journal article·2023-03-29

Effect of High-Anisotropic Co2+ Substitution for Ni2+ on the Structural, Magnetic, and Magnetostrictive Properties of NiFe2O4: Implications for Sensor Applications

Mudalagiriyappa Satish, Hadonahalli Munegowda Shashanka, Sujoy Saha, Keerthi Haritha, Debabrata Das, Pendaranahalli Nadikeraiah Anantharamaiah, C. V. Ramana

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 15· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

This work reports on the effect of substituting a low-anisotropic and low-magnetic cation (Ni 2+, 2μ B ) by a high-anisotropic and high-magnetic cation (Co 2+, 3μ B ) on the crystal structure, phase, microstructure, magnetic properties, and magnetostrictive properties of NiFe 2 O 4 (NFO). Co-substituted NFO (Ni 1– x Co x Fe 2 O 4, NCFO, 0 ≤ x ≤ 1) nanomaterials were synthesized using glycine-nitrate autocombustion followed by postsynthesis annealing at 1200 °C. The X-ray diffraction measurements coupled with Rietveld refinement analyses indicate the significant effect of Co-substitution for Ni, where the lattice constant ( a ) exhibits a functional dependence on composition ( x ). The a -value increases from 8.3268 to 8.3751 Å (±0.0002 Å) with increasing the “ x ” value from 0 to 1 in NCFO. The a – x functional dependence is derived from the ionic-size difference between Co 2+ and Ni 2+, which also induces grain agglomeration, as evidenced in electron microscopy imaging. The chemical bonding of NCFO, as probed by Raman spectroscopy, reveals that Co( x )-substitution induced a red shift of the T 2g (2) and A 1g (1) modes, and it is attributed to the changes in the metal–oxygen bond length in the octahedral and tetrahedral sites in NCFO. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy confirms the presence of Co 2+, Ni 2+, and Fe 3+ chemical states in addition to the cation distribution upon Co-substitution in NFO. Chemical homogeneity and uniform distribution of Co, Ni, Fe, and O are confirmed by EDS. The magnetic parameters, saturation magnetization ( M S ), remnant magnetization ( M r ), coercivity ( H C ), and anisotropy constant ( K 1 ) increased with increasing Co-content “ x ” in NCFO. The magnetostriction (λ) also follows a similar behavior and almost linearly varies from −33 ppm ( x = 0) to −227 ppm ( x = 1), which is primarily due to the high magnetocrystalline anisotropy contribution from Co 2+ ions at the octahedral sites. The magnetic and magnetostriction measurements and analyses indicate the potential of NCFO for torque sensor applications. Efforts to optimize materials for sensor applications indicate that, among all of the NCFO materials, Co-substitution with x = 0.5 demonstrates high strain sensitivity (−2.3 × 10 –9 m/A), which is nearly 2.5 times higher than that obtained for their intrinsic counterparts, namely, NiFe 2 O 4 ( x = 0) and CoFe 2 O 4 ( x = 1).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites · Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques · Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, M. S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bangalore 560058, India

Materials Research Centre, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India

Environmental Science and Engineering, University of Texas at El Paso, 500 West University Avenue, El Paso, Texas 79968, United States

Center for Advanced Materials Research, University of Texas at El Paso, 500 West University Avenue, El Paso, Texas 79968, United States

Department of Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at El Paso, 500 West University Avenue, El Paso, Texas 79968, United States

Funding

Science and Engineering Research Board · Division of Materials Research

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c0131310.1021/acs.nanolett.1c01313 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0370110.1021/acs.chemmater.0c03701 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0494310.1021/acsomega.2c04943 ↗
4. 10.1002/adem.20170074310.1002/adem.201700743 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41467-022-32862-410.1038/s41467-022-32862-4 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41563-020-0712-x10.1038/s41563-020-0712-x ↗
7. 10.1038/s41598-020-80460-510.1038/s41598-020-80460-5 ↗
8. 10.1002/adfm.20220738210.1002/adfm.202207382 ↗
9. 10.1039/D0RA06779B10.1039/D0RA06779B ↗
10. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.06.02510.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.06.025 ↗
11. Engdahl G. · 2000
12. 10.1063/1.479977510.1063/1.4799775 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.511481510.1063/1.5114815 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0816210.1021/acs.jpcc.7b08162 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.2c0645710.1021/acsami.2c06457 ↗
16. 10.1088/1361-6463/aa8af610.1088/1361-6463/aa8af6 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsomega.8b0222910.1021/acsomega.8b02229 ↗
18. 10.1021/jp106086410.1021/jp1060864 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.03.02110.1016/j.jmmm.2009.03.021 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.136560010.1063/1.1365600 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.03.05410.1016/j.jmmm.2007.03.054 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsanm.8b0200910.1021/acsanm.8b02009 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c0312510.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c03125 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.17240110.1103/PhysRevB.77.172401 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.physb.2010.05.04710.1016/j.physb.2010.05.047 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsami.8b2260010.1021/acsami.8b22600 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b1099810.1021/acs.jpcc.8b10998 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0738210.1021/acs.jpcc.0c07382 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsaelm.0c0071610.1021/acsaelm.0c00716 ↗
30. 10.1039/C8NH00278A10.1039/C8NH00278A ↗
31. 10.1038/srep3007410.1038/srep30074 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.02.16310.1016/j.jallcom.2011.02.163 ↗
33. 10.1109/LMAG.2021.312094210.1109/LMAG.2021.3120942 ↗
34. 10.1039/D0CP05448H10.1039/D0CP05448H ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16262710.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162627 ↗
36. 10.1007/s10948-020-05616-w10.1007/s10948-020-05616-w ↗
37. 10.3390/nano1012238410.3390/nano10122384 ↗
38. 10.1007/s00339-016-0217-210.1007/s00339-016-0217-2 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.apsadv.2021.10014510.1016/j.apsadv.2021.100145 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16028510.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160285 ↗
41. ASTM 10-325 (Ni-ferrite); National Bureau of Standards: USA, 1960; 539–1044.
42. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.16827610.1016/j.jmmm.2021.168276 ↗
43. 10.1021/am101209d10.1021/am101209d ↗
44. 10.1007/s00339010099410.1007/s003390100994 ↗
45. 10.1021/acsaem.2c0070810.1021/acsaem.2c00708 ↗
46. 10.1063/1.497775810.1063/1.4977758 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.05.03110.1016/j.jallcom.2015.05.031 ↗
48. 10.1007/s10853-018-2052-710.1007/s10853-018-2052-7 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2021.11017410.1016/j.jpcs.2021.110174 ↗
50. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b1224310.1021/acs.jpcc.5b12243 ↗
51. 10.3390/cryst1207093810.3390/cryst12070938 ↗
52. 10.1039/D1CE00118C10.1039/D1CE00118C ↗
53. 10.1039/C6CP00369A10.1039/C6CP00369A ↗
54. 10.1039/C4DT03203A10.1039/C4DT03203A ↗
55. 10.1016/j.elspec.2004.10.00310.1016/j.elspec.2004.10.003 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.elspec.2006.02.00410.1016/j.elspec.2006.02.004 ↗
57. 10.1063/1.369919310.1063/1.3699193 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.mseb.2022.11567410.1016/j.mseb.2022.115674 ↗
59. 10.1007/s10853-015-9211-x10.1007/s10853-015-9211-x ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jics.2022.10059910.1016/j.jics.2022.100599 ↗
61. 10.1039/D0RA05522K10.1039/D0RA05522K ↗