journal article·2022-06-29Open access

Al2O3/ZnO Heterostructure-Based Sensors for Volatile Organic Compounds in Safety Applications

Oleg Lupan, David Santos-Carballal, Nicolae Magariu, Abhishek Kumar Mishra, Nicolai Ababii, Helge Krüger, Niklas Wolff, Alexander Vahl, Mani Teja Bodduluri, Niklas Kohlmann, Lorenz Kienle, Rainer Adelung, Nora H. de Leeuw, Sandra Hansen

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 14· Issue 25

Abstract

Monitoring volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in harsh environments, especially for safety applications, is a growing field that requires specialized sensor structures. In this work, we demonstrate the sensing properties toward the most common VOCs of columnar Al2O3/ZnO heterolayer-based sensors. We have also developed an approach to tune the sensor selectivity by changing the thickness of the exposed amorphous Al2O3 layer from 5 to 18 nm. Columnar ZnO films are prepared by a chemical solution method, where the exposed surface is decorated with an Al2O3 nanolayer via thermal atomic layer deposition at 75 °C. We have investigated the structure and morphology as well as the vibrational, chemical, electronic, and sensor properties of the Al2O3/ZnO heterostructures. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) studies show that the upper layers consist of amorphous Al2O3 films. The heterostructures showed selectivity to 2-propanol vapors only within the range of 12–15 nm thicknesses of Al2O3, with the highest response value of ∼2000% reported for a thickness of 15 nm at the optimal working temperature of 350 °C. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations of the Al2O3/ZnO(1010) interface and its interaction with 2-propanol (2-C3H7OH), n-butanol (n-C4H9OH), ethanol (C2H5OH), acetone (CH3COCH3), hydrogen (H2), and ammonia (NH3) show that the molecular affinity for the Al2O3/ZnO(1010) interface decreases from 2-propanol (2-C3H7OH) ≈ n-butanol (n-C4H9OH) > ethanol (C2H5OH) > acetone (CH3COCH3) > hydrogen (H2), which is consistent with our gas response experiments for the VOCs. Charge transfers between the surface and the adsorbates, and local densities of states of the interacting atoms, support the calculated strength of the molecular preferences. Our findings are highly important for the development of 2-propanol sensors and to our understanding of the effect of the heterojunction and the thickness of the top nanolayer on the gas response, which thus far have not been reported in the literature.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · ZnO doping and properties · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science, Chair for Functional Nanomaterials, Faculty of Engineering, Christian-Albrechts Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Kaiserstraße 2, D-24143 Kiel, Germany

Center for Nanotechnology and Nanosensors, Department of Microelectronics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Computers, Informatics and Microelectronics, Technical University of Moldova, 168 Stefan cel Mare str., MD-2004 Chisinau, Republic of Moldova

Department of Physics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida 32816-2385, United States

School of Chemistry, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom

Department of Physics, School of Engineering, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies (UPES), Energy Acres Building, Bidholi, Dehradun 248007, Uttrakhand, India

Department of Materials Science, Chair for Synthesis and Real Structure, Faculty of Engineering, Christian-Albrechts Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Kaiserstraße 2, D-24143 Kiel, Germany

Department of Materials Science, Chair for Multicomponent Materials, Faculty of Engineering, Christian-Albrechts Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Kaiserstraße 2, D-24143 Kiel, Germany

Fraunhofer Institute for Silicon Technology (ISIT), Itzehoe, Fraunhoferstraße 1, Itzehoe D-25524, Germany

Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, Princetonlaan 8a, 3584 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · EUSH · WTSH and the EUSH · NATO Science for Peace and Security Programme · Federal Ministry of Education and Research Germany

