journal article·2024-11-27Open access

Optimizing Carbon Structures in Laser-Induced Graphene Electrodes Using Design of Experiments for Enhanced Electrochemical Sensing Characteristics

Fabiane Fantinelli Franco, Muhammad Hassan Malik, Libu Manjakkal, Ali Roshanghias, Cindy J. Smith, Caroline Gauchotte-Lindsay

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 47

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide In this study, we explored the morphological and electrochemical properties of carbon-based electrodes derived from laser-induced graphene (LIG) and compared them to commercially available graphene-sheet screen-printed electrodes (GS-SPEs). By optimizing the laser parameters (average laser power, speed, and focus) using a design of experiments response surface (DoE-RS) approach, binder-free LIG electrodes were achieved in a single-step process. Traditional trial-and-error methods can be time-consuming and may not capture the interactions between all variables effectively. To address this, we focused on linear resistance and substrate delamination to streamline the DoE-RS optimization process. Two LIGs, designated LIG A and LIG B, were fabricated using distinct and optimized laser settings, which resulted in a sheet resistance of 25 ± 2 Ω/sq and 21 ± 1 Ω/sq, respectively. These LIGs, characterized by scanning electron microscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and contact angle analysis, exhibited a highly porous morphology with 13% pore coverage and a contact angle <50°, which significantly increased their hydrophilicity when compared to the GS-SPE. For the electrochemical studies, the oxidation of NO 2 – ion by the graphene-based working electrodes was investigated, as it allowed for the direct comparison of the LIGs to the GS-SPE. These included cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and differential pulsed voltammetry studies, which revealed that LIG electrodes displayed a remarkable 500% increase in peak current during NO 2 – oxidation compared to the GS-SPE. The LIGs also demonstrated improved stability and sensitivity (420 ± 30 and 570 ± 10 nAμM –1 cm –2 ) compared to the GS-SPE (73 ± 4 nAμM –1 cm –2 ) in the oxidation of NO 2 – ions; however, LIG B was more susceptible to ionic interference than LIG A. These findings highlight the value of applying statistical approaches such as DoE-RS to systematically improve the LIG fabrication process, enabling the rapid production of optimized LIGs that outperform conventional carbon-based electrodes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrochemical sensors and biosensors · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Water and Environment Group, Infrastructure and Environment Division, James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8LT, U.K.

Silicon Austria Laboratories GmbH, Europastrasse 12, A-9524 Villach, Austria

School of Computing and Engineering & the Built Environment, Edinburgh Napier University, Merchiston Campus, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, U.K.

Funding

H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/b923596e10.1039/b923596e ↗
2. 10.1039/D0RA03672B10.1039/D0RA03672B ↗
3. 10.1016/S0013-4686(98)00092-910.1016/S0013-4686(98)00092-9 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.coelec.2017.08.01610.1016/j.coelec.2017.08.016 ↗
5. 10.1039/b313431h10.1039/b313431h ↗
6. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.06910.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.069 ↗
7. 10.1021/cr068076m10.1021/cr068076m ↗
8. 10.1038/ncomms671410.1038/ncomms6714 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20180362110.1002/adma.201803621 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.03.05010.1016/j.carbon.2016.03.050 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.mattod.2023.10.00910.1016/j.mattod.2023.10.009 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.03.01510.1016/j.carbon.2020.03.015 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0853910.1021/acsnano.7b08539 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.0c2027010.1021/acsami.0c20270 ↗
15. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c0270810.1021/acssuschemeng.3c02708 ↗
16. 10.1007/s00604-021-04792-310.1007/s00604-021-04792-3 ↗
17. Mongomery D. C. · 2017
18. 10.1021/acsomega.1c0030910.1021/acsomega.1c00309 ↗
19. 10.1007/s42823-022-00447-210.1007/s42823-022-00447-2 ↗
20. Adiraju, A.; Al-Hamry, A.; Wang, J.; Lu, T.; Pasti, I.; Kanoun, O. Design of Experiments Based Study to Optimize Laster Induced Graphene Surfaces for Electrochemical Sensor Applications. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Impedance Spectroscopy, 2023.10.1109/IWIS61214.2023.10302790.10.1109/IWIS61214.2023.10302790 ↗
21. 10.1007/s40820-020-00496-010.1007/s40820-020-00496-0 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.nantod.2018.12.00310.1016/j.nantod.2018.12.003 ↗
23. 10.3390/bios901001410.3390/bios9010014 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.06.07210.1016/j.nanoen.2018.06.072 ↗
25. 10.1063/5.009330110.1063/5.0093301 ↗
26. 10.1016/S1452-3981(23)05062-910.1016/S1452-3981(23)05062-9 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.12749210.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127492 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.talanta.2016.12.04410.1016/j.talanta.2016.12.044 ↗
29. Nitrate W. H. O. · 2011
30. 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.08.02810.1016/j.talanta.2018.08.028 ↗
31. European Comission · 1998
32. Rice E. W. · 2012
33. 10.1149/2.0171912jes10.1149/2.0171912jes ↗
34. 10.3390/s2001005410.3390/s20010054 ↗
35. 10.1007/s00604-022-05615-910.1007/s00604-022-05615-9 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.11489310.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114893 ↗
37. 10.1109/JFLEX.2023.332945610.1109/JFLEX.2023.3329456 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.bios.2018.10.01510.1016/j.bios.2018.10.015 ↗
39. 10.1002/adfm.20090037710.1002/adfm.200900377 ↗
40. 10.1039/b914412a10.1039/b914412a ↗
41. 10.1016/j.snb.2022.13139410.1016/j.snb.2022.131394 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.12.01610.1016/j.carbon.2019.12.016 ↗
43. 10.1039/B613962K10.1039/B613962K ↗
44. 10.1007/s00604-022-05294-610.1007/s00604-022-05294-6 ↗
45. 10.1021/acsami.8b1099110.1021/acsami.8b10991 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.microc.2022.10736110.1016/j.microc.2022.107361 ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b0036110.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00361 ↗
48. 10.1007/s00216-008-1970-710.1007/s00216-008-1970-7 ↗
49. 10.1039/D2TC01631A10.1039/D2TC01631A ↗
50. 10.1063/5.016264010.1063/5.0162640 ↗
51. 10.1039/C6CS00136J10.1039/C6CS00136J ↗
52. 10.1351/pac19976902029710.1351/pac199769020297 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.01.16410.1016/j.snb.2018.01.164 ↗