journal article·2020-07-08

Formation of Lattice-Dislocated Zinc Oxide via Anodic Corrosion for Electrocatalytic CO2Reduction to Syngas with a Potential-Dependent CO:H2Ratio

Binhao Qin, Qiao Zhang, Yu-Hang Li, Guangxing Yang, Feng Peng

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 12· Issue 27
Publisher page

Abstract

The electrochemical reduction of CO2 and H2O to syngas, a widely used precursor for chemical synthesis, has attracted increased attention. However, producing syngas over a wide range of CO:H2 ratios is important for its potential application. Herein, a facile method using an anodic oxidizing zinc plate has been developed to obtain lattice-dislocated ZnO, which exhibited higher faradaic efficiencies (above 90%) of syngas than that of ZnO without lattice dislocation. Moreover, the ratio of CO to H2 can be regulated in a wide range from 0.28 to 2.11 by applying different electrolyzing potentials, which is applicable to the synthesis of various chemicals. With density functional theory calculations, we conclude that the lattice dislocation defects in ZnO promote the electroreduction of CO2. In addition, stability and electrochemical noise tests show that lattice-dislocated ZnO can withstand long-term operation due to its effective corrosion resistance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China

School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China

School of Chemistry, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/smll.20170180910.1002/smll.201701809 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20150476610.1002/adma.201504766 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jcou.2017.07.01210.1016/j.jcou.2017.07.012 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jechem.2019.08.00210.1016/j.jechem.2019.08.002 ↗
5. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0317510.1021/acscatal.9b03175 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.04.05510.1016/j.apcatb.2015.04.055 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.00210.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.002 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0528710.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05287 ↗
9. 10.1021/acscatal.8b0258710.1021/acscatal.8b02587 ↗
10. 10.1002/anie.20191271910.1002/anie.201912719 ↗
11. 10.1021/jacs.7b0489210.1021/jacs.7b04892 ↗
12. 10.1039/C7EE00071E10.1039/C7EE00071E ↗
13. 10.1038/s41467-019-13388-810.1038/s41467-019-13388-8 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.9b2121610.1021/acsami.9b21216 ↗
15. 10.1002/anie.20160755210.1002/anie.201607552 ↗
16. 10.1039/C7GC00398F10.1039/C7GC00398F ↗
17. 10.1126/science.aaf183510.1126/science.aaf1835 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.09810.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.098 ↗
19. 10.1039/C8TA01010B10.1039/C8TA01010B ↗
20. 10.1039/C9TA02223F10.1039/C9TA02223F ↗
21. 10.1002/anie.20160288810.1002/anie.201602888 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ces.2018.03.02910.1016/j.ces.2018.03.029 ↗
23. 10.1002/anie.20171125510.1002/anie.201711255 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.03.02410.1016/j.nanoen.2019.03.024 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsami.8b1911110.1021/acsami.8b19111 ↗
26. 10.1002/anie.20190157510.1002/anie.201901575 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41467-019-12510-010.1038/s41467-019-12510-0 ↗
28. 10.1002/celc.20190166710.1002/celc.201901667 ↗
29. 10.1002/celc.20200018010.1002/celc.202000180 ↗
30. 10.1039/C8TA06649C10.1039/C8TA06649C ↗
31. 10.1002/anie.20180205510.1002/anie.201802055 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.05.04210.1016/j.carbon.2019.05.042 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.06.07710.1016/j.cej.2018.06.077 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsami.8b0480910.1021/acsami.8b04809 ↗
35. 10.1002/cssc.20180228710.1002/cssc.201802287 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41467-019-10819-410.1038/s41467-019-10819-4 ↗
37. 10.1039/C9TA11473D10.1039/C9TA11473D ↗
38. 10.1016/j.mattod.2019.05.02110.1016/j.mattod.2019.05.021 ↗
39. 10.1039/C9TA05904K10.1039/C9TA05904K ↗
40. 10.1098/rspa.1925.006110.1098/rspa.1925.0061 ↗
41. 10.1063/1.174327110.1063/1.1743271 ↗
42. 10.1038/218602a010.1038/218602a0 ↗
43. 10.1038/222869a010.1038/222869a0 ↗
44. 10.1126/science.aao369110.1126/science.aao3691 ↗
45. 10.1039/C9EE00018F10.1039/C9EE00018F ↗
46. 10.1021/am501423j10.1021/am501423j ↗
47. 10.1021/jp710071f10.1021/jp710071f ↗
48. Karperien, A.Fractal Dimension and Lacunarity (FracLac). https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/plugins/fraclac/fraclac.html.
49. 10.1038/nmeth.208910.1038/nmeth.2089 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
51. 10.1039/P2993000079910.1039/P29930000799 ↗
52. 10.1016/S1003-6326(08)60302-710.1016/S1003-6326(08)60302-7 ↗
53. Sarmiento E. · Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. · 2009 · 4 · 14410.1016/S1452-3981(23)15143-1 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.elecom.2010.03.04410.1016/j.elecom.2010.03.044 ↗
55. 10.1039/b515699h10.1039/b515699h ↗
56. 10.1002/slct.20180142010.1002/slct.201801420 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.10437410.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104374 ↗
58. 10.1155/2018/207927810.1155/2018/2079278 ↗
59. 10.1038/s41467-018-03712-z10.1038/s41467-018-03712-z ↗
60. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0140910.1021/acsenergylett.8b01409 ↗