Competition between Lattice Oxygen and Adsorbate Evolving Mechanisms in Rutile Ru-Based Oxide for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction
Source abstract
Abstract
The oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is the primary bottleneck for electrochemical splitting of water into H 2 . Developing robust and active OER electrocatalysts through understanding the OER mechanism is essential. However, the mechanism for OER is not yet well understood even for the most studied rutile Ru-based oxide, especially in a water-solvent environment. It is still disputed whether the adsorbate evolving mechanism (AEM) is competitive with the lattice oxygen mechanism (LOM). In this article, the AEM and LOM for OER in transition metal (TM)-doped rutile RuO 2 with different ratios of TM and Ru are discussed through density functional theory + U calculation. In low TM doping concentration, the evolved O 2 is generated through the AEM, and the OER activity is limited by the scaling relationship of OER intermediates. In higher TM doping concentration, the evolved O 2 is generated through the LOM for Cu- or Ni-doped RuO 2 . We find that the distribution of Ru 4d and O 2p orbitals and the adsorption energy of H and O are the major factors that affect the conversion of AEM into LOM. By explicitly considering the water-solvent environment, the LOM can result in higher theoretical OER activity arising from the effects of hydrogen-bond networks.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Province and Ministry Co-construction Collaborative Innovation Center of Eco-Chemical Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266042, China
Funding
Taishan Scholar Project of Shandong Province · Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province · Province and Ministry Co-construction Collaborative Innovation Center of Eco-chemical Engineering
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.gee.2020.10.01310.1016/j.gee.2020.10.013 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10627610.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106276 ↗
3. 10.1021/ja407115p10.1021/ja407115p ↗
4. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.05.00510.1016/j.joule.2021.05.005 ↗
5. 10.1021/jacs.8b1145610.1021/jacs.8b11456 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41563-022-01380-510.1038/s41563-022-01380-5 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41467-018-08144-310.1038/s41467-018-08144-3 ↗
8. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0492210.1021/acscatal.9b04922 ↗
9. 10.1039/c9ta00598f10.1039/c9ta00598f ↗
10. 10.1021/acsami.1c2075210.1021/acsami.1c20752 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.14152110.1016/j.electacta.2022.141521 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12815510.1016/j.cej.2020.128155 ↗
13. 10.1021/jacs.1c0038410.1021/jacs.1c00384 ↗
14. 10.1126/sciadv.abl927110.1126/sciadv.abl9271 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20180135110.1002/adma.201801351 ↗
16. 10.1002/smll.20180300910.1002/smll.201803009 ↗
17. 10.1039/c9cs00607a10.1039/c9cs00607a ↗
18. 10.1002/cctc.20100039710.1002/cctc.201000397 ↗
19. 10.1021/acscatal.8b0061210.1021/acscatal.8b00612 ↗
20. 10.1038/nchem.269510.1038/nchem.2695 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41560-019-0355-910.1038/s41560-019-0355-9 ↗
22. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.338234410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
24. 10.1103/physrevlett.77.386510.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 ↗
25. 10.1103/physrevb.73.19510710.1103/physrevb.73.195107 ↗
26. 10.1088/0953-8984/9/4/00210.1088/0953-8984/9/4/002 ↗
27. 10.1021/jp047349j10.1021/jp047349j ↗
28. 10.1021/jz500610u10.1021/jz500610u ↗
29. 10.1002/anie.20210663110.1002/anie.202106631 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13164210.1016/j.cej.2021.131642 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jcat.2014.12.03310.1016/j.jcat.2014.12.033 ↗
32. 10.1002/adma.20150321110.1002/adma.201503211 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.elecom.2009.08.00410.1016/j.elecom.2009.08.004 ↗
34. 10.1002/aenm.20200356110.1002/aenm.202003561 ↗