Designing Efficient Si Quantum Dots and LEDs by Quantifying Ligand Effects
Source abstract
Abstract
The impact of colloidal silicon quantum dots (SiQDs) on next-generation light sources is promising. However, factors determining the efficiency of SiQDs, such as the photoluminescence (PL) wavelength, PL quantum yield (PLQY), and the SiQD LED performance based on the type of ligand, ligand coverage, stress, and dangling bonds, have not been quantified. Characterizing these variables would accelerate the design and implementation of SiQDs. Herein, colloidal SiQDs were synthesized by pyrolyzing hydrogen silsesquioxane and their surfaces were terminated with 1-decene by either thermal hydrosilylation (HT-SiQDs) or room-temperature hydrosilylation using PCl5 (RT-SiQD). As a result, PL, PL-excitation, and ultraviolet–visible absorption spectra were similar, but their PLQYs were significantly different: 54% (RT-SiQDs) vs 19% (HT-SiQDs). To understand their similarities and differences, surface coverages (dangling bonds, Si–H (≡Si–H1, ═Si–H2, and −Si–H3), Si–O–Si, Si–C, Si–Cl) were determined. A core stress analysis established that a single ligand terminated to a SiQD bond site stretched the Si–Si bond length by 0.3%. From the two well-defined SiQDs, the PLQY and SiQD LED efficiency were attributed to four factors: low coverage of insulator ligands, the Cl ligand effect on radiative and nonradiative rates, negligible dangling bonds, and a SiQD core with low tensile stress. The PLQY of the RT-SiQDs in toluene was 80%. In addition, the 20× electroluminescence intensity difference of the LEDs originated from a 10× difference in current density and a 2× difference in Auger recombination. The concepts demonstrated here can be applied to further improve the PLQY and LED efficiencies of SiQDs with other ligands.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence · Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications · Semiconductor materials and devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Hiroshima University, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan
Natural Science Center for Basic Research and Development (N-BARD), Hiroshima University, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan
Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan
References (85)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.10356110.1063/1.103561 ↗
2. 10.1039/D0FD00018C10.1039/D0FD00018C ↗
3. Lockwood D. J. · 1998
4. 10.1016/0370-1573(95)00021-410.1016/0370-1573(95)00021-4 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.19710.1103/PhysRevLett.82.197 ↗
6. 10.1039/b607476f10.1039/b607476f ↗
7. 10.1002/ppsc.20150014810.1002/ppsc.201500148 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.258.5085.113110.1126/science.258.5085.1131 ↗
9. 10.1021/nl049737310.1021/nl0497373 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0311310.1021/acsnano.6b03113 ↗
11. 10.1021/cm060280310.1021/cm0602803 ↗
12. 10.1021/cm203286610.1021/cm2032866 ↗
13. 10.1021/nn504109a10.1021/nn504109a ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0011510.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00115 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0124610.1021/acs.langmuir.5b01246 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b0051810.1021/acs.langmuir.7b00518 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0805410.1021/acs.jpcc.7b08054 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0266710.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02667 ↗
19. 10.1021/ph500221z10.1021/ph500221z ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0232010.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02320 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0003910.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00039 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0461010.1021/acsnano.9b04610 ↗
23. 10.1021/jp900067s10.1021/jp900067s ↗
24. 10.1021/jp210080k10.1021/jp210080k ↗
25. 10.1063/1.492141510.1063/1.4921415 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cplett.2017.02.06010.1016/j.cplett.2017.02.060 ↗
