journal article·2021-08-18

Optimizing Fog Harps

Nicholas G. Kowalski, Weiwei Shi, Brook S. Kennedy, Jonathan B. Boreyko

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 13· Issue 32
Publisher page

Abstract

It has recently been demonstrated that harps harvest substantively more fog water than conventional mesh nets, but the optimal design for fog harps remains unknown. Here, we systematically vary key parameters of a scale-model fog harp, the wire material, wire pitch, and wire length, to find the optimal combination. We found stainless steel to not only be the best hydrophilic wire material but also nearly be as effective as Teflon-coated wires. The best choice for the wire pitch was coupled to the wire length, as the smallest pitch collected the most water for short harps but was hampered by tangling for taller harps. Accordingly, we use an elastocapillary wire tangling model to successfully predict the onset of tangling beyond a critical length for any given wire pitch. Combining what we learned, we achieved a water harvesting efficiency of 17% with an optimized stainless-steel harp, over three times higher than that of the current standard of a Raschel mesh. These results suggest that an optimal fog harp should feature high-tension, uncoated wires within a large aspect ratio frame to avoid tangling and promote efficient and reliable fog harvesting.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Solar-Powered Water Purification Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States

Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States

School of Architecture and Design, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States

Funding

GreenShift Corporation · LAUNCH: The Center for New Ventures

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.envint.2013.11.01910.1016/j.envint.2013.11.019 ↗
2. 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0941:eaeows]2.0.co;210.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0941:eaeows]2.0.co;2 ↗
3. 10.1175/2011jhm1328.110.1175/2011jhm1328.1 ↗
4. 10.1038/nature0944010.1038/nature09440 ↗
5. Magill G. · 2019
6. 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.05.00610.1016/j.foodpol.2010.05.006 ↗
7. 10.1007/s13280-012-0247-810.1007/s13280-012-0247-8 ↗
8. 10.3390/w1004037210.3390/w10040372 ↗
9. 10.1016/0169-8095(89)90036-710.1016/0169-8095(89)90036-7 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.08.00510.1016/j.atmosres.2011.08.005 ↗
11. 10.1021/la402409f10.1021/la402409f ↗
12. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.03.00610.1016/j.atmosres.2016.03.006 ↗
13. 10.1038/srep2427610.1038/srep24276 ↗
14. 10.1021/la403021q10.1021/la403021q ↗
15. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.05.07110.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.05.071 ↗
16. 10.1021/la301398710.1021/la3013987 ↗
17. 10.1021/la504148610.1021/la5041486 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.08.03410.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.08.034 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.5b0894110.1021/acsami.5b08941 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41598-017-09108-110.1038/s41598-017-09108-1 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.6b1680310.1021/acsami.6b16803 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.11.00310.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.11.003 ↗
23. 10.1021/la304389s10.1021/la304389s ↗
24. 10.1002/adma.20130306510.1002/adma.201303065 ↗
25. 10.1039/c2sm27032c10.1039/c2sm27032c ↗
26. 10.1098/rsta.2019.044410.1098/rsta.2019.0444 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.9b1186210.1021/acsami.9b11862 ↗
28. 10.1186/1742-9994-7-2310.1186/1742-9994-7-23 ↗
29. 10.1038/3510210810.1038/35102108 ↗
30. 10.1021/la502886610.1021/la5028866 ↗
31. 10.1038/ncomms225310.1038/ncomms2253 ↗
32. 10.1088/1748-3190/10/3/03600510.1088/1748-3190/10/3/036005 ↗
33. 10.1088/1748-3182/9/3/03100210.1088/1748-3182/9/3/031002 ↗
34. 10.1038/nature0872910.1038/nature08729 ↗
35. 10.1038/ncomms225310.1038/ncomms2253 ↗
36. 10.1002/adfm.20130366110.1002/adfm.201303661 ↗
37. 10.1007/s00442005068310.1007/s004420050683 ↗
38. 10.2307/193032010.2307/1930320 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsami.7b1748810.1021/acsami.7b17488 ↗
40. 10.1002/adsu.20200004010.1002/adsu.202000040 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsami.0c1232910.1021/acsami.0c12329 ↗
42. 10.1039/c9sm01105f10.1039/c9sm01105f ↗
43. 10.1126/sciadv.aao532310.1126/sciadv.aao5323 ↗
44. 10.1007/s42452-021-04518-310.1007/s42452-021-04518-3 ↗
45. 10.4209/aaqr.2017.01.004010.4209/aaqr.2017.01.0040 ↗
46. Blodgett K. · 2004
47. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12818010.1016/j.cej.2020.128180 ↗
48. 10.1039/d0ta01204a10.1039/d0ta01204a ↗
49. 10.1088/1748-3190/10/1/01600410.1088/1748-3190/10/1/016004 ↗
50. Schemenauer, R.; Cereceda, P.; Osses, P. FogQuest: Fog Water Collection Manual, 2015.