journal article·2011-10-26

In Vitro Physicochemical Properties, Osteogenic Activity, and Immunocompatibility of Calcium Silicate–Gelatin Bone Grafts for Load-Bearing Applications

Shinn-Jyh Ding, Ming-You Shie, Chung-Kai Wei

Publisher page

Abstract

The use of a composite made of natural polymer gelatin and bioactive calcium silicate resembling the morphology and properties of natural bone may provide a solution to the problem of ceramic brittleness for load-bearing applications. The in vitro bioactivity, degradability, osteogenic activity, and immunocompatibility of three types of calcium silicate-gelatin composite bone grafts were characterized. The osteogenic activity and immunocompatibility were evaluated by incubating the bone grafts with human dental pulp cells. After soaking in a simulated body fluid (SBF) for 1 day, all materials were covered with clusters of "bone-like" apatite spherulites. The control material without gelatin exhibited an insignificant change in strength, degradability, and porosity and a small weight loss of 6% after 180 days of soaking in the SBF solution. In contrast, the soaking time imposed in this study did have a statistically significant effect on compressive strength, porosity, and weight loss of the gelatin-containing composites. After 180 days of soaking, the composite with 10 wt % gelatin lost 47% and 10% in compressive strength and weight, respectively, with a porosity of 23%. However, the presence of gelatin promoted greater cell attachment and proliferation on the composite bone grafts. Pulp cells on the calcium silicate-gelatin bone grafts expressed higher levels of osteocalcin, osteopontin, and bone sialoprotein. The inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase and interleukin-1 expression and the activation of interleukin-10 were increased with increasing gelatin content. Overall, these findings provide evidence that composite bone grafts containing 10 wt % gelatin with a high initial strength were bioactive, nontoxic, and osteogenic and may be able to promote bone healing for load-bearing applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Oral Biology and Biomaterials Science, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung City 402, Taiwan

Department of Dentistry, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung City 402, Taiwan

Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City 701, Taiwan

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Moore W. R. · ANZ J. Surg. · 2001 · 71 · 35410.1046/j.1440-1622.2001.02128.x ↗
2. Alves N. M. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2010 · 20 · 291110.1039/b910960a ↗
3. Shie M. Y. · Acta Biomater. · 2011 · 7 · 260410.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.023 ↗
4. Heinemann S. · Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2007 · 9 · 106110.1002/adem.200700219 ↗
5. Chen C. C. · J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. · 2010 · 21 · 105710.1007/s10856-009-3948-1 ↗
6. Ding S. J. · Tissue Eng. A · 2010 · 16 · 234310.1089/ten.tea.2009.0749 ↗
7. Ding S. J. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2011 · 21 · 1279310.1039/c1jm11171j ↗
8. Kim S. J. · J. Endod. · 2010 · 36 · 132610.1016/j.joen.2010.04.011 ↗
9. Chen C. C. · Int. Endod. J. · 2011 · 44 · 83610.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01890.x ↗
10. Ding S. J. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2009 · 19 · 118310.1039/b819033j ↗
11. Chen C. C. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B: Appl. Biomater. · 2010 · 95 · 45610.1002/jbm.b.31737 ↗
12. Durucan C. · Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2001 · 3 · 22710.1002/1527-2648(200104)3:4<227::AID-ADEM227>3.0.CO;2-1 ↗
13. Barralet J. E. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. · 2002 · 63 · 110.1002/jbm.1074 ↗
14. Chen C. C. · J. Endod. · 2009 · 35 · 155410.1016/j.joen.2009.08.006 ↗
15. Zhao W. · J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. · 2007 · 18 · 91710.1007/s10856-006-0069-y ↗
16. Gandolfi M. G. · Int. Endod. J. · 2010 · 43 · 91710.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01768.x ↗
17. Yang S. · Tissue Eng. · 2001 · 7 · 67910.1089/107632701753337645 ↗
18. Martin R. B. · Biomaterials · 1989 · 10 · 48110.1016/0142-9612(89)90090-2 ↗
19. Ding S. J. · Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2011 · 13 · B24610.1002/adem.201080132 ↗
20. Heini P. F. · Eur. Spine J. · 2001 · 10 · S20510.1007/s005860000204 ↗
21. Izquierdo-Barba I. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. · 2000 · 51 · 19110.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(200008)51:2<191::AID-JBM7>3.0.CO;2-T ↗
22. Wu C. C. · Surf. Coat. Technol. · 2011 · 205 · 318210.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.11.036 ↗
23. ter Brugge P. J. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. · 2002 · 61 · 39910.1002/jbm.10172 ↗
24. Malaval L. · J. Cell. Biochem. · 1999 · 74 · 61610.1002/(SICI)1097-4644(19990915)74:4<616::AID-JCB11>3.0.CO;2-Q ↗
25. Sabokbar A. · Bone Miner. · 1994 · 27 · 5710.1016/S0169-6009(08)80187-0 ↗
26. Zhao L. · Biomaterials · 2010 · 31 · 384810.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.093 ↗
27. Glanemann C. · J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. · 2003 · 61 · 6110.1007/s00253-002-1191-5 ↗
28. Mizuno M. · J. Biochem. · 2001 · 129 · 13310.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a002824 ↗
29. Hunter G. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 1993 · 90 · 856210.1073/pnas.90.18.8562 ↗
30. Chen J. · J. Bone Miner. Res. · 1992 · 7 · 98710.1002/jbmr.5650070816 ↗
31. Akira S. · FASEB J. · 1990 · 4 · 286010.1096/fasebj.4.11.2199284 ↗
32. van’t Hof R. J. · Immunology · 2001 · 103 · 25510.1046/j.1365-2567.2001.01261.x ↗
33. Ramp W. K. · Bone Miner. · 1994 · 24 · 5910.1016/S0169-6009(08)80131-6 ↗
34. Silver I. A. · Biomaterials · 2001 · 22 · 17510.1016/S0142-9612(00)00173-3 ↗
35. Ehara A. · Biomaterials · 2003 · 24 · 83110.1016/S0142-9612(02)00411-8 ↗
36. Leblebicioglu B. · J. Periodontol. · 1996 · 67 · 47210.1902/jop.1996.67.5.472 ↗
37. Lardner A. · J. Leukocyte Biol. · 2001 · 69 · 52210.1189/jlb.69.4.522 ↗
38. Kellum J. A. · Crit. Care · 2004 · 8 · 33110.1186/cc2900 ↗