journal article·2021-06-30

Tunable Pore Size from Sub-Nanometer to a Few Nanometers in Large-Area Graphene Nanoporous Atomically Thin Membranes

Xiaobo Chen, Shengping Zhang, Dandan Hou, Hongwei Duan, Bing Deng, Zhiyang Zeng, Bingyao Liu, Luzhao Sun, Ruiyang Song, Jinlong Du, Peng Gao, Hailin Peng, Zhongfan Liu, Luda Wang

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 13· Issue 25
Publisher page

Abstract

Membranes are key components in chemical purification, biological separation, and water desalination. Traditional polymeric membranes are subjected to a ubiquitous trade-off between permeance and selectivity, which significantly hinders the separation performance. Nanoporous atomically thin membranes (NATMs), such as graphene NATMs, have the potential to break this trade-off. Owing to their uniqueness of two-dimensional structure and potential nanopore structure controllability, NATMs are expected to have outstanding selectivity through molecular sieving while achieving ultimate permeance at the same time. However, a drastic selectivity discrepancy exists between the proof-of-concept demonstrations and scalable separation applications in graphene membranes. In this paper, we offer a possible solution to narrow this discrepancy by tuning the pore density and pore size separately with two successive plasma treatments. We demonstrate that by narrowing the pore size distribution, the selectivity of graphene membranes can be greatly increased. Low-energy argon plasma is first applied to nucleate high density of defects in graphene. Controlled oxygen plasma is then utilized to selectively enlarge the defects into nanopores with desired sizes. This method is scalable, and the fabricated 1 cm2 graphene NATMs with sub-nanometer pores can separate KCl and Allura Red with a selectivity of 104 and a permeance of 1.1 × 10–6 m s–1. The pores in NATMs can be further tuned from gas-selective sub-nanometer pores to a few nanometer size. The fabricated NATMs show a selectivity of 35 between CO2 and N2. With longer enlargement time, a selectivity of 21.2 between a lysozyme and bovine serum albumin can also be achieved with roughly four times higher permeance than that of a commercial dialysis membrane. This research offers a solution to realize NATMs of tunable pore size with a narrow pore size distribution for different separation processes from sub-nanometer in gas separation or desalination to a few nanometers in dialysis.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Advancements in Battery Materials · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Microelectronics, School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Beijing Graphene Institute, Beijing 100095, China

Center for Nanochemistry, Beijing Science and Engineering Center for Nanocarbons, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Center for Nanochemistry, Beijing Science and Engineering Center for Nanocarbons, Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Electron Microscopy Laboratory, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

International Center for Quantum Materials, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter, Beijing 100871, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission · Boya postdoctoral fellowship · Peking University ???Health Science-Information Science??? Cross-Research Seed Foundation

References (71)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nnano.2009.13310.1038/nnano.2009.133 ↗
2. 10.1038/nnano.2017.7210.1038/nnano.2017.72 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41467-018-07888-210.1038/s41467-018-07888-2 ↗
4. Baker R. W. · 201210.1002/9781118359686 ↗
5. 10.1016/0376-7388(95)00102-I10.1016/0376-7388(95)00102-I ↗
6. 10.1126/science.114674410.1126/science.1146744 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.aab053010.1126/science.aab0530 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.120377110.1126/science.1203771 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.03010.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.030 ↗
10. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.1810.1038/natrevmats.2016.18 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20150259510.1002/adma.201502595 ↗
12. 10.1039/C4CS00423J10.1039/C4CS00423J ↗
13. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0587010.1021/acsnano.5b05870 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.05.05210.1016/j.carbon.2013.05.052 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20180099610.1002/adma.201800996 ↗
16. 10.1038/nnano.2012.16210.1038/nnano.2012.162 ↗
17. 10.1038/nnano.2015.15810.1038/nnano.2015.158 ↗
18. 10.1038/nnano.2015.22210.1038/nnano.2015.222 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0252310.1021/acsnano.7b02523 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41467-018-04904-310.1038/s41467-018-04904-3 ↗
21. 10.1021/jp406194510.1021/jp4061945 ↗
22. 10.1021/jp212181h10.1021/jp212181h ↗
23. 10.1002/adma.20180497710.1002/adma.201804977 ↗
24. 10.1002/chem.20190513310.1002/chem.201905133 ↗
25. 10.1039/C7NR02247F10.1039/C7NR02247F ↗
26. 10.1038/nnano.2015.3710.1038/nnano.2015.37 ↗
27. 10.1126/science.aau532110.1126/science.aau5321 ↗
28. 10.1126/sciadv.aau047610.1126/sciadv.aau0476 ↗
29. 10.1021/nl404118f10.1021/nl404118f ↗
30. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0429910.1021/acsnano.7b04299 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsami.0c0727710.1021/acsami.0c07277 ↗
32. 10.1126/sciadv.aav185110.1126/sciadv.aav1851 ↗
33. 10.1021/jz400666h10.1021/jz400666h ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.18740110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.187401 ↗
35. 10.1038/nnano.2013.4610.1038/nnano.2013.46 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.03542610.1103/PhysRevB.88.035426 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.scib.2017.07.00510.1016/j.scib.2017.07.005 ↗
38. 10.1021/nn303352k10.1021/nn303352k ↗
39. 10.1002/smll.20090117310.1002/smll.200901173 ↗
40. 10.3938/jkps.55.129910.3938/jkps.55.1299 ↗
41. 10.1039/C6CS00915H10.1039/C6CS00915H ↗
42. 10.1039/C4TA01975J10.1039/C4TA01975J ↗
43. 10.1038/nphys318310.1038/nphys3183 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.09680410.1103/PhysRevLett.104.096804 ↗
45. 10.1038/s41563-020-0738-010.1038/s41563-020-0738-0 ↗
46. 10.1021/nn901275310.1021/nn9012753 ↗
47. 10.1088/0953-8984/27/8/08300210.1088/0953-8984/27/8/083002 ↗
48. 10.1021/nl300901a10.1021/nl300901a ↗
49. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.03.04910.1016/j.carbon.2015.03.049 ↗
50. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0045610.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00456 ↗
51. 10.1021/nl201432g10.1021/nl201432g ↗
52. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.12.05710.1016/j.carbon.2009.12.057 ↗
53. 10.1021/nn303869m10.1021/nn303869m ↗
54. 10.1002/adma.20170483910.1002/adma.201704839 ↗
55. 10.1063/1.490512810.1063/1.4905128 ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.13410910.1103/PhysRevB.98.134109 ↗
57. 10.1116/1.494485410.1116/1.4944854 ↗
58. 10.1021/nn305073e10.1021/nn305073e ↗
59. 10.1039/C7TA09777H10.1039/C7TA09777H ↗
60. 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.08.03310.1016/j.memsci.2018.08.033 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.11939110.1016/j.memsci.2021.119391 ↗
62. 10.1002/app.4674010.1002/app.46740 ↗
63. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0126110.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01261 ↗
64. 10.1088/0957-4484/21/36/36570110.1088/0957-4484/21/36/365701 ↗
65. 10.1021/nl010044l10.1021/nl010044l ↗
66. 10.1007/s00467-013-2467-y10.1007/s00467-013-2467-y ↗
67. 10.1021/ja01167a00110.1021/ja01167a001 ↗
68. 10.1021/ja017316710.1021/ja0173167 ↗
69. 10.1002/anie.20060314810.1002/anie.200603148 ↗
70. 10.1159/00047601210.1159/000476012 ↗
71. 10.1038/s41581-018-0002-x10.1038/s41581-018-0002-x ↗