BiFeO 3 photocathodes for efficient H 2 O 2 production via charge carrier dynamics engineering
Source abstract
Abstract
Metal oxide semiconductors are promising candidate photoelectrodes for photoelectrochemical H2O2 production if the issues of poor efficiency and selectivity can be resolved. An unfavorable charge transport barrier causes poor carrier collection and kinetics, limiting their efficiency and selectivity. Herein, BiFeO3 was used as the model photocathode, and its interfacial charge transport barrier between fluorine-doped tin oxide substrates was modulated by introducing a LaNiO3 layer as the charge collection layer. Our findings show the significantly enhanced photoelectrochemical activity of the composite photocathode with an improved photocurrent by three times (-0.9 mA cm-2 at 0.6 V vs. RHE) and the H2O2 formation up to 278 μmol L-1 with doubled faradaic efficiency. It is shown that these enhancements are due to the promoted charge carrier collection and kinetics. This work demonstrates the significant role of the charge collection layer in improving the collection and usage of photocarriers to accelerate the application of solar-to-fuel conversion.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Physical Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
Chemical Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Key Science and Technology Foundation of Gansu Province
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Fan · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2020 · 13 · 23810.1039/C9EE02247C ↗
2. Fuku · Chem. Commun. · 2016 · 52 · 540610.1039/C6CC01605G ↗
3. Li · ACS Nano · 2021 · 15 · 1253510.1021/acsnano.1c01590 ↗
4. Gao · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2020 · 30 · 191053910.1002/adfm.201910539 ↗
5. Zheng · Appl. Catal., B · 2018 · 239 · 47510.1016/j.apcatb.2018.08.031 ↗
6. Liu · ACS Energy Lett. · 2019 · 4 · 301810.1021/acsenergylett.9b02199 ↗
7. Sun · Appl. Catal., B · 2022 · 304 · 12098010.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120980 ↗
8. Jeon · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2020 · 13 · 173010.1039/C9EE03154E ↗
9. Chen · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2020 · 8 · 1881610.1039/D0TA05753C ↗
10. Jeon · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2021 · 14 · 311010.1039/D0EE03567J ↗
11. Segev · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2018 · 11 · 90410.1039/C7EE03486E ↗
12. Zhang · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2020 · 30 · 200094810.1002/adfm.202000948 ↗
13. Zhang · ACS Appl. Energy Mater. · 2019 · 2 · 411110.1021/acsaem.9b00297 ↗
14. Pan · Nat. Catal. · 2018 · 1 · 41210.1038/s41929-018-0077-6 ↗
15. Son · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2017 · 10 · 91210.1039/C6EE03613A ↗
16. Song · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2019 · 7 · 918310.1039/C9TA01489F ↗
17. Xie · Nano Energy · 2017 · 31 · 2810.1016/j.nanoen.2016.10.048 ↗
18. Park · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2014 · 16 · 1040810.1039/C4CP01267D ↗
19. Yang · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 11 · 2337210.1021/acsami.9b06704 ↗
20. Yu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2021 · 119 · 01390310.1063/5.0047079 ↗
21. Yang · ACS Nano · 2018 · 12 · 1108810.1021/acsnano.8b05446 ↗
22. Wang · J. Alloys Compd. · 2019 · 784 · 23110.1016/j.jallcom.2019.01.033 ↗
23. Zhang · Mater. Res. Express · 2019 · 6 · 10642010.1088/2053-1591/ab3a71 ↗
24. Li · ACS Nano · 2018 · 12 · 560510.1021/acsnano.8b01351 ↗
25. Jin · RSC Adv. · 2016 · 6 · 7862910.1039/C6RA16388B ↗
26. Jeon · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 072901.1
27. Zhang · Nanomaterials · 2018 · 8 · 71110.3390/nano8090711 ↗
28. Yang · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2016 · 8 · 1647610.1021/acsami.6b04213 ↗
29. Hagfeldt · J. Electroanal. Chem. · 1995 · 381 · 3910.1016/0022-0728(94)03622-A ↗
30. Zhang · Chem. Mater. · 2021 · 33 · 782910.1021/acs.chemmater.1c02444 ↗
31. Berglund · Chem. Mater. · 2016 · 28 · 423110.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00830 ↗
32. Le Formal · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2012 · 116 · 2670710.1021/jp308591k ↗
33. Fan · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2012 · 116 · 242510.1021/jp206798d ↗
34. Jeong · Adv. Mater. Interfaces · 2016 · 3 · 160017610.1002/admi.201600176 ↗
35. Azmi · Microelectron. Eng. · 2018 · 196 · 3210.1016/j.mee.2018.04.020 ↗
36. Averine · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 77 · 27410.1063/1.126948 ↗
37. Guo · Science · 2016 · 351 · 36110.1126/science.aad0832 ↗
38. Cooper · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2018 · 122 · 2064210.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06645 ↗
39. Shenje · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2020 · 124 · 2490810.1021/acs.jpcc.0c08716 ↗
40. Fischer · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2016 · 87 · 03110110.1063/1.4943211 ↗
41. Born · ACS Photonics · 2016 · 3 · 247510.1021/acsphotonics.6b00717 ↗
42. Shi · Nat. Commun. · 2017 · 8 · 70110.1038/s41467-017-00585-6 ↗
43. Bullock · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2017 · 10 · 222210.1039/C7EE01764B ↗