journal article·2021-06-09Open access

Protein Micropatterning in 2.5D: An Approach to Investigate Cellular Responses in Multi-Cue Environments

Cas van der Putten, Antonetta B. C. Buskermolen, Maike Werner, Hannah F. M. Brouwer, Paul A. A. Bartels, Patricia Y. W. Dankers, Carlijn V. C. Bouten, Nicholas A. Kurniawan

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 13· Issue 22

Abstract

The extracellular microenvironment is an important regulator of cell functions. Numerous structural cues present in the cellular microenvironment, such as ligand distribution and substrate topography, have been shown to influence cell behavior. However, the roles of these cues are often studied individually using simplified, single-cue platforms that lack the complexity of the three-dimensional, multi-cue environment cells encounter in vivo. Developing ways to bridge this gap, while still allowing mechanistic investigation into the cellular response, represents a critical step to advance the field. Here, we present a new approach to address this need by combining optics-based protein patterning and lithography-based substrate microfabrication, which enables high-throughput investigation of complex cellular environments. Using a contactless and maskless UV-projection system, we created patterns of extracellular proteins (resembling contact-guidance cues) on a two-and-a-half-dimensional (2.5D) cell culture chip containing a library of well-defined microstructures (resembling topographical cues). As a first step, we optimized experimental parameters of the patterning protocol for the patterning of protein matrixes on planar and non-planar (2.5D cell culture chip) substrates and tested the technique with adherent cells (human bone marrow stromal cells). Next, we fine-tuned protein incubation conditions for two different vascular-derived human cell types (myofibroblasts and umbilical vein endothelial cells) and quantified the orientation response of these cells on the 2.5D, physiologically relevant multi-cue environments. On concave, patterned structures (curvatures between = 1/2500 and = 1/125 m -1 ), both cell types predominantly oriented in the direction of the contact-guidance pattern. In contrast, for human myofibroblasts on micropatterned convex substrates with higher curvatures ( 1/ 1000 m -1 ), the majority of cells aligned along the longitudinal direction of the 2.5D features, indicating that these cells followed the structural cues from the substrate curvature instead. These findings exemplify the potential of this approach for systematic investigation of cellular responses to multiple microenvironmental cues.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Funding

Hartstichting · Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen · Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap · H2020 European Research Council · Technische Universiteit Eindhoven · Chemelot InSciTe · Royal Netherlands Academy of Sciences · Dutch Federation of University Medical Centers · Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1242/jcs.02382010.1242/jcs.023820 ↗
2. 10.1098/rsif.2013.017910.1098/rsif.2013.0179 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.06.01510.1016/j.devcel.2011.06.015 ↗
4. 10.1038/nrm259710.1038/nrm2597 ↗
5. 10.1242/jcs.0038310.1242/jcs.00383 ↗
6. 10.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2006.06.00210.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2006.06.002 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00144-010.1016/S0142-9612(97)00144-0 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10544-007-9060-810.1007/s10544-007-9060-8 ↗
9. 10.1039/C6RA25739A10.1039/C6RA25739A ↗
10. 10.1016/J.BIOTECHADV.2013.11.00710.1016/J.BIOTECHADV.2013.11.007 ↗
11. 10.1242/jcs.19616210.1242/jcs.196162 ↗
12. 10.1088/0953-8984/28/18/18300110.1088/0953-8984/28/18/183001 ↗
13. 10.1038/srep0875210.1038/srep08752 ↗
14. 10.1039/B613349E10.1039/B613349E ↗
15. 10.1039/b9py00281b10.1039/b9py00281b ↗
16. 10.1039/b821581m10.1039/b821581m ↗
17. 10.1038/ncb226910.1038/ncb2269 ↗
18. 10.1242/jcs.10490110.1242/jcs.104901 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41556-017-0005-z10.1038/s41556-017-0005-z ↗
20. 10.1073/PNAS.090326910710.1073/PNAS.0903269107 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.505223910.1063/1.5052239 ↗
22. 10.1002/cm.2012610.1002/cm.20126 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.10005510.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100055 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.01.00610.1016/j.tibtech.2019.01.006 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00135-010.1016/S0021-9290(03)00135-0 ↗
26. Boron W. F. · 2005
27. 10.1021/bm401641810.1021/bm4016418 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10544-009-9287-710.1007/s10544-009-9287-7 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.12.01110.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.12.011 ↗
30. 10.1002/adma.20100353810.1002/adma.201003538 ↗
31. Nguyen N.-T. · 2012
32. McMurray R. · 2011
33. 10.1016/J.BIOACTMAT.2018.05.00510.1016/J.BIOACTMAT.2018.05.005 ↗
34. 10.1098/rsob.19015510.1098/rsob.190155 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.01410.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.014 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.11973910.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119739 ↗
37. 10.1098/rsif.2018.016210.1098/rsif.2018.0162 ↗
38. 10.1002/adbi.20190008010.1002/adbi.201900080 ↗
39. 10.3390/ma1304096310.3390/ma13040963 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.eml.2018.01.00410.1016/j.eml.2018.01.004 ↗
41. 10.1242/jcs.02684910.1242/jcs.026849 ↗
42. 10.1073/pnas.060926710310.1073/pnas.0609267103 ↗
43. 10.1126/science.276.5317.142510.1126/science.276.5317.1425 ↗
44. 10.1242/jcs.07515010.1242/jcs.075150 ↗
45. 10.1002/adbi.20170013510.1002/adbi.201700135 ↗
46. 10.1002/advs.20160034710.1002/advs.201600347 ↗
47. 10.1002/adfm.20130109310.1002/adfm.201301093 ↗
48. 10.1242/jcs.0083610.1242/jcs.00836 ↗
49. 10.1002/cpcb.2510.1002/cpcb.25 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.04310.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.043 ↗
51. 10.1152/physrev.00041.200810.1152/physrev.00041.2008 ↗
52. 10.1002/adma.20150415410.1002/adma.201504154 ↗
53. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.00112310.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.001123 ↗
54. 10.1371/journal.pone.019520110.1371/journal.pone.0195201 ↗
55. 10.1063/1.503517610.1063/1.5035176 ↗
56. 10.1021/acsomega.8b0360810.1021/acsomega.8b03608 ↗
57. 10.1088/1478-3975/6/4/04601010.1088/1478-3975/6/4/046010 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.03410.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.034 ↗
59. 10.1152/physrev.00013.201910.1152/physrev.00013.2019 ↗
60. 10.1126/science.111699510.1126/science.1116995 ↗
61. 10.1088/0960-1317/24/3/03501710.1088/0960-1317/24/3/035017 ↗
62. 10.1371/journal.pone.007928310.1371/journal.pone.0079283 ↗
63. 10.3791/6009210.3791/60092 ↗
64. 10.1038/nrm259310.1038/nrm2593 ↗