journal article·2020-03-25

A Synergistic Relationship between Polycaprolactone and Natural Polymers Enhances the Physical Properties and Biological Activity of Scaffolds

Prasad Sawadkar, Jeviya Mohanakrishnan, Poojitha Rajasekar, Benyamin Rahmani, Nupur Kohli, Laurent Bozec, Elena García-Gareta

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 12· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

Biomaterials for tissue engineering include natural and synthetic polymers, but their clinical application is still limited due to various disadvantages associated with the use of these polymers. This uncertainty of the polymeric approach in tissue engineering launches an opportunity to address a key question: can we eliminate the disadvantages of both natural and synthetic polymers by combining them to form a synergistic relationship? To answer this question, we fabricated scaffolds from elastin, collagen, fibrin, and electrospun polycaprolactone (PCL) with different ratios. The material characterization of these scaffolds investigated degradation, water contact angle, angiogenesis by an ex ovo chorion allantoic membrane (CAM) assay, and mechanical and structural properties. Biological activity and specific differentiation pathways (MSC, adipogenic, osteogenic, myogenic, and chondrogenic) were studied by using human adipose-derived stem cells. Results indicated that all composite polymers degraded at a different rate, thus affecting their mechanical integrity. Cell-based assays demonstrated continual proliferative and viable properties of the cells on all seeded scaffolds with the particular initiation of a differentiation pathway among which the PCL/collagen/fibrin composite was the most angiogenic material with maximum vasculature. We were able to tailor the physical and biological properties of PCL-based composites to form a synergistic relationship for various tissue regeneration applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Regenerative Biomaterials Group, RAFT Institute, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood HA6 2RN, U.K.

Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG5 1PB, U.K.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, U.K.

Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E2, Canada

Funding

Restoration of Appearance and Function Trust

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmat142110.1038/nmat1421 ↗
2. 10.1007/978-0-387-84872-310.1007/978-0-387-84872-3 ↗
3. Davison N. L. · 2014 · 17710.1016/B978-0-12-420145-3.00006-7 ↗
4. Bhatia S. · 2016 · 9510.1007/978-3-319-41129-3_3 ↗
5. 10.22203/eCM.v005a0110.22203/eCM.v005a01 ↗
6. 10.1016/S1387-2656(06)12009-810.1016/S1387-2656(06)12009-8 ↗
7. 10.1021/ma901107610.1021/ma9011076 ↗
8. 10.1039/c0jm04502k10.1039/c0jm04502k ↗
9. 10.1039/b811392k10.1039/b811392k ↗
10. 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00878.x10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00878.x ↗
11. 10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X ↗
12. 10.1159/00044818010.1159/000448180 ↗
13. 10.1089/hum.2010.17310.1089/hum.2010.173 ↗
14. 10.1002/adfm.20050004210.1002/adfm.200500042 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.03.02110.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.03.021 ↗
16. 10.2147/IJN.S6137510.2147/IJN.S61375 ↗
17. 10.1016/0012-1606(74)90316-910.1016/0012-1606(74)90316-9 ↗
18. 10.1080/00914037.2014.97790010.1080/00914037.2014.977900 ↗
19. 10.1021/jz402762h10.1021/jz402762h ↗
20. 10.1098/rstl.1805.000510.1098/rstl.1805.0005 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.002 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.04.01410.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.04.014 ↗
23. 10.1002/jbm.a.3233510.1002/jbm.a.32335 ↗
24. 10.1163/15685620074378810.1163/156856200743788 ↗
25. 10.1080/09205063.2017.139471110.1080/09205063.2017.1394711 ↗
26. 10.1002/bdrc.2104110.1002/bdrc.21041 ↗
27. 10.1038/3502522010.1038/35025220 ↗
28. Dvorak H. F. · Lab. invest.; J. tech. methods pathol. · 1987 · 57 · 673
29. 10.1016/j.cap.2006.11.02610.1016/j.cap.2006.11.026 ↗
30. 10.1089/ten.teb.2012.043710.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.00210.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
32. 10.1088/1748-6041/7/4/04501310.1088/1748-6041/7/4/045013 ↗
33. 10.1002/term.231010.1002/term.2310 ↗
34. Safaeijavan R. · Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. · 2014 · 17 · 903
35. 10.1007/s10529-014-1652-910.1007/s10529-014-1652-9 ↗
36. 10.1089/ten.tec.2009.043210.1089/ten.tec.2009.0432 ↗
37. 10.1089/ten.tec.2014.023010.1089/ten.tec.2014.0230 ↗
38. 10.1007/s13238-015-0135-710.1007/s13238-015-0135-7 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.09.02010.1016/j.actbio.2008.09.020 ↗
40. 10.1007/s13233-013-1099-110.1007/s13233-013-1099-1 ↗
41. 10.1039/C5TB00947B10.1039/C5TB00947B ↗
42. 10.1089/ten.TEA.2013.054510.1089/ten.TEA.2013.0545 ↗
43. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80306-810.1016/S1097-2765(00)80306-8 ↗
44. 10.1101/gad.94870210.1101/gad.948702 ↗
45. 10.1074/jbc.273.46.3005710.1074/jbc.273.46.30057 ↗
46. 10.1371/journal.pone.011362010.1371/journal.pone.0113620 ↗