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/s1902023310.3390/s19020233 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.aca.2018.09.02010.1016/j.aca.2018.09.020 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.snb.2015.08.00310.1016/j.snb.2015.08.003 ↗
4. 10.1007/s13391-018-0044-z10.1007/s13391-018-0044-z ↗
5. 10.1016/j.sna.2021.11280410.1016/j.sna.2021.112804 ↗
6. 10.3390/s2003057910.3390/s20030579 ↗
7. 10.1039/C6TA01355D10.1039/C6TA01355D ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.0c0210310.1021/acsami.0c02103 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.snb.2010.10.04610.1016/j.snb.2010.10.046 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsami.1c1867910.1021/acsami.1c18679 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.8b1193010.1021/acsami.8b11930 ↗
12. 10.15541/jim2018035210.15541/jim20180352 ↗
13. 10.1038/micronano.2016.4810.1038/micronano.2016.48 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.sna.2019.04.01710.1016/j.sna.2019.04.017 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.509858710.1063/1.5098587 ↗
16. 10.1002/admi.20190123910.1002/admi.201901239 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.12715010.1016/j.snb.2019.127150 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.05.03210.1016/j.snb.2019.05.032 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.6b0111610.1021/acsami.6b01116 ↗
20. 10.1111/jace.1581810.1111/jace.15818 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.08.01410.1016/j.solmat.2017.08.014 ↗
22. 10.1021/cm071568a10.1021/cm071568a ↗
23. 10.1002/1521-4095(20020318)14:6<418::AID-ADMA418>3.0.CO;2-K10.1002/1521-4095(20020318)14:6<418::AID-ADMA418>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
24. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2008.04.00610.1016/j.materresbull.2008.04.006 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.10.10410.1016/j.tsf.2007.10.104 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.04.00410.1016/j.tsf.2005.04.004 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.spmi.2007.04.00910.1016/j.spmi.2007.04.009 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.snb.2004.10.03010.1016/j.snb.2004.10.030 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.snb.2005.03.06110.1016/j.snb.2005.03.061 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.01.20610.1016/j.snb.2018.01.206 ↗
31. Gapeeva A. · 2020 · 77 · 263
32. Moulder, J. F.; Stickle, W. F.; Sobol, P. E.; Bomben, K. D. Handbook of X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy; Perkin-Elmer Corporation: Eden Prairie, MN, 1992; pp 52–53.
33. 10.1021/acsami.0c1917010.1021/acsami.0c19170 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.1425110.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 ↗
39. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
41. 10.1039/C8TA08985J10.1039/C8TA08985J ↗
42. 10.1039/D0TA03224G10.1039/D0TA03224G ↗
43. 10.1021/acsami.9b0727510.1021/acsami.9b07275 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
45. 10.1021/jp056444510.1021/jp0564445 ↗
46. 10.1016/S0039-6028(00)00794-910.1016/S0039-6028(00)00794-9 ↗
47. 10.1002/jcc.2049510.1002/jcc.20495 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.01010.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.010 ↗
49. 10.1016/S0166-1280(96)90925-210.1016/S0166-1280(96)90925-2 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.09210110.1103/PhysRevB.65.092101 ↗
51. 10.1002/pssa.20170077210.1002/pssa.201700772 ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.16520210.1103/PhysRevB.75.165202 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.mssp.2016.03.02410.1016/j.mssp.2016.03.024 ↗
54. Naumkin, A. V.; Kraust-Vass, A.; Gaarenstroom, S. W.; Powell, C. J. NIST X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Database, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
55. 10.1557/mrs2007.4710.1557/mrs2007.47 ↗
56. 10.1126/science.105812010.1126/science.1058120 ↗
57. 10.3390/nano811091710.3390/nano8110917 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.snb.2017.01.10710.1016/j.snb.2017.01.107 ↗
59. 10.1088/1361-6528/ab083710.1088/1361-6528/ab0837 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.snb.2015.10.04210.1016/j.snb.2015.10.042 ↗
61. 10.1002/admt.20200113710.1002/admt.202001137 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.02.09910.1016/j.ceramint.2016.02.099 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10624110.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106241 ↗