journal article·2020-09-23

Pristine and Antibiotic-Loaded Nanosheets/Nanoneedles-Based Boron Nitride Films as a Promising Platform to Suppress Bacterial and Fungal Infections

Kristina Y. Gudz, Elizaveta S. Permyakova, Andrei T. Matveev, Andrey V. Bondarev, Anton M. Manakhov, Daria A. Sidorenko, Svetlana Y. Filippovich, Anatoli V. Brouchkov, Dmitri V. Golberg, Sergei G. Ignatov, Dmitry V. Shtansky

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 12· Issue 38
Publisher page

Abstract

In recent years, bacteria inactivation during their direct physical contact with surface nanotopography has become one of the promising strategies for fighting infection. Contact-killing ability has been reported for several nanostructured surfaces, e.g., black silicon, carbon nanotubes, zinc oxide nanorods, and copper oxide nanosheets. Herein, we demonstrate that Gram-negative antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteria are killed as a result of their physical destruction while contacting nanostructured h-BN surfaces. BN films, made of spherical nanoparticles formed by numerous nanosheets and nanoneedles with a thickness <15 nm, have been obtained through a reaction of ammonia with amorphous boron. The contact-killing bactericidal effect of BN nanostructures has been compared with a toxic effect of gentamicin released from them. For a wider protection against bacterial and fungal infection, the films have been saturated with a mixture of gentamicin and amphotericin B. Such BN films demonstrate a high antibiotic/antimycotic agent loading capacity and a fast initial and sustained release of therapeutic agents for 170–260 h depending on the loaded dose. The pristine BN films possess high antibacterial activity against E. coli K-261 strain at their initial concentration of 104 cells/mL, attaining >99% inactivation of colony forming units after 24 h, same as gentamicin-loaded (150 μg/cm2) BN sample. The BN films loaded with a mixture of gentamicin (150 and 300 μg/cm2) and amphotericin B (100 μg/cm2) effectively inhibit the growth of E. coli K-261 and Neurospora crassa strains. During immersion in the normal saline solution, the BN film generates reactive oxygen species (ROS), which can lead to accelerated oxidative stress at the site of physical cell damage. The obtained results are valuable for further development of nanostructured surfaces having contact killing, ROS, and biocide release abilities.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National University of Science and Technology “MISIS”, Leninsky prospect 4, Moscow 119049, Russia

Department of Control Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technicka 2, Prague 6 16627, Czech Republic

Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky prospect 33, bld. 2, Moscow 119071, Russia

Lomonosov Moscow State University, GSP1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow 119991 Russia

Centre for Materials Science and School of Chemistry and Physics, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Second George St., Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia

International Centre for Materials Nanoarchitectonics (MANA), National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS), Namiki 1-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3050044, Japan

State Research Center for Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Obolensk, Moscow Region 142279, Russia

Funding

Russian Science Foundation · European Regional Development Fund · Australian Research Council

