Development of Nickel-Based Negative Tone Metal Oxide Cluster Resists for Sub-10 nm Electron Beam and Helium Ion Beam Lithography
Source abstract
Abstract
Hybrid metal–organic cluster resist materials, also termed as organo-inorganics, demonstrate their potential for use in next-generation lithography owing to their ability for patterning down to ∼10 nm or below. High-resolution resist patterning is integrally associated with the compatibility of the resist and irradiation of the exposure source. Helium ion beam lithography (HIBL) is an emerging approach for the realization of sub-10 nm patterns at considerably lower line edge/width roughness (LER/LWR) and higher sensitivity as compared to electron beam lithography (EBL). Here, for the first time, a negative tone resist incorporating nickel (Ni)-based metal–organic clusters (Ni-MOCs) was synthesized and patterned using HIBL and EBL at 30 keV. This resist comprises a nickel-based metal building unit covalently linked with the organic ligand: m-toluic acid (C8H8O2). Dynamic light scattering confirmed a narrow size distribution of ∼2 nm for metal–organic cluster (MOC) formulations. High-resolution ∼9 nm HIBL line patterns were well developed at a sensitivity of 22 μC/cm2 and at a significantly low LER and LWR of 1.81 ± 0.06 and 2.90 ± 0.06 nm, respectively. Analogous high-resolution patterns were also observed in EBL with a sensitivity of 473 μC/cm2. Hence, the Ni-MOC-based resist investigated using HIBL and EBL elucidates the ability of its potential for the sub-10 nm technology node, under standard processing conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Photolithography Techniques · Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques · Ion-surface interactions and analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Computing and Electrical Engineering (SCEE), Indian Institute of Technology (IIT)-Mandi, Mandi 175005, Himachal Pradesh, India
School of Basic Sciences (SBS), Indian Institute of Technology (IIT)-Mandi, Mandi 175005, Himachal Pradesh, India
Funding
Ministry of Electronics and Information technology · Science and Engineering Research Board · Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0521810.1021/acs.nanolett.7b05218 ↗
2. 10.2494/photopolymer.29.15910.2494/photopolymer.29.159 ↗
3. 10.1117/1.JMM.17.4.04350310.1117/1.JMM.17.4.043503 ↗
4. Murr L. E. · 2016 · 607
5. 10.1007/s41871-018-0016-910.1007/s41871-018-0016-9 ↗
6. Kaestner M. · 2016 · 479
7. 10.2494/photopolymer.29.75310.2494/photopolymer.29.753 ↗
8. 10.1088/1361-6528/ab5d4210.1088/1361-6528/ab5d42 ↗
9. 10.1038/srep0923510.1038/srep09235 ↗
10. 10.1039/C6RA12077F10.1039/C6RA12077F ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0191110.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01911 ↗
12. 10.1021/am405905p10.1021/am405905p ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0348310.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03483 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0549110.1021/acsnano.9b05491 ↗
15. Gregor H. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B · 2014 · 32 · 020801
16. 10.1116/1.235796710.1116/1.2357967 ↗
17. Feixiang L. · SPIE · 2016 · 9779 · 977928
18. 10.1116/1.498101610.1116/1.4981016 ↗
19. 10.1116/1.318274210.1116/1.3182742 ↗
20. 10.1088/0957-0233/22/2/02400410.1088/0957-0233/22/2/024004 ↗
21. 10.1515/ntrev-2014-000410.1515/ntrev-2014-0004 ↗
22. 10.1116/1.475876810.1116/1.4758768 ↗
23. Shi, X.; Prewett, P.; Huq, E.; Bagnall, D. M.; Boden, S. Proximity Effect Quantification and Dose Optimisation for High Resolution Helium Ion Beam Lithography. 41st International Conference on Micro and Nano Engineering 2015.
24. Shi, X.; Prewett, P.; Huq, E.; Bagnall, D. M.; Boden, S., A Quantitative Comparison between Helium Ion and Electron Beam Lithography on PMMA Resist. 42nd International Conference on Micro and Nano Engineering (23/09/16): 2016.
25. 10.1002/smll.20150368010.1002/smll.201503680 ↗
26. 10.1002/smtd.20160006010.1002/smtd.201600060 ↗
27. 10.1038/srep2727610.1038/srep27276 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.7b1044910.1021/acsami.7b10449 ↗
29. 10.1116/1.323710110.1116/1.3237101 ↗
30. 10.1149/1.212906710.1149/1.2129067 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.498998110.1063/1.4989981 ↗
32. 10.1117/1.JMM.13.4.04300210.1117/1.JMM.13.4.043002 ↗
33. 10.1117/12.229716710.1117/12.2297167 ↗
34. 10.1117/12.251481410.1117/12.2514814 ↗
35. 10.1039/C6RA10575K10.1039/C6RA10575K ↗
36. Cardineau B. · 2016 · 377
37. 10.1117/12.87938510.1117/12.879385 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0157310.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01573 ↗
39. 10.2494/photopolymer.28.51510.2494/photopolymer.28.515 ↗
40. 10.1117/1.JMM.16.4.04100710.1117/1.JMM.16.4.041007 ↗
41. 10.1117/1.JMM.18.1.01100710.1117/1.JMM.18.1.011007 ↗
42. 10.1038/s41378-017-0001-210.1038/s41378-017-0001-2 ↗
43. 10.2494/photopolymer.27.66310.2494/photopolymer.27.663 ↗
44. 10.1039/C7QM00343A10.1039/C7QM00343A ↗
45. IEEE International Roadmap for Devices and Systems 2017 Edition; 2017.
46. 10.1117/12.204691710.1117/12.2046917 ↗
47. 10.1039/C5NR07334K10.1039/C5NR07334K ↗
48. 10.1016/j.mee.2018.02.01510.1016/j.mee.2018.02.015 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.mee.2016.02.04510.1016/j.mee.2016.02.045 ↗
50. 10.1149/1.208682510.1149/1.2086825 ↗
51. Cui Z. · 2009
52. 10.1039/C7CY02063E10.1039/C7CY02063E ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0144010.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01440 ↗
54. 10.1039/C6TA03519A10.1039/C6TA03519A ↗
55. 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b0156810.1021/acs.iecr.5b01568 ↗
56. 10.1021/am404765y10.1021/am404765y ↗
57. 10.1002/adma.20050048410.1002/adma.200500484 ↗
58. 10.1117/12.229756510.1117/12.2297565 ↗
59. 10.1117/12.204655510.1117/12.2046555 ↗
60. 10.1117/12.84667210.1117/12.846672 ↗
61. 10.1117/12.2086006.10.1117/12.2086006. ↗