journal article·2024-01-10Open access

Cold Temperature Direct Air CO2 Capture with Amine-Loaded Metal–Organic Framework Monoliths

Yuxiang Wang, Guanhe Rim, MinGyu Song, Hannah E. Holmes, Christopher W. Jones, Ryan P. Lively

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Zeolites, silica-supported amines, and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have been demonstrated as promising adsorbents for direct air CO 2 capture (DAC), but the shaping and structuring of these materials into sorbent modules for practical processes have been inadequately investigated compared to the extensive research on powder materials. Furthermore, there have been relatively few studies reporting the DAC performance of sorbent contactors under cold, subambient conditions (temperatures below 20 °C). In this work, we demonstrate the successful fabrication of adsorbent monoliths composed of cellulose acetate (CA) and adsorbent particles such as zeolite 13X and MOF MIL-101(Cr) by a 3D printing technique: solution-based additive manufacturing (SBAM). These monoliths feature interpenetrated macroporous polymeric frameworks in which microcrystals of zeolite 13X or MIL-101(Cr) are evenly distributed, highlighting the versatility of SBAM in fabricating monoliths containing sorbents with different particle sizes and density. Branched poly(ethylenimine) (PEI) is successfully loaded into the CA/MIL-101(Cr) monoliths to impart CO 2 uptakes of 1.05 mmol g monolith –1 at −20 °C and 400 ppm of CO 2 . Kinetic analysis shows that the CO 2 sorption kinetics of PEI-loaded MIL-101(Cr) sorbents are not compromised in the monoliths compared to the powder sorbents. Importantly, these monoliths exhibit promising working capacities (0.95 mmol g monolith –1 ) over 14 temperature swing cycles with a moderate regeneration temperature of 60 °C. Dynamic breakthrough experiments at 25 °C under dry conditions reveal a CO 2 uptake capacity of 0.60 mmol g monolith –1, which further increases to 1.05 and 1.43 mmol g monolith –1 at −20 °C under dry and humid (70% relative humidity) conditions, respectively. Our work showcases the successful implementation of SBAM in making DAC sorbent monoliths with notable CO 2 capture performance over a wide range of sorption temperatures, suggesting that SBAM can enable the preparation of efficient sorbent contactors in various form factors for other important chemical separations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 311 Ferst Dr., Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States

Funding

National Energy Technology Laboratory · Division of Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems · Zero Carbon Partners, LLC · Georgia Tech Institute for Electronics and Nanotechnology

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11814-021-0976-010.1007/s11814-021-0976-0 ↗
2. 10.1002/anie.20230288710.1002/anie.202302887 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsami.3c0814010.1021/acsami.3c08140 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c0204110.1021/acs.iecr.2c02041 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0017310.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00173 ↗
6. 10.1039/D1TA05961K10.1039/D1TA05961K ↗
7. 10.1002/adfm.20201004710.1002/adfm.202010047 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.2c1114310.1021/acsami.2c11143 ↗
9. 10.1039/D1CS00970B10.1039/D1CS00970B ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13156110.1016/j.cej.2021.131561 ↗
11. 10.1021/jacs.2c0538210.1021/jacs.2c05382 ↗
12. 10.1021/jacsau.1c0041410.1021/jacsau.1c00414 ↗
13. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0169210.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01692 ↗
14. 10.1021/jacs.2c1270710.1021/jacs.2c12707 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.1c0608910.1021/acsami.1c06089 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.1c0366110.1021/acsami.1c03661 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b0497310.1021/acs.iecr.8b04973 ↗
18. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0620310.1021/acssuschemeng.8b06203 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13385610.1016/j.cej.2021.133856 ↗
20. 10.1002/cssc.20160040410.1002/cssc.201600404 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c0006010.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00060 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.11833910.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.118339 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c0174110.1021/acs.iecr.1c01741 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.12166010.1016/j.seppur.2022.121660 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13819710.1016/j.cej.2022.138197 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsami.6b0964710.1021/acsami.6b09647 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.17810.1016/j.cej.2018.04.178 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.7b1162610.1021/acsami.7b11626 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.8b0519210.1021/acsami.8b05192 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b0450810.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b04508 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12616610.1016/j.cej.2020.126166 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12633310.1016/j.cej.2020.126333 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ces.2020.11556410.1016/j.ces.2020.115564 ↗
34. 10.1021/acscatal.2c0445510.1021/acscatal.2c04455 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c0296910.1021/acs.iecr.2c02969 ↗
36. 10.1002/amp2.1002610.1002/amp2.10026 ↗
37. 10.1002/marc.20180027410.1002/marc.201800274 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.matt.2022.07.01210.1016/j.matt.2022.07.012 ↗
39. 10.1557/s43579-022-00209-110.1557/s43579-022-00209-1 ↗
40. 10.1039/C5DT02625C10.1039/C5DT02625C ↗
41. 10.1039/C8TA11300A10.1039/C8TA11300A ↗
42. 10.1007/s10450-011-9320-z10.1007/s10450-011-9320-z ↗
43. 10.1021/ef070038y10.1021/ef070038y ↗
44. 10.1021/ja304390510.1021/ja3043905 ↗
45. 10.1039/D3SE00618B10.1039/D3SE00618B ↗
46. 10.1021/la202033p10.1021/la202033p ↗
47. 10.1021/jz502032c10.1021/jz502032c ↗
48. 10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.11.01010.1016/j.cogsc.2018.11.010 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.gca.2006.08.03410.1016/j.gca.2006.08.034 ↗
50. 10.1021/jacs.8b0452010.1021/jacs.8b04520 ↗
51. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c0414510.1021/acs.jpcc.1c04145 ↗