journal article·2023-09-06Open access

Heteroatom-Doped Carbon Quantum Dots and Polymer Composite as Dual-Mode Nanoprobe for Fluorometric and Colorimetric Determination of Picric Acid

Ömer Kaan Koç, Ayşem Üzer, Reşat Apak

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 15· Issue 35

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Oxygen- and nitrogen-heteroatom-doped, water-dispersible, and bright blue-fluorescent carbon dots (ON–CDs) were prepared for the selective and sensitive determination of 2,4,6-trinitrophenol (picric acid, PA). ON–CDs with 49.7% quantum yield were one-pot manufactured by the reflux method using citric acid, d -glucose, and ethylenediamine precursors. The surface morphology of ON–CDs was determined by scanning transmission electron microscopy, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering, Raman, infrared, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy techniques, and their photophysical properties were estimated by fluorescence spectroscopy, UV–vis spectroscopy, fluorescence lifetime measurement, and 3D-fluorescence excitation–emission matrix analysis. ON–CDs at an average particle size of 3.0 nm had excitation/emission wavelengths of 355 and 455 nm, respectively. With the dominant inner-filter effect- and hydrogen-bonding interaction-based static fluorescence quenching phenomena supported by ground-state charge-transfer complexation (CTC), the fluorescence of ON–CDs was selectively quenched with PA in the presence of various types of explosives (i.e., 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene, tetryl, 1,3,5-trinitroperhydro–1,3,5-triazine, 1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetraazacyclooctane, pentaerythritol tetranitrate, 3-nitro-1,2,4-triazole-5-one, and TATP-hydrolyzed H 2 O 2 ). The analytical results showed that the emission intensity varied linearly with a correlation coefficient of 0.9987 over a PA concentration range from 1.0 × 10 –9 to 11.0 × 10 –9 M. As a result of ground-state interaction (H-bonding and CTC) of ON–CDs with PA, an orange-colored complex was formed different from the characteristic yellow color of PA in an aqueous medium, allowing naked-eye detection of PA. The detection limits for PA with ON–CDs were 12.5 × 10 –12 M (12.5 pM) by emission measurement and 9.0 × 10 –10 M (0.9 nM) by absorption measurement. In the presence of synthetic explosive mixtures, common soil cations/anions, and camouflage materials, PA was recovered in the range of 95.2 and 102.5%. The developed method was statistically validated against a reference liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry method applied to PA-contaminated soil. In addition, a poly(vinyl alcohol)-based polymer composite film {PF(ON–CDs)} was prepared by incorporating ON–CDs, enabling the smartphone-assisted fluorometric detection of PA.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications · Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications · Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Graduate Studies, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Avcilar, Istanbul 34320, Turkey

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Avcilar, Istanbul 34320, Turkey

Bayraktar Neighborhood, Turkish Academy of Sciences (TUBA), Vedat Dalokay Street No: 112, Çankaya, Ankara 06690, Turkey

Funding

T??rkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.aca.2018.01.04910.1016/j.aca.2018.01.049 ↗
2. 10.1039/c2cc31606d10.1039/c2cc31606d ↗
3. 10.1039/C6CE00244G10.1039/C6CE00244G ↗
4. 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6521(1997)1:3<165::AID-FACT6>3.0.CO;2-W10.1002/(SICI)1520-6521(1997)1:3<165::AID-FACT6>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.11220110.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.112201 ↗
6. 10.1039/c1cc10400d10.1039/c1cc10400d ↗
7. 10.1128/AEM.70.5.2854-2860.200410.1128/AEM.70.5.2854-2860.2004 ↗
8. 10.1002/jssc.20120061410.1002/jssc.201200614 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.snb.2004.02.01010.1016/j.snb.2004.02.010 ↗
10. 10.1021/jp501019210.1021/jp5010192 ↗
11. 10.1039/C7PY01579H10.1039/C7PY01579H ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.12909010.1016/j.cej.2021.129090 ↗
13. 10.1021/ma201003f10.1021/ma201003f ↗
14. 10.1039/C7TC00936D10.1039/C7TC00936D ↗
15. 10.1016/j.mattod.2015.04.00510.1016/j.mattod.2015.04.005 ↗
16. 10.1039/C3TC30670D10.1039/C3TC30670D ↗
17. 10.1039/C3RA47683A10.1039/C3RA47683A ↗
18. 10.1038/3500353510.1038/35003535 ↗
19. 10.1038/srep0147310.1038/srep01473 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0557510.1021/acsnano.5b05575 ↗
21. 10.1002/anie.20090615410.1002/anie.200906154 ↗
22. 10.1021/ja203674910.1021/ja2036749 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2013.03.01510.1016/j.materresbull.2013.03.015 ↗
24. 10.1039/C1CC15678K10.1039/C1CC15678K ↗
25. 10.1039/c3ra45294h10.1039/c3ra45294h ↗
26. 10.1016/j.bios.2015.12.08410.1016/j.bios.2015.12.084 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b0201310.1021/acs.analchem.7b02013 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.08.00710.1016/j.forsciint.2013.08.007 ↗
29. 10.1002/advs.20190131610.1002/advs.201901316 ↗
30. 10.1002/ange.20130111410.1002/ange.201301114 ↗
31. 10.1039/C8AY00441B10.1039/C8AY00441B ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.est.6b0417810.1021/acs.est.6b04178 ↗
33. 10.1149/2.0091801jss10.1149/2.0091801jss ↗
34. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.12.00410.1016/j.carbon.2017.12.004 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.optmat.2016.11.02610.1016/j.optmat.2016.11.026 ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0491510.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04915 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.bios.2015.12.08710.1016/j.bios.2015.12.087 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.snb.2016.10.09110.1016/j.snb.2016.10.091 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.11782110.1016/j.fuel.2020.117821 ↗
40. 10.1039/c3ay41275j10.1039/c3ay41275j ↗
41. 10.1039/c2an35130g10.1039/c2an35130g ↗
42. 10.1002/ppsc.20210020110.1002/ppsc.202100201 ↗
43. 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)03508-110.1016/S0014-5793(02)03508-1 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.aca.2017.10.02610.1016/j.aca.2017.10.026 ↗
45. 10.1002/chem.20140218910.1002/chem.201402189 ↗
46. 10.1039/D1NJ02908H10.1039/D1NJ02908H ↗