Ultrafast Degradation and High Adsorption Capability of a Sulfur Mustard Simulant under Ambient Conditions Using Granular UiO-66-NH2 Metal–Organic Gels
Source abstract
Abstract
Zirconium-based metal–organic frameworks (Zr-MOFs) have been considered as prospective materials for the degradation of nerve chemical warfare agents (CWAs) but show poor catalytic performance toward blister agents. Moreover, the powder issues and the poor adsorption capability also remain as the major challenges for the application of Zr-MOFs in practical CWA detoxification. Herein, a series of defected granular UiO-66-NH2 metal–organic gels are synthesized via adjusting the amount of added concentrated hydrochloric acid for the decontamination of 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide (2-CEES), a sulfur mustard simulant. The half-life of 2-CEES decontaminated by defected granular UiO-66-NH2 metal–organic gels can be shortened to 7.6 min, which is the highest reported value for MOFs under ambient conditions. The mechanism of decontamination is that the amino group on the linkers in UiO-66-NH2 MOGs undergoes a substitution reaction with 2-CEES to yield 2-(2-(ethylthio)ethylamino)terephthalic acid, which is less toxic and fixed in the frameworks. The recycling test corroborates that the granular UiO-66-NH2 xerogels possess good stability and reusability. Static adsorption and desorption tests show that UiO-66-NH2 xerogels possess a high 2-CEES vapor adsorption capacity of 802 mg/g after exposure for 1 d and only 28 wt % desorption capacity after air exposure for 7 d. The dual function of ultrafast degradation and high adsorption capability provide a firm foundation for using UiO-66-NH2 xerogels as a future protection media.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Energetic Materials and Combustion · Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of NBC Protection for Civilian, Beijing 102205, PR China
College of Liberal Arts and Science, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Huxiang Young Talent Project
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.11.04010.1016/j.toxlet.2017.11.040 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.tox.2017.11.01110.1016/j.tox.2017.11.011 ↗
3. 10.1007/s00204-018-2294-910.1007/s00204-018-2294-9 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2018.12.00610.1016/j.toxlet.2018.12.006 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2021.02.00710.1016/j.toxlet.2021.02.007 ↗
6. 10.1039/c7cs00108h10.1039/c7cs00108h ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0082810.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00828 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.9b2015410.1021/acsami.9b20154 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsami.7b0634110.1021/acsami.7b06341 ↗
10. 10.1002/anie.20150209410.1002/anie.201502094 ↗
11. 10.1039/c6ra23826b10.1039/c6ra23826b ↗
12. 10.1002/adfm.20200551710.1002/adfm.202005517 ↗
13. 10.1039/c9en01321k10.1039/c9en01321k ↗
14. 10.1002/anie.20150840710.1002/anie.201508407 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b0236010.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b02360 ↗
16. Jia M. · Chem. Ind. Eng. Prog. · 2018 · 37 · 3471
17. 10.1039/c4sc03613a10.1039/c4sc03613a ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b0180910.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b01809 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.07.02710.1016/j.micromeso.2018.07.027 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.1c1275110.1021/acsami.1c12751 ↗
21. 10.1002/smll.20210438710.1002/smll.202104387 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12360510.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123605 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12476510.1016/j.cej.2020.124765 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.21354410.1016/j.ccr.2020.213544 ↗
25. 10.1038/ncomms275710.1038/ncomms2757 ↗
26. 10.1039/c9sc04961d10.1039/c9sc04961d ↗
27. 10.1038/nmat505010.1038/nmat5050 ↗
28. 10.1039/c8cc07252c10.1039/c8cc07252c ↗
29. 10.1038/s41467-019-10185-110.1038/s41467-019-10185-1 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.12505710.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125057 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsami.1c0152410.1021/acsami.1c01524 ↗
32. 10.1039/c6sc05602d10.1039/c6sc05602d ↗
33. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.04.00810.1016/j.micromeso.2019.04.008 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsami.0c1081810.1021/acsami.0c10818 ↗
35. 10.1039/d1ra01703a10.1039/d1ra01703a ↗
36. 10.1039/c3cc46105j10.1039/c3cc46105j ↗
37. 10.1021/acsami.1c0836510.1021/acsami.1c08365 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0060210.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00602 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.11.09910.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.11.099 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.11381210.1016/j.molliq.2020.113812 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12233210.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122332 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsami.9b1731410.1021/acsami.9b17314 ↗
43. 10.1002/chem.20200366510.1002/chem.202003665 ↗
44. 10.1039/c6sc00987e10.1039/c6sc00987e ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0007010.1021/acs.jpcc.7b00070 ↗
46. 10.1002/anie.20130752010.1002/anie.201307520 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.01.03310.1016/j.apcatb.2019.01.033 ↗
48. 10.1039/c5cc03398e10.1039/c5cc03398e ↗
49. 10.3390/catal1009108610.3390/catal10091086 ↗
50. 10.1021/jp984689u10.1021/jp984689u ↗
51. 10.1021/jp000101j10.1021/jp000101j ↗
52. 10.1021/ja003518b10.1021/ja003518b ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.12910.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.129 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.03.00410.1016/j.micromeso.2007.03.004 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.11.07310.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.11.073 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jece.2016.06.00810.1016/j.jece.2016.06.008 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.03.03410.1016/j.carbon.2009.03.034 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.02.00710.1016/j.micromeso.2008.02.007 ↗
59. 10.1039/c2dt31888a10.1039/c2dt31888a ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.06.04310.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.06.043 ↗
61. 10.1021/acsami.0c1702210.1021/acsami.0c17022 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.07.05310.1016/j.jcis.2018.07.053 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.12.06810.1016/j.apcatb.2017.12.068 ↗
64. 10.1039/c5ta09234e10.1039/c5ta09234e ↗
65. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.06410.1016/j.cej.2019.01.064 ↗
66. 10.1021/acsami.7b0627410.1021/acsami.7b06274 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.11740610.1016/j.seppur.2020.117406 ↗