Catalytic Transformation of Persistent Contaminants Using a New Composite Material Based on Nanosized Zero-Valent Iron
Source abstract
Abstract
A new composite material based on deposition of nanosized zerovalent iron (nZVI) particles and cyanocobalamine (vitamin B12) on a diatomite matrix is presented, for catalytic transformation of organic contaminants in water. Cyanocobalamine is known to be an effective electron mediator, having strong synergistic effects with nZVI for reductive dehalogenation reactions. This composite material also improves the reducing capacity of nZVI by preventing agglomeration of iron nanoparticles, thus increasing their active surface area. The porous structure of the diatomite matrix allows high hydraulic conductivity, which favors channeling of contaminated water to the reactive surface of the composite material resulting in faster rates of remediation. The composite material rapidly degrades or transforms completely a large spectrum of water contaminants, including halogenated solvents like TCE, PCE, and cis-DCE, pesticides like alachlor, atrazine and bromacyl, and common ions like nitrate, within minutes to hours. A field experiment where contaminated groundwater containing a mixture of industrial and agricultural persistent pollutants was conducted together with a set of laboratory experiments using individual contaminant solutions to analyze chemical transformations under controlled conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Environmental remediation with nanomaterials · Methemoglobinemia and Tumor Lysis Syndrome · Advanced oxidation water treatment
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Environmental Sciences and Energy Research, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 76100 Israel
Earth Sciences Division, 90-1116, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Mueller, N. C.; Nowack, B. (2010) Report of the Observatory NANO. Available atwww.observatorynano.eu.
2. Karn B. · Environ. Health Perspect. · 2009 · 117 · 181310.1289/ehp.0900793 ↗
3. Muller N. C. · Environ Sci Pollut Res · 2012 · 19 · 55010.1007/s11356-011-0576-3 ↗
4. EPA (2012) Permeable Reactive Barriers, Permeable Treatment Zones, and Application of Zero-Valent Iron: Overview. Available athttp://www.clu-in.org/techfocus/default.focus/sec/permeable_reactive_barriers,_permeable_treatment_zones,_and_application_of_zero-valent_iron/cat/overview/Last updated January 20, 2012.
5. Gillham R. W. · Ground Water · 1994 · 32 · 95810.1111/j.1745-6584.1994.tb00935.x ↗
6. Boronina T. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 1995 · 29 · 151110.1021/es00006a012 ↗
7. Nurmi J. T. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2005 · 39 · 122110.1021/es049190u ↗
8. Crane R. A. · J. Haz. Mat. · 2012 · 211 · 11210.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.11.073 ↗
9. Yang G. C. C. · Water Res. · 2005 · 39 · 88410.1016/j.watres.2004.11.030 ↗
10. He F. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2005 · 39 · 331410.1021/es048743y ↗
11. Kanel S. R. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2005 · 39 · 129110.1021/es048991u ↗
12. Lien H. L. K. · Colloids Surf., A · 2001 · 191 · 9710.1016/S0927-7757(01)00767-1 ↗
13. PARS Environmental. (Dec (2009) An innovative remediation technology for soils and groundwater.http://www.parsenviro.com/nanofeaw-1.html.
14. Qiu X. · J. Haz. Mater. · 2011 · 193 · 7010.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.024 ↗
15. Ponder S. M. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2000 · 34 · 256410.1021/es9911420 ↗
16. Tratnyek P. G. · Nano Today · 2006 · 1 · 4410.1016/S1748-0132(06)70048-2 ↗
17. Kim H. · Desalination · 2008 · 223 · 21210.1016/j.desal.2007.03.015 ↗
18. Li Z. · Chemosphere · 2007 · 68 · 186110.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.03.011 ↗
19. Xiong Z. · J. Nanopart. Res. · 2009 · 11 · 80710.1007/s11051-008-9433-9 ↗
20. Qiu X. · J. Haz. Mater. · 2011 · 193 · 7010.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.024 ↗
21. Ponder S. M. · Chem. Mater. · 2001 · 13 · 47910.1021/cm000288r ↗
22. Meyer D. E. · Environ. Prog. · 2004 · 23 · 23210.1002/ep.10031 ↗
23. Li A. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2007 · 41 · 684110.1021/es070769c ↗
24. Li Y. · Environ. Pollut. · 2011 · 159 · 374410.1016/j.envpol.2011.07.016 ↗
25. Zhang Y. · Sci. Total Environ. · 2011 · 409 · 62510.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.10.015 ↗
26. 10.1002/0471238961.0409012005140708.a01Article10.1002/0471238961.0409012005140708.a01Article ↗
27. Dror I. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2005 · 39 · 128310.1021/es0490222 ↗
28. Muskat L. · Arch. Insect Biochem. Phys. · 1993 · 22 · 48710.1002/arch.940220314 ↗
29. Munch J. W. · 1995
30. Greenberg, A. E.; Clescerl, L. S.; Eaton, A. D.Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater:18th ed. supplement;APHA-AWWA-WEF:Washington, D.C., 1994.
31. de Marsily G. · 1986
32. Fetter C. W. · 1988
33. Elden H. · Asian J. Mater. Sci. · 2010 · 2 · 12110.3923/ajmskr.2010.121.136 ↗
34. Yuan P. · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2004 · 227 · 3010.1016/j.apsusc.2003.10.031 ↗
35. Wang C. B. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 1997 · 31 · 215410.1021/es970039c ↗
36. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.02.00510.1016/j.advwatres.2012.02.005 ↗
37. Ezra S. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2005 · 39 · 50510.1021/es0495157 ↗
38. Taghavy A. · J. Contam. Hydrol. · 2010 · 25 · 12810.1016/j.jconhyd.2010.09.001 ↗