journal article·2024-07-31Open access

Integrating Mechanics and Bioactivity: A Detailed Assessment of Elasticity and Viscoelasticity at Different Scales in 2D Biofunctionalized PEGDA Hydrogels for Targeted Bone Regeneration

Cristina López-Serrano, Yeva Côté-Paradis, Birgit Habenstein, Antoine Loquet, Cédric Le Coz, Jean Ruel, Gaétan Laroche, Marie-Christine Durrieu

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 30

Abstract

Methods for promoting and controlling the differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) in vitro before in vivo transplantation are crucial for the advancement of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. In this study, we developed poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) hydrogels with tunable mechanical properties, including elasticity and viscoelasticity, coupled with bioactivity achieved through the immobilization of a mixture of RGD and a mimetic peptide of the BMP-2 protein. Despite the key relevance of hydrogel mechanical properties for cell culture, a standard for its characterization has not been proposed, and comparisons between studies are challenging due to the different techniques employed. Here, a comprehensive approach was employed to characterize the elasticity and viscoelasticity of these hydrogels, integrating compression testing, rheology, and atomic force microscopy (AFM) microindentation. Distinct mechanical behaviors were observed across different PEGDA compositions, and some consistent trends across multiple techniques were identified. Using a photoactivated cross-linker, we controlled the functionalization density independently of the mechanical properties. X-ray photoelectrin spectroscopy and fluorescence microscopy were employed to evaluate the functionalization density of the materials before the culturing of hMSCs on them. The cells cultured on all functionalized hydrogels expressed an early osteoblast marker (Runx2) after 2 weeks, even in the absence of a differentiation-inducing medium compared to our controls. Additionally, after only 1 week of culture with osteogenic differentiation medium, cells showed accelerated differentiation, with clear morphological differences observed among cells in the different conditions. Notably, cells on stiff but stress-relaxing hydrogels exhibited an overexpression of the osteocyte marker E11. This suggests that the combination of the functionalization procedure with the mechanical properties of the hydrogel provides a potent approach to promoting the osteogenic differentiation of hMSCs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, CBMN, UMR 5248, Pessac 33600, France

Laboratoire d’Ingénierie de Surface, Centre de Recherche sur les Matériaux Avancés, Département de Génie des Mines, de la Métallurgie et des Matériaux, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1 V 0A6, Canada

Axe médecine régénératrice, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Hôpital St-François d’Assise, Québec, QC G1L 3L5, Canada

Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, IECB, US1, UAR 3033, F-33600 Pessac, France

Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, LCPO, UMR 5629, F-33600 Pessac, France

Département de Génie Mécanique, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche · Universit? de Bordeaux · Centre qu?b?cois sur les mat?riaux fonctionnels · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada · IDEX

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/biot.20130030210.1002/biot.201300302 ↗
2. 10.1007/8415_2010_410.1007/8415_2010_4 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41578-019-0169-110.1038/s41578-019-0169-1 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41586-020-2612-210.1038/s41586-020-2612-2 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41570-022-00420-710.1038/s41570-022-00420-7 ↗
6. 10.1021/acscentsci.9b0121610.1021/acscentsci.9b01216 ↗
7. 10.1039/C7BM00261K10.1039/C7BM00261K ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.04410.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.12.00710.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.12.007 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.02.01610.1016/j.actbio.2016.02.016 ↗
11. 10.1038/nmat333910.1038/nmat3339 ↗
12. 10.1002/jor.2237410.1002/jor.22374 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.04.00310.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.04.003 ↗
14. 10.1039/D2BM00485B10.1039/D2BM00485B ↗
15. 10.1038/s41580-022-00472-z10.1038/s41580-022-00472-z ↗
16. 10.1016/B978-0-08-100803-4.00004-810.1016/B978-0-08-100803-4.00004-8 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.03.03210.1016/j.actbio.2016.03.032 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.02810.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.028 ↗
19. 10.1242/jcs.09322910.1242/jcs.093229 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsabm.8b0023610.1021/acsabm.8b00236 ↗
21. Durrieu, M.C.; Zouani, O. Substituts osseux greffes par des peptides mimetiques de la proteine humaine bmp-2. EP2968660A1, January 20, 2016.
22. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.08.00410.1016/j.actbio.2013.08.004 ↗
23. 10.1002/adhm.20200175710.1002/adhm.202001757 ↗
24. 10.1021/bm400418g10.1021/bm400418g ↗
25. 10.1002/mabi.20210006910.1002/mabi.202100069 ↗
26. 10.1039/C7SM02351K10.1039/C7SM02351K ↗
27. 10.1002/adhm.20230257110.1002/adhm.202302571 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10858-009-9374-310.1007/s10858-009-9374-3 ↗
29. 10.1006/jmre.1999.189610.1006/jmre.1999.1896 ↗
30. 10.1021/ja053016410.1021/ja0530164 ↗
31. 10.1002/jbm.a.3235310.1002/jbm.a.32353 ↗
32. 10.3390/pharmaceutics1504103910.3390/pharmaceutics15041039 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.02410.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.024 ↗
34. 10.1002/jbm.a.3577910.1002/jbm.a.35779 ↗
35. 10.1002/jbm.a.3256310.1002/jbm.a.32563 ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b0111510.1021/acs.macromol.5b01115 ↗
37. 10.1002/mabi.20160047910.1002/mabi.201600479 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.12036910.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120369 ↗
39. 10.1002/macp.20210036610.1002/macp.202100366 ↗
40. 10.1179/1743280413Y.000000002210.1179/1743280413Y.0000000022 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.polymer.2022.12531610.1016/j.polymer.2022.125316 ↗
42. 10.1371/journal.pone.022028110.1371/journal.pone.0220281 ↗
43. 10.1038/s41563-021-00981-w10.1038/s41563-021-00981-w ↗
44. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.02.00410.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.02.004 ↗
45. 10.1007/s11340-021-00712-x10.1007/s11340-021-00712-x ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.biomac.9b0096510.1021/acs.biomac.9b00965 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.10534310.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105343 ↗
48. 10.1039/C5SM01210D10.1039/C5SM01210D ↗
49. 10.1088/0953-8984/22/19/19411610.1088/0953-8984/22/19/194116 ↗
50. 10.1038/ncb356410.1038/ncb3564 ↗
51. 10.1039/C5SM01143D10.1039/C5SM01143D ↗
52. 10.1002/anie.20190788010.1002/anie.201907880 ↗
53. 10.1021/acsami.8b2139310.1021/acsami.8b21393 ↗
54. 10.1002/mabi.20180035110.1002/mabi.201800351 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.12607810.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126078 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.00410.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.004 ↗
57. 10.1039/D3BM00605K10.1039/D3BM00605K ↗
58. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b0049110.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00491 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.01.01910.1016/j.actbio.2011.01.019 ↗
60. 10.1007/s13233-011-0909-610.1007/s13233-011-0909-6 ↗
61. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b0104610.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01046 ↗
62. 10.1038/ncomms736510.1038/ncomms7365 ↗
63. 10.1002/jcb.2023410.1002/jcb.20234 ↗
64. 10.1152/ajpcell.67.200810.1152/ajpcell.67.2008 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.10105810.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101058 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.12254210.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.122542 ↗
67. 10.1007/s00441-009-0832-810.1007/s00441-009-0832-8 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.12198210.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121982 ↗
69. 10.1021/acs.biomac.3c0104510.1021/acs.biomac.3c01045 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.bone.2012.09.04010.1016/j.bone.2012.09.040 ↗