Degradation Mechanism of All-Solid-State Li-Metal Batteries Studied by Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy
Source abstract
Abstract
Solid-state Li-metal batteries have the potential to achieve both high safety and high energy densities. Among various solid-state fast-ion conductors, the garnet-type Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZO) is one of the few that are stable to Li metal. However, the large interfacial resistance between LLZO and cathode materials severely limits the practical application of LLZO. Here a LiCoO2 (LCO) film was deposited onto an Al-doped LLZO substrate at room temperature by aerosol deposition, and a low interfacial resistance was achieved. The LCO particles were precoated by Li3BO3 (LBO), which melted to join the LCO particles to the LLZO substrate at heating. All-solid-state Li/LLZO/LBO-LCO cells could deliver an initial discharge capacity of 128 mAh g–1 at 0.2 C and 60 °C and demonstrated relatively high capacity retention of 87% after 30 cycles. The cell degradation mechanism was studied by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and was found to be mainly related to the increase of the interfacial resistance between LBO and LCO. In-situ SEM analysis verified the hypothesis that the increase of the interfacial resistance was caused primarily by interfacial cracking upon cycling. This study demonstrated the capability of EIS as a powerful nondestructive in-situ technique to investigate the failure mechanisms of all-solid-state batteries.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto 615-8510, Japan
Graduate School of Urban Environmental Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan
Funding
Advanced Low Carbon Technology Research and Development Program
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Global EV Outlook 2021, IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2021.
2. Tracking Transport 2020, IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/tracking-transport-2020.
3. 10.1038/nmat306610.1038/nmat3066 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.est.2020.10215710.1016/j.est.2020.102157 ↗
5. 10.1002/anie.20070114410.1002/anie.200701144 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0385410.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03854 ↗
7. 10.1002/aenm.20200131810.1002/aenm.202001318 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0300210.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03002 ↗
9. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac065410.1149/1945-7111/ac0654 ↗
10. 10.1038/nmat482110.1038/nmat4821 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.6b0083110.1021/acsami.6b00831 ↗
12. 10.1002/adfm.20190618910.1002/adfm.201906189 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13042310.1016/j.cej.2021.130423 ↗
14. 10.1039/D0EE02062A10.1039/D0EE02062A ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jascer.2017.03.00110.1016/j.jascer.2017.03.001 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.07.02610.1016/j.ensm.2019.07.026 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.isci.2022.10389610.1016/j.isci.2022.103896 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.9b2125110.1021/acsami.9b21251 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.23070510.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230705 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.02.00710.1016/j.joule.2018.02.007 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.03810.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.038 ↗
22. 10.1002/ente.20200105910.1002/ente.202001059 ↗
23. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01030.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01030.x ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.10.10110.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.10.101 ↗
25. 10.3389/fenrg.2016.0003210.3389/fenrg.2016.00032 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.02.07310.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.02.073 ↗
27. 10.3390/batteries402002610.3390/batteries4020026 ↗
28. 10.1002/celc.20210010810.1002/celc.202100108 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0196510.1021/acsaem.9b01965 ↗
30. Huggins R. · 2008
31. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0489910.1021/acs.chemmater.9b04899 ↗
32. 10.33961/jecst.2019.0052810.33961/jecst.2019.00528 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.03.02910.1016/j.egyr.2020.03.029 ↗
34. 10.1002/ente.20160015410.1002/ente.201600154 ↗