Accurate Prediction of Voltage of Battery Electrode Materials Using Attention-Based Graph Neural Networks
Source abstract
Abstract
Performing first-principles calculations to discover electrodes’ properties in the large chemical space is a challenging task. While machine learning (ML) has been applied to effectively accelerate those discoveries, most of the applied methods ignore the materials’ spatial information and only use predefined features: based only on chemical compositions. We propose two attention-based graph convolutional neural network techniques to learn the average voltage of electrodes. Our proposed methods, which combine both atomic composition and atomic coordinates in 3D-space, improve the accuracy in voltage prediction significantly when compared to composition-based ML models. The first model directly learns the chemical reaction of electrodes and metal ions to predict their average voltage, whereas the second model combines electrodes’ ML predicted formation energy (Eform) to compute their average voltage. Our Eform-based model demonstrates improved accuracy in transferability from our subset of learned Li ions to Na ions. Moreover, we predicted the theoretical voltage of 10 NaxMPO4F (M = Ti, Cr, Fe, Cu, Mn, Co, and Ni) fluorophosphate battery frameworks, which are unavailable in the Material Project database. It could be shown that we can expect average voltages higher than 3.1 V from those Na battery frameworks except from the NaTiPO4F and TiPO4F pair of electrodes, which offer an average voltage of 1.32 V.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Fault Detection and Control Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29201, United States
Department of Physics, University of Colombo, PO Box 1490, Colombo 0300, Sri Lanka
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States
TQuT Inc., 10205 Edgerton Avenue NE, Rockford, Michigan 49341, United States
Funding
Laboratory Directed Research and Development · U.S. Department of Energy · National Science Foundation · Division of Materials Research
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20180056110.1002/adma.201800561 ↗
2. 10.3389/fenrg.2021.69590210.3389/fenrg.2021.695902 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.01.01310.1016/j.joule.2020.01.013 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.treng.2021.10005710.1016/j.treng.2021.100057 ↗
5. 10.1038/natrevmats.2015.410.1038/natrevmats.2015.4 ↗
6. 10.1149/2.0601805jes10.1149/2.0601805jes ↗
7. 10.1038/s41524-018-0110-y10.1038/s41524-018-0110-y ↗
8. 10.1063/5.001587210.1063/5.0015872 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.mtener.2020.10048210.1016/j.mtener.2020.100482 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.501766110.1063/1.5017661 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.02.02110.1016/j.commatsci.2016.02.021 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.509322010.1063/1.5093220 ↗
13. 10.1002/batt.20190013510.1002/batt.201900135 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsaem.0c0205310.1021/acsaem.0c02053 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.9b0493310.1021/acsami.9b04933 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.1c0462710.1021/acsami.1c04627 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0129410.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01294 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.14530110.1103/PhysRevLett.120.145301 ↗
19. 10.1126/sciadv.abf175410.1126/sciadv.abf1754 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.02810.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.23512110.1103/PhysRevB.70.235121 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.481232310.1063/1.4812323 ↗
23. 10.1109/TNNLS.2020.297838610.1109/TNNLS.2020.2978386 ↗
24. Louis S.-Y. · arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.08588 · 2021
25. Vaswani A. · arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.03762 · 2017
26. Veličković P. · arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.10903 · 2017
27. Louis S.-Y. · Phys. Chem. · 2020 · 22 · 18141
28. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.11053010.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110530 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matt.2021.02.01510.1016/j.matt.2021.02.015 ↗
30. Paszke A. · Neural Inf. Process. · 2017
31. Fey M. · arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.02428 · 2019
32. Girshick, R. Fast r-cnn. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2015; pp 1440–1448.10.1109/ICCV.2015.169 ↗
33. 10.1039/D1SC00482D10.1039/D1SC00482D ↗
34. 10.1021/acscentsci.7b0006410.1021/acscentsci.7b00064 ↗
35. 10.1186/s12859-018-2523-510.1186/s12859-018-2523-5 ↗
36. 10.1039/c1ee01782a10.1039/c1ee01782a ↗
37. 10.1002/aenm.20190396810.1002/aenm.201903968 ↗
38. 10.1039/C5CC01504A10.1039/C5CC01504A ↗
39. 10.1149/1.152369110.1149/1.1523691 ↗
40. Fang Y. · EER · 2018 · 1 · 294