Evaluating Electrolyte–Anode Interface Stability in Sodium All-Solid-State Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
All-solid-state batteries have recently gained considerable attention due to their potential improvements in safety, energy density, and cycle-life compared to conventional liquid electrolyte batteries. Sodium all-solid-state batteries also offer the potential to eliminate costly materials containing lithium, nickel, and cobalt, making them ideal for emerging grid energy storage applications. However, significant work is required to understand the persisting limitations and long-term cyclability of Na all-solid-state-based batteries. In this work, we demonstrate the importance of careful solid electrolyte selection for use against an alloy anode in Na all-solid-state batteries. Three emerging solid electrolyte material classes were chosen for this study: the chloride Na2.25Y0.25Zr0.75Cl6, sulfide Na3PS4, and borohydride Na2(B10H10)0.5(B12H12)0.5. Focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) imaging, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were utilized to characterize the evolution of the anode-electrolyte interface upon electrochemical cycling. The obtained results revealed that the interface stability is determined by both the intrinsic electrochemical stability of the solid electrolyte and the passivating properties of the formed interfacial products. With appropriate material selection for stability at the respective anode and cathode interfaces, stable cycling performance can be achieved for Na all-solid-state batteries.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Inorganic Chemistry and Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Program of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California92093, United States
Department of NanoEngineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California92093, United States
Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois60637, United States
Funding
Division of Chemistry · Division of Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems · National Science Foundation · Division of Materials Research
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/MTS.2010.93810610.1109/MTS.2010.938106 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.00410.1016/j.rser.2014.07.004 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.121274110.1126/science.1212741 ↗
4. 10.1557/s43581-022-00029-910.1557/s43581-022-00029-9 ↗
5. 10.1002/aenm.20200127410.1002/aenm.202001274 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22887210.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228872 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.06.00310.1016/j.joule.2020.06.003 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41560-019-0474-310.1038/s41560-019-0474-3 ↗
9. 10.1039/C9TA11782B10.1039/C9TA11782B ↗
10. 10.1021/jacs.9b0934310.1021/jacs.9b09343 ↗
11. 10.1039/C8EE01053F10.1039/C8EE01053F ↗
12. 10.1038/s41578-021-00401-010.1038/s41578-021-00401-0 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41467-019-13178-210.1038/s41467-019-13178-2 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsaem.0c0187010.1021/acsaem.0c01870 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0001010.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00010 ↗
16. 10.1002/adfm.20200816510.1002/adfm.202008165 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.07.03610.1016/j.nanoen.2018.07.036 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ssi.2021.11567110.1016/j.ssi.2021.115671 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.esci.2021.12.00110.1016/j.esci.2021.12.001 ↗
20. 10.1039/D1SC06745A10.1039/D1SC06745A ↗
21. 10.1038/s41467-022-31792-510.1038/s41467-022-31792-5 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41467-021-21488-710.1038/s41467-021-21488-7 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.497788510.1063/1.4977885 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0230710.1021/acsenergylett.1c02307 ↗
25. 10.1039/D0EE01569E10.1039/D0EE01569E ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0010110.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00101 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41563-019-0431-310.1038/s41563-019-0431-3 ↗
28. 10.1039/C9TA09401F10.1039/C9TA09401F ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.7b1903710.1021/acsami.7b19037 ↗
30. 10.1002/aenm.20150159010.1002/aenm.201501590 ↗
31. 10.1149/2.0501412jes10.1149/2.0501412jes ↗
32. 10.1038/3503504510.1038/35035045 ↗
33. 10.1039/C4NR02480J10.1039/C4NR02480J ↗
34. 10.1002/anie.20140451010.1002/anie.201404510 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0386910.1021/acs.chemmater.0c03869 ↗
36. 10.1007/s40843-020-1580-310.1007/s40843-020-1580-3 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0409610.1021/acs.chemmater.7b04096 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsami.6b1011910.1021/acsami.6b10119 ↗
39. Miessler G. L. · 1999
40. 10.1039/C7CC00794A10.1039/C7CC00794A ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0328410.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03284 ↗
42. 10.1039/D1NR06929B10.1039/D1NR06929B ↗
43. Rajasekharan, T.; Seshubai, V. On the Electrical Conductivity of Transition Metals; arXiv: 1102.5654 [cond-mat]2011.
44. 10.1103/PhysRev.126.136710.1103/PhysRev.126.1367 ↗
45. 10.1002/anie.20170746210.1002/anie.201707462 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.cplett.2014.08.01010.1016/j.cplett.2014.08.010 ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0111610.1021/acs.chemmater.7b01116 ↗
48. 10.1149/1.360798310.1149/1.3607983 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.05.03110.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.05.031 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.apsadv.2021.10011210.1016/j.apsadv.2021.100112 ↗
51. 10.1016/0921-4526(93)90108-I10.1016/0921-4526(93)90108-I ↗