Machine-Learning-Assisted Design of Highly Tough Thermosetting Polymers
Source abstract
Abstract
Despite advances in machine learning for accurately predicting material properties, forecasting the performance of thermosetting polymers remains a challenge due to the sparsity of historical experimental data and their complicated crosslinked structures. We proposed a machine-learning-assisted materials genome approach (MGA) for rapidly designing novel epoxy thermosets with excellent mechanical properties (high tensile moduli, high tensile strength, and high toughness) through high-throughput screening in a vast chemical space. Machine-learning models were established by combining attention- and gate-augmented graph convolutional networks, multilayer perceptrons, classical gel theory, and transfer learning from small molecules to polymers. Proof-of-concept experiments were carried out, and the structures designed by the MGA were verified. Gene substructures affecting the modulus, strength, and toughness were also extracted, revealing the mechanisms of polymers with high mechanical properties. The developed strategy can be employed to design other thermosetting polymers efficiently.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Advanced Polymeric Materials, Key Laboratory for Ultrafine Materials of Ministry of Education, Frontiers Science Center for Materiobiology and Dynamic Chemistry, School of Materials Science and Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai200237, China
Funding
Shanghai Academy of Spaceflight Technology · Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (73)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c0230510.1021/acs.macromol.0c02305 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsami.1c1361410.1021/acsami.1c13614 ↗
3. 10.1038/nature1464710.1038/nature14647 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10955910.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109559 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10676010.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106760 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2012.07.00810.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2012.07.008 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2012.07.00310.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2012.07.003 ↗
8. 10.1002/pol.1975.18013061010.1002/pol.1975.180130610 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b0208010.1021/acs.macromol.6b02080 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jiec.2015.03.02610.1016/j.jiec.2015.03.026 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.012 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.firesaf.2013.01.00910.1016/j.firesaf.2013.01.009 ↗
13. 10.1021/cm990806210.1021/cm9908062 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2016.12.01410.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2016.12.014 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.10.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2008.10.002 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.06810.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.068 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b0164910.1021/acs.macromol.6b01649 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.03210.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.032 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.12.04810.1016/j.polymer.2018.12.048 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.05.01410.1016/j.carbon.2018.05.014 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.01.01410.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.01.014 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10849510.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108495 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10939210.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109392 ↗
24. 10.1002/app.3775910.1002/app.37759 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12247110.1016/j.cej.2019.122471 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.polymer.2011.04.04110.1016/j.polymer.2011.04.041 ↗
27. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-082019-10510010.1146/annurev-matsci-082019-105100 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.11.02110.1016/j.mattod.2017.11.021 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0291310.1021/acs.jpcc.8b02913 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0493310.1021/acs.chemmater.6b04933 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41524-020-0333-610.1038/s41524-020-0333-6 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.11006710.1016/j.commatsci.2020.110067 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0340210.1021/acs.chemmater.0c03402 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41467-021-22437-010.1038/s41467-021-22437-0 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10893210.1016/j.matdes.2020.108932 ↗
36. 10.1021/jacs.1c0297110.1021/jacs.1c02971 ↗
37. 10.1038/s41586-018-0337-210.1038/s41586-018-0337-2 ↗
38. Joulin, A.; van der Maaten, L.; Jabri, A.; Vasilache, N.Learning Visual Features from Large Weakly Supervised Data. In 14th European Conference on Computer Vision, Proceedings of the ECCV 2016, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11-14, 2016; Leibe, B., Matas, J., Sebe, N., Welling, M., Eds. Springer Verlag: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; Vol. 9911, pp 67–84.10.1007/978-3-319-46478-7_5 ↗
39. Sun, C.; Shrivastava, A.; Singh, S.; Gupta, A.Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Era. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2017, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision 2017, Venice, Italy, October 22-27; IEEE2017; pp 843–852.10.1109/ICCV.2017.97 ↗
40. Hestness, J.; Narang, S.; Ardalani, N.; Diamos, G.; Jun, H.; Kianinejad, H.; Patwary, Md. M. A.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, Y.Deep Learning Scaling Is Predictable, Empirically. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.00409, 2017.
41. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000118)75:3<384::AID-APP7>3.0.CO;2-R10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000118)75:3<384::AID-APP7>3.0.CO;2-R ↗
42. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.02.00510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.02.005 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.macromol.1c0051310.1021/acs.macromol.1c00513 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.01710.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.017 ↗
45. Duvenaud D. K. · Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. · 2015 · 28 · 2215
46. 10.1021/jacs.9b1144210.1021/jacs.9b11442 ↗
47. Ryu, S.; Lim, J.; Hong, S. H.; Kim, W. Y.Deeply Learning Molecular Structure-Property Relationships Using Attention- and Gate-Augmented Graph Convolutional Network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.10988, 2018.
48. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10744010.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107440 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.14210.1016/j.cej.2018.03.142 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.tca.2020.17865710.1016/j.tca.2020.178657 ↗
51. 10.5254/1.353500910.5254/1.3535009 ↗
52. 10.1016/s0300-9440(97)00081-710.1016/s0300-9440(97)00081-7 ↗
53. Flory P. J. · 1953
54. 10.1038/nature1454110.1038/nature14541 ↗
55. 10.1093/bib/bbz04210.1093/bib/bbz042 ↗
56. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0023810.1021/acs.chemmater.0c00238 ↗
57. 10.1021/acsami.0c0629210.1021/acsami.0c06292 ↗
58. Bower D. I. · 200210.1017/CBO9780511801280 ↗
59. 10.1080/0010751050005244410.1080/00107510500052444 ↗
60. Pilkey W. D. · 202010.1002/9781119532552 ↗
61. 10.1126/science.166.3902.17810.1126/science.166.3902.178 ↗
62. 10.1021/jacsau.1c0024610.1021/jacsau.1c00246 ↗
63. 10.1039/d0sc05078d10.1039/d0sc05078d ↗
64. 10.1088/2632-2153/abc81d10.1088/2632-2153/abc81d ↗
65. 10.1021/jacs.2c0530210.1021/jacs.2c05302 ↗
66. 10.1021/ci049867x10.1021/ci049867x ↗
67. Abadi, M.; Barham, P.; Chen, J.; Chen, Z.; Davis, A.; Dean, J.; Devin, M.; Ghemawat, S.; Irving, G.; Isard, M.; Kudlur, M.; Levenberg, J.; Monga, R.; Moore, S.; Murray, D. G.; Steiner, B.; Tucker, P.; Vasudevan, V.; Warden, P.; Wicke, M.; Yu, Y.; Zheng, X.TensorFlow: A System for Large-Scale Machine Learning. In 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 16), Proceedings of the 12th USENIX Symposium on OSDI, Savannah, GA, United States, November 2-4, 2016; USENIX Association: Savannah, GA, 2016; pp 265–283.
68. Kingma, D. P.; Ba, J.Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
69. 10.3102/0034654304500108910.3102/00346543045001089 ↗
70. Nair, V.; Hinton, G. E.Rectified Linear Units Improve Restricted Boltzmann Machines. In 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-10), Proceedings of the 27th ICML, Haifa, Israel, June 21-24, 2010; Omnipress: Wisconsin, USA, 2010; pp 807–814.
71. Pedregosa F. · J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2011 · 12 · 2825
72. 10.1002/cmdc.20080017810.1002/cmdc.200800178 ↗
73. RDKit. RDKit: Open Source Toolkit for Cheminformatics .http://www.rdkit.org/ (accessed July 19, 2022).