journal article·2019-09-11

Mimicking “J-Shaped” and Anisotropic Stress–Strain Behavior of Human and Porcine Aorta by Fabric-Reinforced Elastomer Composites

Dinara Zhalmuratova, Thanh-Giang La, Katherine Ting-Ting Yu, Alexander R. A. Szojka, Stephen H. J. Andrews, Adetola B. Adesida, Chun-il Kim, David S. Nobes, Darren H. Freed, Hyun-Joong Chung

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 11· Issue 36
Publisher page

Abstract

An ex vivo heart perfusion device preserves the donor heart in a warm beating state during transfer between extraction and implantation surgeries. One of the current challenges includes the use of rigid and noncompliant plastic tubes, which causes injuries to the heart at the junction between the tissue and the tube. The compliant and rapidly strain-stiffening mechanical property that generates a “J-shaped” stress–strain behavior is necessary for producing the Windkessel effect, which ensures continuous flow of blood through the aorta. In this study, we mimic the J-shaped and anisotropic stress–strain behavior of human aorta in synthetic elastomers to replace the problematic noncompliant plastic tube. First, we assess the mechanical properties of human (n = 1) and porcine aorta (n = 14) to quantify the nonlinear and anisotropic behavior under uniaxial tensile stress from five different regions of the aorta. Second, fabric-reinforced elastomer composites were prepared by reinforcing silicone elastomers with embedded fabrics in a trilayer geometry. The knitted structures of the fabric provide strain-stiffening as well as anisotropic mechanical properties of the resulting composite in a deterministic manner. By optimizing the combination between different elastomers and fabrics, the resulting composites matched the J-shaped and anisotropic stress–strain behavior of natural human and porcine aorta. Finally, improved analytical constitutive models based on Gent’s and Mooney–Rivlin’s constitutive model (to describe the elastomer matrix) combined with Holzapfel–Gasser–Ogden’s model (to represent the stiffer fabrics) were developed to describe the J-shaped behavior of the natural aortas and the fabric-reinforced composites. We anticipate that the suggested fabric-reinforced silicone elastomer composite design concept can be used to develop complex soft biomaterials, as well as in emerging engineering fields such as soft robotics and microfluidics, where the Windkessel effect can be useful in regulating the flow of fluids.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Elasticity and Material Modeling · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E1, Canada

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research · Canada Foundation for Innovation · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada · University Hospital Foundation

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/tri.1236110.1111/tri.12361 ↗
2. 10.21037/acs.2018.01.0610.21037/acs.2018.01.06 ↗
3. 10.1532/hsf98.201433210.1532/hsf98.2014332 ↗
4. 10.1139/cjpp-2014-047410.1139/cjpp-2014-0474 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.healun.2016.07.00410.1016/j.healun.2016.07.004 ↗
6. 10.1007/bf0087774710.1007/bf00877747 ↗
7. 10.1002/jbm.b.3418910.1002/jbm.b.34189 ↗
8. Shadwick R. E. · J. Exp. Biol. · 1999 · 202 · 330510.1242/jeb.202.23.3305 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0510910.1021/acsnano.7b05109 ↗
10. 10.1093/icb/24.1.1310.1093/icb/24.1.13 ↗
11. 10.1038/nature2367310.1038/nature23673 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.06.07010.1016/j.polymer.2007.06.070 ↗
14. 10.1039/c7lc00289k10.1039/c7lc00289k ↗
15. Fung Y. C. · 1993 · 32110.1007/978-1-4757-2257-4_8 ↗
16. Abé, H.; Hayashi, K.Data Book on Mechanical Properties of Living Cells, Tissues, and Organs; Sato, M., Ed. Springer: Tokyo, 1996; p 106.10.1007/978-4-431-65862-7 ↗
17. 10.1002/jbm.b.3176310.1002/jbm.b.31763 ↗
18. 10.1511/1998.43.79810.1511/1998.43.798 ↗
19. 10.3390/jfb603050010.3390/jfb6030500 ↗
20. Holzapfel G. A. · 2008 · 28510.1007/978-0-387-73906-9_11 ↗
21. 10.1002/jbm.82001030410.1002/jbm.820010304 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b0030910.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00309 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.06.02410.1016/j.compscitech.2015.06.024 ↗
24. 10.1016/0142-9612(92)90093-410.1016/0142-9612(92)90093-4 ↗
25. 10.1039/c4sm01039f10.1039/c4sm01039f ↗
26. 10.1039/c5mh00127g10.1039/c5mh00127g ↗
27. 10.1016/j.eml.2014.11.00110.1016/j.eml.2014.11.001 ↗
28. 10.1002/adfm.20137025010.1002/adfm.201370250 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.10.01110.1016/j.actbio.2012.10.011 ↗
30. 10.1039/c9ta02326g10.1039/c9ta02326g ↗
31. 10.1016/0142-9612(96)87644-710.1016/0142-9612(96)87644-7 ↗
32. Andriot M. · 2009 · 94
33. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.09.01210.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.09.012 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.02310.1016/j.msec.2019.03.023 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.07.02310.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.07.023 ↗
36. 10.1089/ten.teb.2015.010010.1089/ten.teb.2015.0100 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.artres.2014.02.00110.1016/j.artres.2014.02.001 ↗
38. Gundiah N. · J. Heart Valve Dis. · 2008 · 17 · 606
39. 10.1002/adma.20050243710.1002/adma.200502437 ↗
40. Isselbacher, E. M.Essential Cardiology; Rosendorff, C., Ed. Humana Press, 2005; pp 681–690.
41. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.08.00210.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.08.002 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.06.03710.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.06.037 ↗
43. 10.3791/5843010.3791/58430 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.02.01510.1016/j.ejvs.2010.02.015 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.00310.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.003 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.00210.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.002 ↗
47. 10.1126/sciadv.160032710.1126/sciadv.1600327 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.01.00410.1016/j.memsci.2016.01.004 ↗
49. 10.1177/00405175000700120110.1177/004051750007001201 ↗
50. 10.1089/soro.2017.003510.1089/soro.2017.0035 ↗
51. 10.1080/0360255060061193310.1080/03602550600611933 ↗
52. 10.1039/c5ra06965c10.1039/c5ra06965c ↗
53. Romera, M. F. C. Biomimetic Strain-Stiffening Hydrogels. PhD Thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 2018.
54. 10.1023/a:101083531656410.1023/a:1010835316564 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.02.00410.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.02.004 ↗
56. 10.1007/s12541-012-0099-y10.1007/s12541-012-0099-y ↗
57. 10.5254/1.353835710.5254/1.3538357 ↗
58. 10.1039/c2sm25692d10.1039/c2sm25692d ↗
59. 10.1063/1.487169610.1063/1.4871696 ↗
60. 10.1103/physrevlett.104.17830210.1103/physrevlett.104.178302 ↗
61. Treloar L. R. G. · 1975
62. 10.1098/rsta.1948.002410.1098/rsta.1948.0024 ↗
63. 10.1103/physrevb.76.13411310.1103/physrevb.76.134113 ↗
64. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/10/10500610.1088/0964-1726/23/10/105006 ↗
65. 10.1088/0964-1726/14/6/03210.1088/0964-1726/14/6/032 ↗
66. 10.1111/j.1475-1305.2006.00257.x10.1111/j.1475-1305.2006.00257.x ↗
67. Kumar N. · MIT International Journal of Mechanical Engineering · 2016 · 6 · 43