journal article·2019-12-26

Large-Area Carbon Nanotube-Based Flexible Composites for Ultra-Wide Range Pressure Sensing and Spatial Pressure Mapping

Hongbo Dai, Erik T. Thostenson

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 11· Issue 51
Publisher page

Abstract

Flexible pressure sensors are of broad interest for applications including human-machine interfaces, wearable electronics, and object/motion detection. However, complexities associated with constituent materials, fabrication processes, sensing mechanisms, and hardwiring often hinder the large-scale applications of using high performance pressure sensors reported in the literature. Here we demonstrate a large-area, highly flexible, conformable, and mechanically robust pressure sensor using a silicone elastomer with an embedded nonwoven textile carrier coated with carbon nanotubes. The selected silicone polymer allows through-thickness deformability of the sensor while the high modulus textile carrier ensures in-plane stiffness and stability. The sensor has an initial electrical conductivity of 4.4 ± 0.38 S/m and is fabricated using a straightforward dip coating and polymer infusion process and can be easily scaled-up for large-scale applications. On the basis of its hierarchical composite structure, this piezoresistive pressure sensor possesses extremely high resilience under compression, a repeatable monotonic positive pressure correlation, and an ultrawide elastic working range (5.5 ± 0.5 MPa) that can be segmentally linearized. A true two-dimensional modality for spatial pressure mapping is realized by utilizing electrical impedance tomography (EIT) and demonstrated to yield conductivity maps that can estimate the location, shape, and amplitude of both localized and distributed pressure with simple contact areas.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Dielectric materials and actuators

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adfm.20180850910.1002/adfm.201808509 ↗
2. 10.1039/C4MH00147H10.1039/C4MH00147H ↗
3. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.06.00610.1016/j.carbon.2017.06.006 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.mtphys.2017.06.00210.1016/j.mtphys.2017.06.002 ↗
5. 10.1039/C8TC02946F10.1039/C8TC02946F ↗
6. 10.1016/j.mser.2017.02.00110.1016/j.mser.2017.02.001 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.07.00510.1016/j.carbon.2018.07.005 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.8b0105010.1021/acsami.8b01050 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.sna.2016.01.03710.1016/j.sna.2016.01.037 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.12.02310.1016/j.carbon.2016.12.023 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.07710.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.077 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.12.02510.1016/j.nanoen.2016.12.025 ↗
13. 10.1002/smll.20180081910.1002/smll.201800819 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41427-018-0031-810.1038/s41427-018-0031-8 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20170370010.1002/adma.201703700 ↗
16. 10.1002/adfm.20160443410.1002/adfm.201604434 ↗
17. 10.1002/adfm.20160606610.1002/adfm.201606066 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.8b0045710.1021/acsami.8b00457 ↗
19. 10.1002/adfm.20170750310.1002/adfm.201707503 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.7b0611910.1021/acsami.7b06119 ↗
21. 10.1038/micronano.2016.6510.1038/micronano.2016.65 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.7b1525210.1021/acsami.7b15252 ↗
23. 10.1021/nl300988z10.1021/nl300988z ↗
24. 10.1002/aenm.20180111410.1002/aenm.201801114 ↗
25. 10.1126/science.122245310.1126/science.1222453 ↗
26. 10.1021/acssensors.8b0037810.1021/acssensors.8b00378 ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20160634610.1002/adma.201606346 ↗
28. 10.1002/adfm.20150080110.1002/adfm.201500801 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.8b1584810.1021/acsami.8b15848 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.05.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2018.05.017 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0006310.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00063 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.08.02910.1016/j.carbon.2015.08.029 ↗
33. 10.1109/JSEN.2014.237534610.1109/JSEN.2014.2375346 ↗
34. 10.1038/srep3983710.1038/srep39837 ↗
35. Holder D. S. · 200410.1201/9781420034462 ↗
36. Dai, H. An Innovative Sensing Approach Using Carbon Nanotube-Based Composites for Structural Health Monitoring of Concrete Structures.PhD Dissertation; University of Delaware, 2017.
37. 10.3390/s15071772810.3390/s150717728 ↗
38. 10.1007/s10921-016-0341-010.1007/s10921-016-0341-0 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.08210.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.082 ↗
40. Vauhkonen, M. Electrical Impedance Tomography and Prior Information.PhD Dissertation; University of Kuopio: Finland, 1997.
41. 10.1088/0957-0233/13/12/31010.1088/0957-0233/13/12/310 ↗
42. 10.1109/10.78414710.1109/10.784147 ↗
43. 10.1137/015206010.1137/0152060 ↗
44. 10.1109/42.49141810.1109/42.491418 ↗
45. 10.1088/0967-3334/27/5/S0610.1088/0967-3334/27/5/S06 ↗
46. Polydorides, N. Image Reconstruction Algorithms for Soft-Field Tomography.PhD Dissertation; University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology: United Kingdom, 2002.
47. 10.1038/s41598-019-44420-y10.1038/s41598-019-44420-y ↗
48. 10.1021/acsami.9b0469610.1021/acsami.9b04696 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.12.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2016.12.014 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.01.01910.1016/j.compscitech.2018.01.019 ↗
51. 10.3390/s12070988410.3390/s120709884 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.04910.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.049 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.10.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2011.10.017 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.12.04710.1016/j.compositesb.2016.12.047 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.01.01210.1016/j.compscitech.2016.01.012 ↗