journal article·2015-04-22

Polymer Stabilized Fe3O4-Graphene as an Amphiphilic Drug Carrier for Thermo-Chemotherapy of Cancer

Akshaya Kumar Swain, Lina Pradhan, Dhirendra Bahadur

Publisher page

Abstract

In light of the growing interest in the search for cheap and effective solutions for cancer treatment, we report a simple one pot synthesis of polymer stabilized iron oxide-graphene (PIG) that could be realized on a large scale. The structural (Fe3O4 particle size of ∼11 nm), functional (various oxygen containing moieties), and magnetic (moment of ∼43 emu/g) properties of PIG are explored using various characterization techniques for possible biomedical applications. PIG shows good colloidal stability and is biocompatible even at higher concentrations (2.5 mg/mL) by virtue of cross-linking polymers. The biocompatibility of the composite has been tested using HeLa cell lines by computing the percentage of the reactive oxygen species through the 2,7-dichlorofluorescein (DCF) intensity level. PIG has the ability to load and release both hydrophobic and hydrophilic drugs with a good loading efficiency and capacity. The dug loading efficiency of PIG is measured to be ∼87% and ∼91% for doxorubicin (DOX) and paclitaxel (PTXL), respectively. Under an AC magnetic field, superparamagnetic PIG (2.5 mg/mL) takes less than 16 min to reach the stable hyperthermia temperature, suggesting it as a good anticancer material. A time-dependent cellular uptake of doxorubicin-conjugated PIG has been studied to optimize the parameters for thermo-chemotherapy of cancer. The synergetic effect of both the drug and hyperthermia is observed in the killing of the cancerous cells, verified by computing the cell apoptotic population using a flow cytometer. However, it has been noticed that, even in the absence of chemotherapy, PIG shows good antiproliferative activity with thermotherapy alone.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Neurology and Historical Studies · Neurology and Historical Studies · Historical Philosophy and Science

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

IITB-Monash Research Academy, Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science, Indian Institute of Technology-Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, 400076

Center for Research in Nanotechnology and Science, Indian Institute of Technology-Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, 400076

Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science, Indian Institute of Technology-Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, 400076

Funding

Indian Institute of Technology Bombay · Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology · Monash Research Academy

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Chandra S. · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2011 · 63 · 126710.1016/j.addr.2011.06.003 ↗
2. Brigger I. · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2012 · 64 · 2410.1016/j.addr.2012.09.006 ↗
3. Shen H. · Theranostics · 2012 · 2 · 28310.7150/thno.3642 ↗
4. Lu J. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2013 · 5 · 733010.1021/am401662b ↗
5. Tucek J. · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 757110.1021/nn501836x ↗
6. Goncalves G. · Adv. Healthcare Mater. · 2013 · 2 · 107210.1002/adhm.201300023 ↗
7. Kumar S. R. · Mater. Res. Express · 2014 · 1 · 01501510.1088/2053-1591/1/1/015015 ↗
8. Shi X. · Biomaterials · 2013 · 34 · 478610.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.023 ↗
9. Gao Y. · Colloids Surf., B · 2013 · 112 · 12810.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.07.020 ↗
10. Mao G. Y. · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2014 · 2 · 448110.1039/C4TB00394B ↗
11. Yang Y. Q. · Mater. Today · 2013 · 16 · 36510.1016/j.mattod.2013.09.004 ↗
12. Yang K. · Nat. Protoc. · 2013 · 8 · 239210.1038/nprot.2013.146 ↗
13. Zhang L. · Small · 2010 · 6 · 53710.1002/smll.200901680 ↗
14. Chu H. L. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2013 · 5 · 750910.1021/am401808e ↗
15. Swain A. K. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2014 · 118 · 945010.1021/jp500205n ↗
16. Luk B. T. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 6 · 2185910.1021/am5036225 ↗
17. Gong J. · Int. J. Pharm. · 2009 · 376 · 16110.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.04.033 ↗
18. Ramasamy T. · Carbohydr. Polym. · 2014 · 102 · 65310.1016/j.carbpol.2013.11.009 ↗
19. Nikam D. S. · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2014 · 349 · 20810.1016/j.jmmm.2013.08.039 ↗
20. Shanta Singh N. · Nanotechnology · 2013 · 24 · 06510110.1088/0957-4484/24/6/065101 ↗
21. Wang C. · Sci. Rep. · 2013 · 3 · 285210.1038/srep02852 ↗
22. Gurunathan S. · Biomed. Res. Int. · 2013 · 2013 · 53579610.1155/2013/535796 ↗
23. Bhattacharya K. · Toxicol. Lett. · 2012 · 215 · 15110.1016/j.toxlet.2012.10.007 ↗
24. Pradhan L. · Acta Biomater. · 2014 · 10 · 297610.1016/j.actbio.2014.04.011 ↗
25. Swain A. K. · RSC Adv. · 2013 · 3 · 1924310.1039/c3ra43793k ↗
26. Delbecq F. · Eur. Polym. J. · 2013 · 49 · 265410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.06.014 ↗
27. Cai M. C. · RSC Adv. · 2014 · 4 · 637910.1039/c3ra45993d ↗
28. Hoppe C. E. · Langmuir · 2006 · 22 · 702710.1021/la060885d ↗
29. Shalviri A. · Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. · 2012 · 82 · 58710.1016/j.ejpb.2012.09.001 ↗
30. Yao X. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 6 · 781610.1021/am501093a ↗
31. Jaiswal M. K. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 6 · 623710.1021/am501067j ↗
32. Guo D. · Biomaterials · 2013 · 34 · 788410.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.015 ↗
33. An Q. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2013 · 5 · 1324810.1021/am4042367 ↗
34. Shukla R. K. · Toxicol. in Vitro · 2011 · 25 · 23110.1016/j.tiv.2010.11.008 ↗
35. Maeda H. · Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. · 2009 · 71 · 40910.1016/j.ejpb.2008.11.010 ↗
36. Jaiswal M. K. · J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. · 2014 · 14 · 408210.1166/jnn.2014.8662 ↗
37. Zhang W. · Biomaterials · 2011 · 32 · 855510.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.07.071 ↗
38. Sahu N. K. · Dalton Trans. · 2014 · 43 · 1172810.1039/C4DT00792A ↗
39. Kundu J. · Int. J. Pharm. · 2010 · 388 · 24210.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.12.052 ↗