicon (Si) based SSBs. A thin-film solid-state battery consisting of an amorphous Si negative electrode (NE) is studied, which exerts compressive stress on the SE, caused by the lithiation-induced expansion of the Si. By using a 2D chemo-mechanical model, continuum scale simulations are used to probe the effect of applied pressure and C-rate on the stress-strain response of the cell and their impacts on the overall cell capacity. A complex concentration gradient is generated within the Si electrode due to slow diffusion of Li through Si, which leads to localized strains. To reduce the interfacial stress and strain at 100% SOC, operation at moderate C-rates with low applied pressure is desirable. Alternatively, the mechanical properties of the SE could be tailored to optimize cell performance. To reduce Si stress, a SE with a moderate Young's modulus similar to that of lithium phosphorous oxynitride (∼77 GPa) with a low yield strength comparable to sulfides (∼0.67 GPa) should be selected. However, if the reduction in SE stress is of greater concern, then a compliant Young's modulus (∼29 GPa) with a moderate yield strength (1-3 GPa) should be targeted. This study emphasizes the need for SE material selection and the consideration of other cell components in order to optimize the performance of thin film solid-state batteries.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Electrochemical Innovation Lab, Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 7JE, United Kingdom

School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University College Dublin, Dublin, D04 V1W8, Ireland

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 1AY, United Kingdom

The Faraday Institution, Quad One Becquerel Avenue Harwell, Didcot OX11 0RA, United Kingdom

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Royal Academy of Engineering · Faraday Institution · University College London

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41560-020-0565-110.1038/s41560-020-0565-1 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0043110.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00431 ↗
3. 10.1002/AENM.20150106110.1002/AENM.201501061 ↗
4. 10.1002/batt.20210022410.1002/batt.202100224 ↗
5. 10.1002/BATT.20210022410.1002/BATT.202100224 ↗
6. 10.1038/s43246-021-00177-410.1038/s43246-021-00177-4 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41560-018-0312-z10.1038/s41560-018-0312-z ↗
8. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0254210.1021/acsenergylett.8b02542 ↗
9. 10.1002/AENM.20180143010.1002/AENM.201801430 ↗
10. 10.1016/J.JPOWSOUR.2022.23161410.1016/J.JPOWSOUR.2022.231614 ↗
11. 10.1016/J.JOULE.2022.05.01610.1016/J.JOULE.2022.05.016 ↗
12. 10.1149/1945-7111/AC8B3A10.1149/1945-7111/AC8B3A ↗
13. 10.1021/ACSENERGYLETT.1C0044510.1021/ACSENERGYLETT.1C00445 ↗
14. 10.1021/ACS.CHEMREV.0C0010110.1021/ACS.CHEMREV.0C00101 ↗
15. 10.1016/J.SSI.2017.07.00510.1016/J.SSI.2017.07.005 ↗
16. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.14110.1038/nenergy.2016.141 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41563-019-0431-310.1038/s41563-019-0431-3 ↗
18. 10.1039/C7TA02730C10.1039/C7TA02730C ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.22991910.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229919 ↗
20. 10.1016/J.JPOWSOUR.2014.08.10910.1016/J.JPOWSOUR.2014.08.109 ↗
21. 10.48550/ARxIV.2103.0423010.48550/ARxIV.2103.04230 ↗
22. 10.1016/J.ENSM.2018.02.02010.1016/J.ENSM.2018.02.020 ↗
23. 10.1007/S41918-020-00081-410.1007/S41918-020-00081-4 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10534410.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105344 ↗
25. 10.1002/adfm.20070124510.1002/adfm.200701245 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.06.02410.1016/j.ensm.2019.06.024 ↗
27. 10.1039/C7NR06568J10.1039/C7NR06568J ↗
28. 10.1002/AENM.20200132010.1002/AENM.202001320 ↗
29. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab8f5b10.1149/1945-7111/ab8f5b ↗
30. 10.1103/PHYSREVMATERIALS.2.10540710.1103/PHYSREVMATERIALS.2.105407 ↗
31. 10.1039/C7TA03199H10.1039/C7TA03199H ↗
32. 10.1149/2.0371704jes10.1149/2.0371704jes ↗
33. 10.1016/J.JPOWSOUR.2018.02.02610.1016/J.JPOWSOUR.2018.02.026 ↗
34. 10.1002/ADMA.20200075110.1002/ADMA.202000751 ↗
35. 10.1038/s42004-018-0026-y10.1038/s42004-018-0026-y ↗
36. 10.1149/1945-7111/AC955210.1149/1945-7111/AC9552 ↗
37. 10.1021/ACSAMI.9B0253710.1021/ACSAMI.9B02537 ↗
38. 10.1016/J.XCRP.2019.10001210.1016/J.XCRP.2019.100012 ↗
39. 10.1016/J.JPOWSOUR.2021.23067210.1016/J.JPOWSOUR.2021.230672 ↗
40. 10.1007/BF0291343310.1007/BF02913433 ↗
41. 10.1016/J.TWS.2008.05.00210.1016/J.TWS.2008.05.002 ↗
42. 10.1016/J.SSI.2005.02.02510.1016/J.SSI.2005.02.025 ↗
43. 10.1016/J.TSF.2011.07.06810.1016/J.TSF.2011.07.068 ↗
44. 10.1016/J.IJSOLSTR.2015.04.02810.1016/J.IJSOLSTR.2015.04.028 ↗
45. 10.1016/J.JOULE.2022.02.00810.1016/J.JOULE.2022.02.008 ↗
46. 10.1016/J.JOULE.2021.07.00210.1016/J.JOULE.2021.07.002 ↗
47. 10.1039/C9ME00084D10.1039/C9ME00084D ↗
48. 10.1039/C8EE00907D10.1039/C8EE00907D ↗
49. 10.1088/1361-652810.1088/1361-6528 ↗