27. 10.1021/cr00037a01210.1021/cr00037a012 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsphotonics.5b0014310.1021/acsphotonics.5b00143 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0068010.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00680 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0327310.1021/acsnano.8b03273 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0044310.1021/acs.chemmater.0c00443 ↗
32. 10.1021/nl071486l10.1021/nl071486l ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.1594210.1103/PhysRevB.62.15942 ↗
34. 10.1021/nl203619410.1021/nl2036194 ↗
35. 10.1021/jp070908c10.1021/jp070908c ↗
36. 10.1038/srep1246910.1038/srep12469 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.221078810.1063/1.2210788 ↗
38. 10.1007/s11051-013-1535-310.1007/s11051-013-1535-3 ↗
39. 10.1021/ja992188w10.1021/ja992188w ↗
40. 10.1063/1.161835810.1063/1.1618358 ↗
41. 10.1002/adma.20070059510.1002/adma.200700595 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.11.12810.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.11.128 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.07.08510.1016/j.tsf.2010.07.085 ↗
44. 10.1149/1.220212010.1149/1.2202120 ↗
45. 10.1039/C8RA08816K10.1039/C8RA08816K ↗
46. 10.1021/cr000064s10.1021/cr000064s ↗
47. 10.1039/a900108e10.1039/a900108e ↗
48. 10.1002/1521-4095(200010)12:19<1457::AID-ADMA1457>3.0.CO;2-#10.1002/1521-4095(200010)12:19<1457::AID-ADMA1457>3.0.CO;2-# ↗
49. 10.1116/1.58152010.1116/1.581520 ↗
50. 10.1063/1.37210310.1063/1.372103 ↗
51. 10.1063/1.139860110.1063/1.1398601 ↗
52. 10.1063/1.503700810.1063/1.5037008 ↗
53. 10.1063/1.487817510.1063/1.4878175 ↗
54. 10.1063/1.11737110.1063/1.117371 ↗
55. 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.926310.1103/PhysRevB.55.9263 ↗
56. 10.1021/jz300309n10.1021/jz300309n ↗
57. 10.1088/0268-1242/11/2/00110.1088/0268-1242/11/2/001 ↗
58. 10.1063/1.492713310.1063/1.4927133 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2004.09.00510.1016/j.optlaseng.2004.09.005 ↗
60. 10.1007/s10409-018-0797-510.1007/s10409-018-0797-5 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.02.00510.1016/j.nanoen.2016.02.005 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.microrel.2021.11404510.1016/j.microrel.2021.114045 ↗
63. The κ wavenumber-stress factor was reported as κ(111) = 4.127, κ(100) = 4.596, and κ(110) = 4.298 in Ref. (52). The relative ratios of the three crystal planes of H-SiQDs (before the termination reaction) were obtained from the relative amounts of three Si-H groups as (111) = 62%, (001) = 25%, and other crystal planes (i.e., average of these three places) = 13%, as listed in Table 3. Thus, κ was calculated as 0.62 × 4.127 + 0.25 × 4.596 + 0.13 × ((4.127 + 4.596 + 4.298)/3) = 4.27. The unit of stress, σ, was GPa cm. Thus, the stress σ was calculated fromΔω divided by κ = 4.27 with a unit of GPa.
64. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.11520910.1103/PhysRevB.77.115209 ↗
65. 10.1063/1.10756510.1063/1.107565 ↗
66. 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.1102410.1103/PhysRevB.48.11024 ↗
67. 10.1016/0022-2313(93)90142-A10.1016/0022-2313(93)90142-A ↗
68. 10.1021/jp203064m10.1021/jp203064m ↗
69. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2021.11790410.1016/j.jlumin.2021.117904 ↗
70. 10.1134/S106377611907006910.1134/S1063776119070069 ↗
71. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.24543910.1103/PhysRevB.90.245439 ↗
72. 10.1021/acsami.7b0926510.1021/acsami.7b09265 ↗
73. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c1105210.1021/acs.jpcc.0c11052 ↗
74. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0667210.1021/acs.jpcc.0c06672 ↗
75. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b0227810.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02278 ↗
76. 10.1021/nl903212y10.1021/nl903212y ↗
77. 10.1063/1.359338210.1063/1.3593382 ↗
78. 10.1021/nl200169210.1021/nl2001692 ↗
79. 10.1021/nl104458310.1021/nl1044583 ↗
80. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.380310.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3803 ↗
81. 10.1021/nl303868910.1021/nl3038689 ↗
82. 10.1039/C5TC03064A10.1039/C5TC03064A ↗
83. 10.1039/C7NR09525B10.1039/C7NR09525B ↗
84. 10.1021/acsami.7b1698010.1021/acsami.7b16980 ↗
85. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b1281210.1021/acs.jpcc.7b12812 ↗