journal article·2021-05-12

Cross-Linked Covalent Organic Framework-Based Membranes with Trimesoyl Chloride for Enhanced Desalination

Fan-xin Kong, Liping Yue, Zhiyun Yang, Guangdong Sun, Jin-fu Chen

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 13· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

The rational design of continuous covalent organic framework (COF)-based membranes is challenging for desalination applications, mainly due to the larger intrinsic pore size of COFs and defects in the crystalline film, which lead to a negligible NaCl rejection ratio. In this work, we first demonstrated a COF-based desalination membrane with in situ cross-linking of a COF-TpPa layer by trimesoyl chloride (TMC) to stitch the defects between COF crystals and cross-link the COF cavity with high-cross-linking degree networks to enhance NaCl rejection. With the addition of TMC monomers, both small spherical nodules and some elongated “leaf-like” features were observed on the membrane surface due to the appearance of nanovoids during cross-linking. The resulting COF-based desalination membrane had a water permeability of approximately 0.81 L m–2 h–1 bar–1 and offered substantial enhancement of the NaCl rejection ratio from being negligible to 93.3% at 5 bar. Mechanistic analysis indicated that the amidation reaction of the secondary amine in keto COF with TMC induced the formation of a highly porous network structure both in the cavity and on the exterior of COF, thereby successfully forming a continuous and nanovoid-containing selective layer for desalination. In addition, the membrane exhibited excellent desalting performance for real industrial wastewater with both low and high salinity. This study proposed that the introduction of a cross-linker to react with the terminal amine group and secondary amine in the backbone of the keto form of COF or its derivatives could provide a facile and scalable approach to fabricate a COF-based membrane with superior NaCl rejection. This opens a new fabrication route for COF-based desalination membranes, as well as extended applications in water desalination.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, Beijing Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Pollution Control, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China

Research Center for Urban & Rura Water Environmental Technology, China Urban and Rural Holding Group CO., LTD, Beijing 102249, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.watres.2020.11590610.1016/j.watres.2020.115906 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.est.8b0056210.1021/acs.est.8b00562 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.estlett.6b0005010.1021/acs.estlett.6b00050 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.03710.1016/j.watres.2015.04.037 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsami.0c1113610.1021/acsami.0c11136 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.00610.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.006 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2020.10128810.1016/j.progpolymsci.2020.101288 ↗
8. 10.1039/c9cs00322c10.1039/c9cs00322c ↗
9. 10.1126/science.112041110.1126/science.1120411 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.aal158510.1126/science.aal1585 ↗
11. 10.1039/c2cs35072f10.1039/c2cs35072f ↗
12. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11806510.1016/j.memsci.2020.118065 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.11778710.1016/j.seppur.2020.117787 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.11.00510.1016/j.memsci.2018.11.005 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20160394510.1002/adma.201603945 ↗
16. 10.1039/c5cs00878f10.1039/c5cs00878f ↗
17. 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.08.04410.1016/j.memsci.2018.08.044 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11809010.1016/j.memsci.2020.118090 ↗
19. 10.1002/adma.20090343610.1002/adma.200903436 ↗
20. 10.1021/jacs.7b0502510.1021/jacs.7b05025 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.12538610.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125386 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.est.0c0810110.1021/acs.est.0c08101 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.04.02710.1016/j.memsci.2019.04.027 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.12.03610.1016/j.memsci.2010.12.036 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11868110.1016/j.memsci.2020.118681 ↗
26. 10.1021/la020920q10.1021/la020920q ↗
27. 10.1016/j.desal.2008.04.00310.1016/j.desal.2008.04.003 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.11.03810.1016/j.memsci.2007.11.038 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.01.06410.1016/j.seppur.2019.01.064 ↗
30. 10.1039/c9ta08163a10.1039/c9ta08163a ↗
31. 10.1016/j.desal.2019.11412510.1016/j.desal.2019.114125 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.01.04010.1016/j.memsci.2019.01.040 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.10.06310.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.10.063 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.desal.2017.07.01110.1016/j.desal.2017.07.011 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.05.00910.1016/j.seppur.2019.05.009 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41467-019-14056-710.1038/s41467-019-14056-7 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.06610.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.066 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.01510.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.015 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.02.03810.1016/j.memsci.2012.02.038 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.07.03410.1016/j.memsci.2011.07.034 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.cis.2020.10220410.1016/j.cis.2020.102204 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11875410.1016/j.memsci.2020.118754 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.03410.1016/j.desal.2011.08.034 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11829410.1016/j.memsci.2020.118294 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.06.00910.1016/j.memsci.2007.06.009 ↗
46. 10.1016/s0376-7388(01)00630-510.1016/s0376-7388(01)00630-5 ↗
47. 10.1038/s41557-020-00562-510.1038/s41557-020-00562-5 ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b0068610.1021/acs.estlett.9b00686 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.desal.2019.02.00810.1016/j.desal.2019.02.008 ↗