References (72)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/c3ra23325a10.1039/c3ra23325a ↗
2. 10.1111/1751-7915.1278510.1111/1751-7915.12785 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.02.12110.1016/j.matlet.2019.02.121 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.03.07610.1016/j.ceramint.2019.03.076 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.03.11010.1016/j.apsusc.2018.03.110 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.10.01310.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.10.013 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.12.03810.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.12.038 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.03910.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.039 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2016.07.01410.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2016.07.014 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.04.02810.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.04.028 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.04.06810.1016/j.msec.2018.04.068 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.12.11910.1016/j.apsusc.2014.12.119 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.00210.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.002 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.01.12110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.01.121 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.10.03610.1016/j.actbio.2018.10.036 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.8b0667110.1021/acsami.8b06671 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.07.16910.1016/j.apsusc.2013.07.169 ↗
18. Parmar M. · Int. J. Plant, Animal Env. Sci. · 2013 · 3 · 143
19. Mosby C. V. · 1996
20. 10.1021/acsami.6b1509610.1021/acsami.6b15096 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.01110.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.011 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.01.04610.1016/j.msec.2016.01.046 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.05110.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.051 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.12.05210.1016/j.msec.2018.12.052 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.addr.2016.04.00410.1016/j.addr.2016.04.004 ↗
26. 10.1039/C8NR05027A10.1039/C8NR05027A ↗
27. 10.1039/C8BM00516H10.1039/C8BM00516H ↗
28. 10.1021/nn200139h10.1021/nn200139h ↗
29. 10.1007/s12274-017-1635-y10.1007/s12274-017-1635-y ↗
30. 10.2217/nnm.14.2510.2217/nnm.14.25 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.02.01210.1016/j.chempr.2018.02.012 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10874210.1016/j.matdes.2020.108742 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.nano.2017.05.00610.1016/j.nano.2017.05.006 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.12.27310.1016/j.apsusc.2018.12.273 ↗
35. 10.2147/IJN.S11068910.2147/IJN.S110689 ↗
36. 10.1002/anie.20160123810.1002/anie.201601238 ↗
37. 10.1039/C4RA04846F10.1039/C4RA04846F ↗
38. 10.1088/1361-6528/aa700e10.1088/1361-6528/aa700e ↗
39. 10.3390/ma1009106610.3390/ma10091066 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0166510.1021/acsnano.8b01665 ↗
41. 10.1186/s12951-017-0291-410.1186/s12951-017-0291-4 ↗
42. 10.1557/jmr.2013.31610.1557/jmr.2013.316 ↗
43. 10.1038/ncomms383810.1038/ncomms3838 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41586-018-0278-910.1038/s41586-018-0278-9 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.02.01210.1016/j.chembiol.2014.02.012 ↗
46. 10.1038/s41540-018-0069-910.1038/s41540-018-0069-9 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.12.00310.1016/j.ymeth.2017.12.003 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.coisb.2017.11.00110.1016/j.coisb.2017.11.001 ↗
49. 10.1007/s12274-015-0717-y10.1007/s12274-015-0717-y ↗
50. 10.1039/C5TA05831G10.1039/C5TA05831G ↗
51. Fitzgerald, K. T.; Newquist, K. L. Small Animal Toxicology, 3rd ed. 2013; Chapter 20, pp 229–249.10.1016/B978-1-4557-0717-1.00020-X ↗
52. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01751.x10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01751.x ↗
53. Rex J. H. · 2015 · 492
54. 10.1016/j.tsf.2004.05.10710.1016/j.tsf.2004.05.107 ↗
55. 10.1021/ja00883a00110.1021/ja00883a001 ↗
56. 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00159-210.1016/S1359-6454(00)00159-2 ↗
57. 10.1098/rsif.2014.016910.1098/rsif.2014.0169 ↗
58. 10.1021/acsami.9b0964910.1021/acsami.9b09649 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.10.01710.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.10.017 ↗
60. 10.1039/C9RA06773F10.1039/C9RA06773F ↗
61. Ignatov S. G. · Biokhimiya · 1982 · 47 · 1621
62. 10.3389/fphys.2016.0042310.3389/fphys.2016.00423 ↗
63. 10.1021/acsanm.9b0248610.1021/acsanm.9b02486 ↗
64. 10.1021/jp110985w10.1021/jp110985w ↗
65. 10.1002/smll.20130394710.1002/smll.201303947 ↗
66. 10.4103/0973-7847.7090210.4103/0973-7847.70902 ↗
67. 10.1088/1748-605X/aa770c10.1088/1748-605X/aa770c ↗
68. 10.1016/S1672-6529(14)60148-710.1016/S1672-6529(14)60148-7 ↗
69. 10.1038/s41598-019-50496-310.1038/s41598-019-50496-3 ↗
70. 10.1088/1757-899X/116/1/01200910.1088/1757-899X/116/1/012009 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.12.04510.1016/j.msec.2018.12.045 ↗
72. 10.1021/acsabm.9b0115410.1021/acsabm.9b01154 ↗