journal article·2021-11-24

Constructing a Rigid-and-Flexible Twin-Stage Gradient Interphase through Starlike Copolymer Coating on Carbon Fibers: A Route for Enhancing Interfacial Properties of Composites

Yanjia Zhang, Kangyi Lu, Mei He, Xiaobiao Zuo, Gang Li, Xiaoping Yang

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 13· Issue 46
Publisher page

Abstract

A rigid-and-flexible interphase was established by a starlike copolymer (Pc-PGMA/Pc) consisting of one tetraaminophthalocyanine (TAPc) core with four TAPc-difunctionalized poly(glycidyl methacrylate) (PGMA) arms through the surface modification of carbon fibers (CFs) and compared with various interphases constructed by TAPc and TAPc-connected PGMA (Pc-PGMA). The increase in the content of N-C═O showed that PGMA/Pc branches were successfully attached onto the CF-(Pc-PGMA/Pc) surface, exhibiting concavo-convex microstructures with the highest roughness. Through adhesive force spectroscopy by atomic force microscopy (AFM) with peak force quantitative nanomechanical mapping (PF-QNM) mode and visualization of the relative distribution of TAPc/PGMA via a Raman spectrometer, a rigid interphase with highly cross-linked TAPc and a flexible layer from PGMA arms as the soft segment were separately detected in CF-TAPc/EP and CF-(Pc-PGMA)/EP composites. The rigid-and-flexible interphase in the CF-(Pc-PGMA/Pc)/EP composite provided excellent stress-transfer capability by the rigid inner modulus intermediate layer and energy absorption efficiency from the flexible outer layer, which contributed to 64.6 and 61.8% increment of transverse fiber bundle test (TFBT) strength, and 33.8 and 40.6% enhancement in interfacial shear strength (IFSS) in comparison with those of CF-TAPc/EP and CF-(Pc-PGMA)/EP composites. Accordingly, schematic models of the interphase reinforcing mechanism were proposed. The interfacial failures in CF-TAPc/EP and CF-(Pc-PGMA)/EP composites were derived from the rigid interphase without effective relaxation of interfacial stress and soft interphase with excessive fiber-matrix interface slippage, respectively. The cohesive failure in the CF-(Pc-PGMA/Pc)/EP composite was attributed to the crack deflection through the balance of the modulus and deformability from the twin-stage gradient intermediate layer.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Organic-Inorganic Composites, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, P. R. China

Aerospace Research Institute of Materials and Processing Technology, Beijing 100076, P. R. China

Changzhou Institute of Advanced Materials, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Changzhou 213164, P. R. China

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China · Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12425510.1016/j.cej.2020.124255 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10833610.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108336 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.05.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2018.05.009 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10945610.1016/j.matdes.2021.109456 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10793210.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107932 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10731310.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107313 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10785510.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107855 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.02.09010.1016/j.apsusc.2019.02.090 ↗
9. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2013.9010.3144/expresspolymlett.2013.90 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsami.6b1319710.1021/acsami.6b13197 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.16810.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.168 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.02.00110.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.02.001 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10853-014-8571-y10.1007/s10853-014-8571-y ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.7b0250310.1021/acsami.7b02503 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsanm.9b0112710.1021/acsanm.9b01127 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.01.01510.1016/j.compscitech.2019.01.015 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10838210.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108382 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10864810.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108648 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.09.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2016.09.005 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.01.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2012.01.004 ↗
21. 10.1002/pen.76028090510.1002/pen.760280905 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.04.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2009.04.008 ↗
23. 10.1002/pc.1005610.1002/pc.10056 ↗
24. 10.1002/admi.20190097010.1002/admi.201900970 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10811410.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108114 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsami.7b1613610.1021/acsami.7b16136 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.09.00510.1016/j.jcis.2020.09.005 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10829610.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108296 ↗
29. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0029010.1021/acssuschemeng.8b00290 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.12631110.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126311 ↗
31. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0359010.1021/acssuschemeng.8b03590 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.08210.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.082 ↗
33. 10.1177/09673911170250011510.1177/096739111702500115 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.12366910.1016/j.polymer.2021.123669 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.05510.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.055 ↗
36. 10.1002/smll.20150276010.1002/smll.201502760 ↗
37. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0208810.1021/acssuschemeng.9b02088 ↗
38. 10.1021/la701784b10.1021/la701784b ↗
39. 10.1021/bk-2002-0801.ch01710.1021/bk-2002-0801.ch017 ↗
40. 10.1016/S0167-5729(99)00003-510.1016/S0167-5729(99)00003-5 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10787710.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107877 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10859310.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108593 ↗
43. Liu Y. · J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. · 2019 · 104 · 18710.1016/j.jtice.2019.09.007 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2020.10463410.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2020.104634 ↗
45. 10.1007/s00044-012-0427-x10.1007/s00044-012-0427-x ↗
46. 10.1021/acsami.7b1476710.1021/acsami.7b14767 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.02.06010.1016/j.matdes.2018.02.060 ↗
48. 10.1002/cphc.20030076010.1002/cphc.200300760 ↗
49. 10.1021/nl034870110.1021/nl0348701 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.22610.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.226 ↗
51. Lokesh K. S. · Dyes Pigm. · 2013 · 96 · 26910.1016/j.dyepig.2012.08.018 ↗
52. 10.1021/np200265d10.1021/np200265d ↗
53. Xue L. · Macromolecules · 2011 · 44 · 285210.1021/ma101651r ↗
54. Zhang X. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2012 · 4 · 154310.1021/am201757v ↗
55. 10.1021/acsami.5b1090310.1021/acsami.5b10903 ↗