journal article·2017-12-20

Monolithic Nanoporous In–Sn Alloy for Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide

Wan Jae Dong, Chul Jong Yoo, Jong-Lam Lee

Publisher page

Abstract

Nanostructured metal catalysts to convert CO 2 to formate, which have been extensively studied over decades, have many problems such as durability, lifetime, high process temperature, and difficulty in controlling the morphology of nanostructures. Here, we report a facile method to fabricate monolithic nanoporous In–Sn alloy, a network of nanopores, induced by electroreduction of indium tin oxide nanobranches (ITO BRs). The electroreduction process concentrated a local electric field at the tip of the nanostructure, leading to current-assisted joule-heating to form a nanoporous In–Sn alloy. Scanning electron microscopy images showed that the nanopore size of In–Sn alloy could be controlled from 1176 to 65 nm by tuning the electroreduction condition: the applied potential and the time. As a result, formate Faradaic efficiency could be improved from 42.4% to 78.6%. Also, current density was increased from −6.6 to −9.6 mA/cm 2 at −1.2 V RHE, thereby resulting in the highest HCOO – production rate of 75.9 μmol/(h cm 2 ). Detachment of catalysts from the substrate was not observed even after a long-term (12 h) electrochemical measurement at high potential (−1.2 V RHE ). This work provides a design rule to fabricate highly efficient and stable oxide-derived electrocatalysts.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and ‡Division of Advanced Materials Science, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang 790-784, Korea

Funding

Samsung

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature1324910.1038/nature13249 ↗
2. 10.1038/ncomms594810.1038/ncomms5948 ↗
3. 10.1039/C2CS35360A10.1039/C2CS35360A ↗
4. 10.1039/C3CS60323G10.1039/C3CS60323G ↗
5. 10.1002/anie.20141023310.1002/anie.201410233 ↗
6. 10.1021/ja506528410.1021/ja5065284 ↗
7. 10.1021/ja509509910.1021/ja5095099 ↗
8. 10.1021/cs500522g10.1021/cs500522g ↗
9. 10.1149/1.208679610.1149/1.2086796 ↗
10. 10.1039/c2ee21234j10.1039/c2ee21234j ↗
11. Hori Y. · 2008 · 8910.1007/978-0-387-49489-0_3 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10800-006-9194-z10.1007/s10800-006-9194-z ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.06310.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.063 ↗
14. 10.1016/0013-4686(94)85172-710.1016/0013-4686(94)85172-7 ↗
15. 10.1021/acscatal.5b0060210.1021/acscatal.5b00602 ↗
16. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b0133610.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01336 ↗
17. 10.1021/ja411388510.1021/ja4113885 ↗
18. 10.1021/ja511890h10.1021/ja511890h ↗
19. 10.1021/jacs.5b0004610.1021/jacs.5b00046 ↗
20. 10.1149/2.0681606jes10.1149/2.0681606jes ↗
21. 10.1038/ncomms761610.1038/ncomms7616 ↗
22. 10.1002/cssc.20150069410.1002/cssc.201500694 ↗
23. 10.1021/acscatal.5b0092210.1021/acscatal.5b00922 ↗
24. 10.1021/cs500522g10.1021/cs500522g ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0329810.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03298 ↗
26. 10.1021/cs501767210.1021/cs5017672 ↗
27. 10.1038/ncomms1212310.1038/ncomms12123 ↗
28. 10.1038/ncomms1074810.1038/ncomms10748 ↗
29. 10.1021/jacs.5b0622710.1021/jacs.5b06227 ↗
30. 10.1021/la501245p10.1021/la501245p ↗
31. 10.1021/ja513051310.1021/ja5130513 ↗
32. 10.1038/srep2507910.1038/srep25079 ↗
33. 10.1021/nn202583610.1021/nn2025836 ↗
34. 10.1038/srep0658910.1038/srep06589 ↗
35. 10.1021/jp048640210.1021/jp0486402 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.10.13010.1016/j.apsusc.2015.10.130 ↗
37. 10.1021/jp107406s10.1021/jp107406s ↗
38. Osório W. R. · Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. · 2011 · 6 · 627510.1016/S1452-3981(23)19680-5 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.01310.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.013 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.10.06510.1016/j.electacta.2009.10.065 ↗